Written by JReagan1990 the 17 Feb 09 at 16:19.
Related project: ubuntu.com.
Status: New
Rationale
Just like Microsoft has MSDN, Sun has SDN, why not have a UDN? :)
We have MOTU, but still the wiki pages are scattered and not exactly the best guides on how to begin programming. Beginners would find it troubling on how to begin. Creating a developer community around Ubuntu would be extremely beneficial.
I'm 100000000000000000000000000000% with you , ubuntu developers must have a network to connect them together. It is a very important that must be applied by Ubuntu .
I agree with you on so many levels. Ubuntu really needs this! It's already a great environment for learning more about computers. Ubuntu needs to capitalize on that by encouraging more people to take an active interest in learning to program, and providing resources about programming. Things like tutorials on building a few fun applications using different programming languages, such as a few on making games using Python and PyGame, or using Mono, for example.
You are SOOOOOO 10-hundred-gazillion-percent right it's not even mildly humorous, let alone funny. . . .
And Andrew is (as I have noticed before) so right on the mark it's a wonder.
Developers need a UDN for Ubuntu. Developers need a unified development environment for Ubuntu. Developers need a way to know / find-out what the #$&^@*!!! is going on for Ubuntu. . .
They need to know that they will be able to get in, get busy, and get done without wasting their time spinning wheels or re-inventing fire.
**I, myself** have ideas for things I'd like to either see - or tweak - and I would have absolutely NO PROBLEMO DUDE helping out with the occasional tweak or twist here or there, or maybe developing that "Killer App" that I've been dreaming about. . .
But every time I look at the development tools, I get a headache. It's such a balls-up confuserated mess that it's a wonder that ANYONE IN HIS RIGHT MIND would develop for Linux, let alone Ubuntu!
This suggestion is such a loaded suggestion - and in order to do it really rightly - there is so much that would need to happen.
However, having my choice between a piece of the pie, or NO PIE, I'll take the piece any day of the week!
Thank you all so much for the support! I have for some time now wanted this to happen.
For the work, I mean, really... it should seem simple that wiki pages should be put in the order (or at least different tracks) that people can follow. Right now it seems like a tangled vine of wiki pages going all over the place... linking in every which direction -- yet never the info you need. I personally feel very strongly about this idea since I have gone through the development process and even uploaded to REVU. It wasn't easy, and it could have been a lot easier to learn.
I do believe that all features should be free for this idea... in all due respect, creating a site that would hinder it's usage based on a fee goes against what Linux and Ubuntu stands for. Especially at this point, we need to work on building a community around development, rather than hindering it. If the folks at Canonical want to make money, they can sell advertising.
Making it subscription based would kill it in my eyes. Hopefully a site like that could be supported by advertising. If it couldn't, I'm against the idea.
I like the free beer concept, but, IMO, Linux users should support the developers (Youtube Steve Ballmer) and maintainers that would be contributing to UDN.
Most developers (if not all) who are not employed by a company to develop on open source software are not paid, they do it in their free time. Perhaps, if a help system was set up for tutoring, then people could give donations via PayPal if they would like. That is better than a closed-system proprietary developer's site.
This is a perfect idea! It is a great way for Ubuntu to get more developers! However, making it subscription based would not help ubuntu get more developers at all.
I like the "Solution #4: Make a learn on your own style course" idea, but I think that python or C# (mono) would be better languages to start with than C