Written by yzarc the 15 Nov 09 at 12:39.
Related project: Gnome.
Status: New
Rationale
since they appeared, long time ago, they hold more or less the same features.
Let's see two examples:
Google-chrome, they improved it with the tab-bar and everyone loved it.
UNR, they get rid of it and put the caption and controllers in an applet (windows-picker) saving lots of space.
The gnome title-bar is poor in features and ugly too. It's allways in the way of who tried to make gnome look fancy. Think, do you really look at the caption, or you just use it to close or move the windows? If I wanna know which window is the firefox one, the last place I look is the caption.
That is true that global menu can save space, but it is confusing, uncomfortable, a downgrade in usability (my opinion).Maybe you will be starting a new problem to solve a previous one.
And to move toward this solution they should find an way to make all the apps to use it. the two main apps in ubuntu don't, firefox, openoffice.
I loved the solution #4! I guess that bar is a waste of space...
Why confusing?
Confusing if you keep seeing the bar as it is today. We don't need three or four menus (how many we have there??), we could have only one menu with all others inside (and perhaps make a good menu for applications, settings, places, etc. and with a good search bar like in Windows Vista). It could have any graphical tip to separate things.
This way that bar would be totally different. A different concept. BTW, we should get rid of the title bar too (keeping it would be confusing).
I don't see a downgrade in usability, everything would still stand right in front of your eyes. I see an upgrade in usability yet optimizing the space.
About to find a way to make all the apps to use it? Well, don't they want to build apps to Ubuntu? So follow the rules...
P.S. I don't write programs, so i don't know the technical barriers to make it work, but we have to wonder about new things... isn't it a brainstorm?
Solution #4 is a carbon copy from OS X and totally wrong.
1. It pollutes global desktop space with application-specific information - this is a major usability failure.
2. It does not remove the need for the window's title bar.
Solution #2 is better, but creates problems if someone wants to move the window.