maybe as part of the install benchmarks could be ran to determine which compile option would work better. then the proper version could be fetched. maybe make this more of a global setting that other programs could reference
I think that some packages in ubuntu repository (like fglrx drivers) already, similar to gentoo, only download package source from external url and compile it. Maybe it is posible to make same trick
2nailmilan
Shouldn't help because of lack of CPU-specific optimizations. Fx become faster but slower then 3.1 on Windows.
2Wouter.de.Groot
> The downside is that this means multiple firefox packages need to be maintained.
Look, one win-version have all optimizations enabled and works properly on any Windows from XP and up to 7beta on any CPU. What's wrong with CPU-optimizations under linux? Ok, there is no x64 version for Windows but it's doesn't matter.
I dont think that slownss of ff on linux is cpu-optimization rlatd. GPO or ICC arnt cpu-spcific, mayb architctur spcific (bcaus of intl compilator) but not particular cpu spcific
@AndrewLuecke
"Xul is slower" makes more sense than "X11 is slower". X11 is something that touchs the whole desktop. But it looks like nobody likes Epiphany as I do...
@ AndrewLuecke:
Javascript benchmarks show that it is slower. While X11 may contribute to slowness in some cases, these benchmarks are not affected because they don't actually draw anything on the screen while they run.
I can look into the 64bit flash for PPA. I have seamonkey I'm working on at this time so i should start on it after seamonkey 1.1.15 is released and i finish with it. It should be released in next few days than i need a day or 3 to finish it.
If someone wants to play with 64bit java feel free ;)
icc creates by far suboptimal results for non intel cpus (e.g. amd, via, ...) pgo is certainly a better solution. maybe ask swiftweasl author for hints?
@brownbat
I personally prefer Epiphany, but if people coming from Windows want a popular browser, Chrome is a better option than Firefox, as it will use native GTK+ widgets and the WebKit engine. So voted +1 for your solution.
Chrome for Ubuntu and Konqueror for Kubuntu!
Looking at the votes on solutions I realize that Firefox in Linux sucks, but we like it anyway. We don't know exactly what to do about it, but we know that something has to be done. We can start with anything.
Oh, and there's at least one guy who is really satisfied with the poor Firefox we have on Ubuntu (or he is really satisfied with his Windows and he shouldn't be here writing crap).
"Danielrmt.. And what makes you think chrome on linux will run faster then Firefox on linux? Its not even out."
There are some intriguing aspects to the design that should make it faster in certain situations. Chrome seems to be faster on Windows than FF, so it's not outlandish to expect the same on a free OS. But you're definitely right, it is hard to tally the chicks when all you have are eggs.
Don't get me wrong, I would prefer FF were simply improved. When I originally posted the suggestion, I mostly wanted to test whether or not the love for FF over those other browsers had something to do with it being cross-platform. I think that theory can be discounted. M. Vinicius's is right, we just like it.
With this 9.10 release this should be brought to life.
I have a clean install and ff is slow like hell.
Something should be done, if not by Mozilla, then by canonical. With all this cloud computing fuzz one of the most important parts (the browser) sucks, something is not right. What good that is integrated with Ubuntu One if people are starting to use Chromium because FF is crazy slow?
cheesehead(Brainstorm admin)
wrote on the 7 Jul 11 at 05:06
If you still have this issue, then please file a bug report.