My graphics hardware was added to the compiz hardware blacklist for the Intrepid release. Annoying asthis is I'm sure they had their reasons. Sadly though I had no idea about this until I 'upgraded' from Hardy and everything went bad without the possibility of undoing any of the changes.
Great.
Maybe the upgrade app could be made to check my (god damn!) hardware BEFORE 'upgrading' me.
In fact if ANY software blacklists ANY hardware should it not be standard practice to publish this info and have applications that do 'upgrading' check it first?
Roger.
PS.
To those smug people just dying to type 'you should have checked yourself before upgrading' really don't bother - my idea is to AUTOMATE SOMETHING THE COMPUTER CAN AND SHOULD DO FOR ME, not become a full time OS geek.
I made some changes to a source package downloaded earlier, compiled and tried to install on another computer, but failed, because it depends on the deleted "proposed" versions of some packages, and I have to build this package again. It will be more trouble if I take these modified packages to somewhere without a fast internet connection nor required header files installed, without a test. I think there should be some way to let me know when an installed package version is deleted from server, to prevent such problems. There should be also a short note about why it is deleted, to let me decide to downgrade or not
The best place for these messages should be update-manager, where the unavailable versions were installed with a simple click
Despite massive advances in the way Ubuntu looks in the most recent release, Ubuntu LTS is far behind. Lets face it, Ubuntu 8.04 is not the most attractive OS in the world, and I feel that the whole release is being left behind, kinda against the whole point of an LTS, to keep it up-to-date yet stable. And as far as I can see, upgrading the look of the LTS isn't gonna make it unstable
Subject: When a release reaches End-of-Life, update manager should show EoL status and provide a link with working procedures and more information.
Severity: wishlist
Related to: Bug #1, update-manager, ubuntu documentation
Description:
Supposedly a release reaches its End-of-Life (EoL). In that case repositories simply disappear, just as they have with 7.04 Feisty, see: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/feisty/
The old releases archives and installation files are transferred to http://old-releases.ubuntu.com
Yet, a simple user, that has just installed the world of Internet. They have installed an Ubuntu release before and were using it offline, and the release is not supported anymore.
The update-manager prompts the user with the choice to upgrade to a newer release and, due to these changes, they can't.
Scenario:
- A granny has been using a computer with Ubuntu installed.
- The same granny recently decided to get connected to the internet, but she was using an Ubuntu distribution that has reached its EoL.
- She connects to the internet, says "OK, let's see some Internet-related applications".
- She discovers System > Administration > Update Manager. "Oh let's try it and see if there's anything new of games for my grandchildren"
- She checks for updates and notices the new release upgrade. "A new version of Ubuntu, how nice, let's download it then!"
- She can't upgrade because the repository or repositories are missing and cannot be found. The notification for new release upgrade is still available though. "Oh great, now what do I do?"
to provide a set of clear installation/upgrade instructions for idiots like me who don't have live cd or update manager and may have an old copy installed and running on multi boot but cant access ubuntu due to password failure. sorry if there is something but I cant find it also to be able to edit the title if you misspell it
When you need to identify yourself as the administrator, for example when updating packages, you dont know in what language you are typing the password, and it is annoying
This would be the equivalent of 'apt-get update' for security updates the moment they are made available,
so there would be a minimal time-frame in which a security update isn't applied.
The implementation of how this would be done is open for discussion..
Currently, if a package/the system is being upgraded, loss of power can bring the system to non-booting state because of half-upgraded/half-installed packages (especially the system ones).
When the final release of Intrepid Ibex will be ready on October 30 th.No automatic message has to appear in Synaptic or the other one.
The news will be known by information on Internet, official announcement, etc....
The only way to upgrade will be to type in a terminal:
" Sudo apt-get dist-upgrade"
So,only most motivated people, Geeks ,...Will upgrade to Intrepid Ibex .They will report the main bugs via Launchpad.
And only when the bigs Bugs will be fixed, the automatic message will appear as before.The period(delay) will be from 2 weeks to one month.
The servers will be less saturated and Ubuntu 8.10 will win in stability.
The most famous example is Mozilla who has waited for firefox version 3 upgrade in version 3.1 to propose the automatic update of version 2 for the general public.
Sorry for my English !