Written by vinutux the 8 Mar 08 at 04:16.
Category: Internet & Networking.
Related project:
Nothing/Others.
Status: New
Rationale
There is not a good download manager available under ubuntu.
So many people came from windows prefer download managers always.Some of download mangers available but not stable enough.
Multiget --- always crashed
D4l --- too oldy and buggier
wget --- command line only
wxdfast --- tooo buggy and unusable
Aria ---- too oldy gtk1 app
DownThemAll ---- too slow and not work without firefox
.......................................
some one make a ubuntu version of opensource "freedownloadmanager" (freedownloadmanager.org) appreciated.
It's Windows-only, maybe someone should help them with a Linux port then having it in Ubuntu would be simple.
Looking further, it's C++
It has a Firefox extension already.
It has other extensions that may not be useful.
The Source is 30.2 MB:
4.4MB installer (we won't be needing much from this)
9.2MB FFMPEG
4.5MB BitTorrrent
LibTorrent, Boost
3.7MB InetFile
For FTP & HTTP Downloads, it appears
8.4MB Else
Mostly Code
A lot of Dialog code
All extensions including ie, updater, etc
1856 files total (excluding Setup)
Ugly Dependencies:
Microsoft Foundation Classes
Mostly for display, OLE, Controls
MSHtml
MSXml
Try gwget. Its a GTK frontend for wget and its very quick. Only downside is it doesn't have the feature set you'd find in something like Free Download Manager.
I have been using "Down loader for X" a little. It's a reasonable piece of software... would like to find a better program though (there's quite a few on windows... )
I think you guys should make one, start a project and beg some people on the forums that know how to code. I agree gwget is severely lacking features and configuration but wget is great, and that code is already there and stable.
Aria2 is under development, and a GUI frontend is also being developed as we speek. That said, I think download them all is also getting along quite a bit with the new 1.0 version and firefox3 support.
Pros (for)
1. I don't think downthemall will cut it, as FDM exceeds even the most popular commercial download managers.
2. Most people want their downloads to progress outside the view port (in the taskbar) and check back at it later.
3. We could improve existing apps but it's not improving.
4. Updates to FDM will need to be implemented in the (improved apps) again - we can expect FDM to innovate.
5. Has a plugin architecture (not really sure but there are plugins for the lite version)
6. I haven't mentioned any of FDM's download management features here.
Cons (against)
1. Difficult to port because of MFC and Win API?
2. Don't want another Download Manager (even though the existing ones suck)
3. Don't want another app running and taking precious memory and CPU cycles (don't use the app :P)
4. Can use downthemall (but can't close firefox, then i'm working on something else and i notice firefox running so i check why and its the download..annoying..sometimes i accidentally close it even)
Features of FDM
1. Multi-segment downloads (download acceleration)
2. Resume download (even if not in download history)
3. Minimize to system tray
4. Minimal download status window
5. Site manager
6. Site Explorer
7. Flash video downloads
8. Torrent download (not my favourite feature, I like my dedicated torrent client)
9. File uploading (??? i don't upload many files but some people upload to rapidshare and stuff and it's a good feature)
10. Scheduling downloads (don't know if it allows download groups)
11. HTML Spider (get all files in a site, e.g. download a book that spans hundreds of pages)
12. Has a plugin architecture
Conclusion
If it's difficult to port because of MFC and Win API code then extending a pluggable app like fatrat gets my vote
"Using this free download manager and accelerator, you can download files and complete web sites up to 6 times faster than before. Also we plan to port it to Linux and Mac OS."
So we just need to wait.
sayakb(Brainstorm admin)
wrote on the 1 Aug 09 at 16:09
I don't vote. I just want to tell you my personal situation. I have a 3.6 Mbit mobile broadband connection and my standard download rate is 100 KiB/s and with FDM it is 340 KiB/s.
I hope you make the right decision.
Tried Vuze/Azureus - good download manager and good speed but too many prompted program updates.
Fatrat really does have a lot of features.
Peter-Alexander: I have mobile internet dongle that gives around 340 KiB/s at peak. Simultaneous downloads via wget might see you hit peak rates like that also.
Single downloads even with fixed line broadband sometimes are capped speeds so go multiple to get max.
The best thing to do is to port the FDM to Linux
I am testing different programs in ubuntu and each of them have problems! recently i found fatrat but although it has a scheduling but it doesn't work!!
tired of looking for a program to download!! one of the basic thing in the internet!
How many times do I need to say it, you can't port FDM, because you need to rewrite it entirely to port it..
@Auzy so what? isn't Linux completely different to windows?
so y should only windows get the love?
Any other manager on linux can do all of this features of FDM ? The answer is NO! So we have to port it on linux. not just on linux and for the other unix systems like mac os too. This is very important. FDM work very fast. I like it :) FDM can stop download just for seconds automatically when you are surfing on internet with your browser. and many other features...
I have tried the following managers :
a) Gwget
b) Aria
c) wxDownload Fast
d) MultiGet
e) Downloader for X (d4x)
f) DownThemAll!
g) KGet
and for the console: aria2, wget, axel
h)idm
FDM is the one
I completely agree with you to port FDM to linux i am c++ programmer if i can help please tell me