Ubuntu QA:
BlogBrainstormPackage status
Log in
Ubuntu QA
The Ubuntu community has contributed 21986 ideas, 135057 comments, 2615221 votes
Idea sandbox Idea sandbox
Popular ideas Popular ideas
Ideas in development Ideas in development
Implemented ideas Implemented ideas
Idea #2203: Allow CJK input (with scim) on non-CJK locales

Written by Loïc the 1 Mar 08 at 15:01. Category: System. Related project: Nothing/Others. Status: New
Rationale
At the moment, an user under a Latin locale (English, Spanish, French, German) has no way to input Chinese, Japanese or Korean in applications like Open Office or Firefox.

The System>Administration>Language Support tools only set up scim if your session is in a language already using scim. Checking the Input Method box to activate complex characters input does nothing under a session using Latin characters. You will be able to type a CJK language in gedit, but not in OO or Firefox.

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scim/+bug/34282
and https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SCIM for a description of the problems and the ways to solve it for each version of Ubuntu. This steps have to be done in the main distribution, not on the user level, because they require editing system files.

CJK input has been offered by Microsoft since Windows XP - in 2008, it is still a thorn in the Ubuntu side.

For QA, each release should be tested in a few selected Latin locales (for example the most common - English, Spanish, French, German), with the user selecting Chinese, Japanese or Korean, enabling the input of complex characters, then launching Open Office and verifying that Ctrl-Space opens the scim bar, then deselecting the input and checking that everything has returned to normal.

One does NOT need any knowledge of foreign languages to check if it works - any English speaking developer can do the steps required.
Tags: (none)

10
votes
closed
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #2203
Written by Loïc the 1 Mar 08 at 15:01.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #2203 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

Propose your solution

Attachments
No attachments.


Duplicates


Comments
No comments.

Post your comment