166
votes
|
|
187
0
21
|
|
|
|
|
Propose your solution
Attachments
No attachments.
Duplicates
Comments
|
|
|
Impressive, however, when I manipulated the images it was slow. Even is this was available for my wallpaper, I wouldn't use it. I'll give it a +1 because it blew my mind.
|
|
neon
wrote on the 24 Jun 08 at 16:42
|
|
|
|
That's awesome. @.@ I didn't know you could do that with SVG.
|
|
|
That was pretty cool.
Though, it was a bit slow on my 2.13 GHz computer. It needs to be faster in some way.
Pretty cool technology. Imagine that together with multi-touch input touchscreen. :)
|
|
|
I already gave you +1. I just want to say this really is impressive. Especially the possibility of making things bigger and rottation. :D
But it takes a lot of time to load but then it works just fine, I'm guessing that if this was local file it wouldn't load for that amount of time.
|
|
|
really cool !! but this is very slow .. if made faster a bit then can be awesome thing
+1
|
|
Taku
wrote on the 24 Jun 08 at 19:47
|
|
|
|
Quite nice but ... hm ... doesn't it make you remind the possible ugly ActiveDesktop (r) wallpaper of Win98 when the desktop crashes ? ... It would be interesting but we certainly couldn't allow win98-like desktop crashes (cause this isn't only svg, but nested javascript into svg).
|
|
|
|
Slow? Do you have a GPU (video card)?
|
|
Vadim P.
wrote on the 24 Jun 08 at 22:12
|
|
|
|
That's pretty amazing, didn't know you could do it with svg either.
|
|
Vadim P.
wrote on the 24 Jun 08 at 22:13
|
|
|
|
Oh guys. We were tricked. It's not an svg if you look at the source code - it's javascript.
|
|
|
it seems to be a SVG with javascript doing all the work. Don't know if this is still a proper SVG.
still +1 because it impressed me so much :-O
|
|
gsiliceo
wrote on the 24 Jun 08 at 23:58
|
|
|
|
It is cool but i wish it wasnt so cpu consuming.
|
|
|
Folks, this is Firefox' SVG implementation - it doesn't mean that Ubuntu's implementation has to be as slow (WebKit and Opera's implementations are actually faster).
SVG on its own is just markup - but SVG can be combined with JavaScript and the SVG DOM (similar to the HTML DOM) to do very Flash-like things in web browsers. It would be really cool to do stuff like this in Ubuntu (I thought KDE 4.x was already advancing towards this).
|
|
eld1e6o
wrote on the 25 Jun 08 at 03:45
|
|
|
I do not think it is a good idea at this time
is striking but also heavy and without utility
|
|
Auzy
wrote on the 25 Jun 08 at 03:52
|
|
|
|
Actually, over here, its running perfectly
|
|
Auzy
wrote on the 25 Jun 08 at 03:53
|
|
|
Also, IF you are paranoid about resource usage, JUST DONT USE IT!!!!
But ffs, don't vote this down so that nobody else can
|
|
|
|
I had no speed issues here on my XP box. will check at home on Ubuntu again.
|
|
|
it worked beautfully for me. Asus 1.60ghz laptop. Average graphics card.
+1
(you should be able use languages other than javascript if it's on the desktop too)
|
|
|
|
I'm guessing that part of the slowdown is because Firefox has to process the XML... an amazing idea, and if it's relatively easy to implement, ++1. This would be a great extra feature for higher-end systems; after all, Intrepid is supposed to be focusing on scaling performance to the system's capabilities, no?
|
|
sealview
wrote on the 26 Jun 08 at 11:21
|
|
|
That's just awesome
+1 and many more!
|
|
flammon
wrote on the 26 Jun 08 at 12:07
|
|
|
|
It is faster on Windows because of the hardware acceleration present there that is not on the Linux version of Cairo. Cairo is not fully hardware accelerated on Linux - even if you have the hardware and the proper drivers.
|
|
Auzy
wrote on the 26 Jun 08 at 12:18
|
|
|
|
Dunno if thats a good reason not to have it on linux though, but this is a good reason for Cairo to be improved on linux..
|
|
Vadim P.
wrote on the 26 Jun 08 at 12:20
|
|
|
I think it's because ff3 for linux sucks on javascript performance, badly.
Some pages can even make your computer unusable. grrr
|
|
jhoger
wrote on the 27 Jun 08 at 01:37
|
|
|
I'm not seeing the point here. Cool demo... but of what?
I hate fiddling with window positions. Why would I want the background to be fiddly? Who is it that hungers for fiddly backgrounds?
|
|
uaneme
wrote on the 28 Jun 08 at 01:15
|
|
|
It's pretty heavy on CPU -1 for that
looks good and innovative + 1 for that.
does this mean we can turn the browser upside down with a drag? (text included, scaled etc.) It does it only work with pictures?
|
|
Vadim P.
wrote on the 28 Jun 08 at 02:41
|
|
|
|
You already can with the compiz freewins plugin I think
|
|
|
|
why not just use the picture frame plasmoid in kde4? it's the same as that svg.
|
|
BigDXLT
wrote on the 20 Jul 08 at 07:45
|
|
|
^ That sort of thing is why I use KDE4 (though I admit I haven't used that particular plasmoid yet.) However, I'm sure such a feature isn't part of Ubuntu "regular."
The neat part to me isn't altogether the rotating and scaling, but having a couple of pictures at once. The traditional "made for the desktop" artwork probably wouldn't work well with it, but where it would be really neat is like that example with a few photos to make a nice mosaic without having to use something more complex like gimp, et al. Only change I'd like over that example is the ability to lock it, once I did set it, so random clicks aren't moving things around.
++
|
|
retj
wrote on the 23 Jul 08 at 06:53
|
|
|
|
Isn't that what Plasma already does?
|
Post your comment
|
