Ubuntu QA:
BlogBrainstormPackage status
Log in
Ubuntu QA
The Ubuntu community has contributed 22823 ideas, 138726 comments, 2639112 votes
Idea sandbox Idea sandbox
Popular ideas Popular ideas
Ideas in development Ideas in development
Implemented ideas Implemented ideas
Idea #29170: Automatic performace and Desktop environment sugestions

Written by brunopereira81 the 30 Jan 12 at 15:50. Related project: Live CD installer. Status: New
Rationale
Ubuntu should get a ratting system for desktop environments.

Sort of what Windows has at the moment but could evaluate CPU/HD/3D acceleration/MEM req/etc.


For users that have doubts about their system performance the tool could evaluate and make a suggestion for the user to switch to a lighter flavor of Ubuntu if the system fails under certain points.

This could be applied during the LiveCD installation or after an installation as a tool inside the system to troubleshoot performance issues for new users.
Tags: (none)

54
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Ubuntu tool to measure system performance and sugest changes to user desktop env
Written by brunopereira81 the 30 Jan 12 at 15:50.
A tool that would assess the system\'s performance and suggest to the user possible alternatives to desktop environments and programs / services he might be running.


Would be nice to have some tool that said: \"you can run 3D already but your are very short on memory and your HD access seems slow, running Unity on this computer might not be the best choice, here are the recommendations for your system: Xfce, LXDE, etc. Also turn this feature off, turn that service off...\"

I know that graphics are a bit hard to test on a live environment but a lot of hardware can be checked and performance measured during install.

Why not display some recommendation notes during install / after install?

Is that impossible to create?
11
votes
up equal down
Solution #2: Build upon Ubuntu Friendly
Written by cheesehead the 4 Feb 12 at 13:02.
Ubuntu Friendly (checkbox) is a set of tools that check for system compatibility. As this testing application matures, the same tests can be expanded to provide ratings, too.

Two big benefits of starting with checkbox are the existing developer base and the existing database infrastructure...both already supported by Canonical.
9
votes
up equal down
Solution #3: New Benchmark utility
Written by aw@kreawit.se the 6 Feb 12 at 12:27.
Compile a set of benchmarktests that is comparable with other Ubuntu-machines. A combination of lshw-gtk, gnome-disk-utility, sysinfo and hardinfo.

For example hardinfo shows your result of CPU-blowfish and compares it with other CPU:s.

Give CPU, Harddrive, GPU, RAM amount and performance points, save the points at ubuntu one so it can be compared with other ubuntu one connected machines or discussed at forums and with other people.

Lshw can tell what type of memory you have and if there is a socket empty for more.


Propose your solution

Attachments
No attachments.


Duplicates


Comments
Darwin Survivor (Brainstorm moderator) wrote on the 4 Feb 12 at 10:46
@cheesehead Ubuntu Friendly seems to be focused on compatibility (driver support, etc). I think what brunopereira81 is looking for is something that will judge the *power* of each component and possibly suggest simpler software that could be used (ex: XFCE instead of Unity) or hardware that could be upgraded (like in his RAM suggestion).

brunopereira81 wrote on the 10 Feb 12 at 10:07
Exactly.

eklem wrote on the 11 Feb 12 at 20:54
Suggestion for an addition to solution #1: Let the tool run as a daemon for a while and suggest which other daemons to disable/remove.

I know I haven\'t had a printer connected to my Ubuntu/Debian/Mint installation ever, but cupsd is still running.

Not sure how much it will gain, but maybe a tiny bit of memory and some during startup.

oliver-joos wrote on the 16 Feb 12 at 13:23
powertop is a terminal command that gives hints how to save power. A similar tool for hints to save cpu cycles or ram usage would be nice! Perhaps with a gui for mouse addicts.

cheesehead (Brainstorm admin) wrote on the 18 Feb 12 at 21:47
@Darwin,

True...but Ubuntu Friendly is also only methodical system of testing we currently have. It would be much easier to increase their testing and grading spectrum from than to essentailly duplicate that whole project (and developers and database infrastructure).


Post your comment