Ubuntu QA:
BlogBrainstormPackage status
Log in
Ubuntu QA
Update manager
Idea sandbox Idea sandbox
Popular ideas Popular ideas
Ideas in development Ideas in development
Implemented ideas Implemented ideas

Ideas in development Here are ideas about Update manager that have been marked as already implemented by the moderators.

Ubuntu 12.04 - Update checks; Frequency of update checks  
Written by How_bout_dis the 27 Nov 12 at 04:03. Already implemented
At present the minimum update check time period "daily".
0
votes
closed
Solution #1: Ubuntu 12.04 - Update checks; Frequency of update checks
Written by How_bout_dis the 27 Nov 12 at 04:03.
I would like to suggest the more frequent period be considered; such as, every 12 hours or even every hour. Just a thought.

See the 2 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 4 Dec 12 at 05:38) >>

Is it possible to check computer compatibility before installation of Ubuntu  
Written by flooted the 5 Nov 12 at 22:27. Already implemented
When I installed 12.10 on my crappy old HP the wifi didn't work and the graphics were all over the place. I spent ages trying to fix the problems, got wifi working but the graphics just crashed all the time. So I went back to 12.04 after wasting a good few days looking for solutions on the internet.
0
votes
closed
Solution #1: Is it possible to scan the computer before updating
Written by flooted the 5 Nov 12 at 22:27.
I was wondering if it's possible for installation disk to scan my computer before proceeding with the update, telling me things that won't work, telling me what drivers are or are not available, if my graphics card is crap, etc. Maybe this is already available, maybe it's too difficult. But it would be nice.

See the 2 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 6 Nov 12 at 10:44) >>

Some of us automatic has Alphas for testing in a Virtual box  
Written by AdlerHorst the 11 Jun 12 at 09:15. Already implemented
Some of us as Standard has Alphas for testing in a Virtual box. With a little wish to by every time up to date
0
votes
closed
Solution #1: Roling Releases for Alpha versions
Written by AdlerHorst the 11 Jun 12 at 09:15.
here should be a Testing Distro For Testing and experimenting with new Features and Functions.

This Distro should also ship enhanced Bug-Reporting and a Pollfeature who aloud to Ask omething about the Ubuntu using.

Canonical shold also drive this Distro strictly. If there are cleanings and so on Ubuntu should clean-up correcting an so one.

See the 2 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 18 Oct 12 at 20:34) >>

Add option to automatically update  
Written by manuelciosici the 31 May 12 at 20:26. Already implemented
As Ubuntu use becomes more spread people with a wide variety of technical skills start using it. Ubuntu's constant stream of updates might become confusing for non technical users and which will feel frustration, confusion and then just ignore the updates.

Having users on a wide variety of software versions causes fragmentation of the entire platform and can open security holes in their systems.
0
votes
closed
Solution #1: Add option for automatic updates
Written by manuelciosici the 31 May 12 at 20:26.
Ubuntu should include an option to install security updates automatically, there should be one that just installs any updates automatically. Software such as Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox have proven on other platforms the advantages of automatic, behind the scenes updates. The concept of automatic updates is also starting to catch up in the mobile field, Android can automatically update applications.

Here's a list of important applications for both home users and businesses that receive often updates through the update system, updates which ignoring people might miss: Mozilla Firefox (business & private), Mozilla Thunderbird (business & private), samba (mostly business), java and flash security updates (business & private).

See the 2 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 1 Jun 12 at 03:56) >>

Checking for updates at the right time  
Written by japr the 6 Apr 12 at 07:36. Already implemented
On every version of Ubuntu I have used, the Update Manager pops-up by default and it's never quite the right time to do so. Result: I end up not updating as frequently as I should.
-11
votes
closed
Solution #1: Automatically check for updates option.
Written by japr the 6 Apr 12 at 07:36.
In the automatically check for updates option we should have an extra option. That could be "While away for more than X minutes". When one would choose that option, the "When there are security updates" setting could be changed to "Download and install automatically".
42
votes
closed
Solution #2: Let the user specify at what time the updates are installed
Written by papukaija the 9 Apr 12 at 14:50.
Add an option "Automatically install updates at X am/pm". Even Windows allows this.
9
votes
closed
Solution #3: Let user set upgrade time + option to only run if screensaver is on
Written by Sepero the 11 Apr 12 at 13:37.
Download upgrades at a specified interval, and allow the option to only download when the screensaver is running.

After all the upgrades are ready to be installed, put up a tray icon notifying that upgrades are ready to be installed.

The user can click to install the upgrades at anytime, and have an option to logout/shutdown/reboot the computer after upgrades are finished installing.

See the 4 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 5 May 12 at 02:35) >>

Improving Update Manager  
Written by joy23 the 9 Dec 11 at 20:45. Already implemented
Update manager while checking for updates and listing them
has all updates ticked by default.
So if you have very few packages to update (1-5)

Then you manually have to uncheck every update.
0
votes
closed
Solution #1: Single point check box for CheckAll/Uncheck all
Written by joy23 the 9 Dec 11 at 20:45.
Update Manger
Proposed Updates
[~] asd
[~] asx
[~] gfh
[~] gnm
Recomended Updates
[~] asd
[~] asx
[~] gfh
[~] gnm
================================
to
Update Manager
[~]
Proposed Updates
[~] asd
[~] asx
[~] gfh
[~] gnm
---- ------
Recomended Updates
[~] asd
[~] asx
[~] gfh
[~] gnm

--------------------// Checkbox Unchecked
[ ]
Proposed Updates
[ ] asd
[ ] asx
[ ] gfh
[ ] gnm
---- ------
Recomended Updates
[ ] asd
[ ] asx
[ ] gfh
[ ] gnm
0
votes
closed
Solution #2: Put Checkbox besides Headings too
Written by joy23 the 9 Dec 11 at 20:54.
Instead Of all those you could also,

Let Uncheck All/ Check All right click option
remain as it is
and provide for selection based on Headings?

[~] Recommended Installs
[ ] Proposed Installs

The actual reason for suggestion for above methods is
a newbie would have to go through lot of reading or exploration just to find out the above are
already implemented but solutions arent visible there.

See the 2 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 11 Dec 11 at 10:48) >>

Update Manager does not handle download failures robustly  
Written by hans00 the 8 Nov 11 at 01:12. Already implemented
When updating packages through Update Manager, packages that fail to download are not handled well, and the entire update can fail due to a few failed packages.

Motivating example: When doing an update of 208 packages, I ran into the following errors:
Update failed

Failed to fetch http://ubuntu.osuosl.org/ubuntu/pool/main/c/cups/libcups2_1.5.0-8ubuntu3_i386.d eb 404 Not Found [IP: 64.50.236.52 80]
Failed to fetch http://ubuntu.osuosl.org/ubuntu/pool/main/c/cups/libcupscgi1_1.5.0-8ubuntu3_i38 6.deb 404 Not Found [IP: 64.50.236.52 80]
Failed to fetch http://ubuntu.osuosl.org/ubuntu/pool/main/c/cups/libcupsdriver1_1.5.0-8ubuntu3_ i386.deb 404 Not Found [IP: 64.50.236.52 80]

... etc...

In all, 28 packages failed to download, and trying again resulted in the same failure. I was able to work around the issue by unselecting the failed packages and then retrying.
0
votes
closed
Solution #1: Retry package downloading with another server
Written by hans00 the 8 Nov 11 at 01:12.
When this type of package download failure occurs, the download could be retried using another mirror.

See the 5 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 8 Nov 11 at 18:29) >>

Upgrading Ubuntu is not always desirable just to fix a few programs  
Written by turbolad the 26 Jun 11 at 12:30. Already implemented
Why is it necessary to upgrade Ubuntu just to fix a few trivial programs? As an example, I could not install Ubuntu version 11.04 on a friend's PC (the Nvidia graphics driver was VERY problematic on Ubuntu version 11.04), but Ubuntu 10.10 did not have that problem - however a few programs such as the game "Lights Off" don't work in Ubuntu version 10.10. This is why I'm asking: is it really necessary to upgrade Ubuntu just to get the fixes for programs such as the "Lights Off" game?

Why not deliver the fixes via the Update Manager instead of forcing the user to upgrade the entire operating system?
0
votes
closed
Solution #1: Release fixes for programs on supported Ubuntu versions instead of upgrading
Written by turbolad the 26 Jun 11 at 12:30.
Instead of trying to force the user to upgrade Ubuntu (which is not always possible - see the description above), why not release the program fixes via the Update Manager on all supported versions of Ubuntu? It would make things a *LOT* simpler for the end users.

See the 3 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 29 Jun 11 at 03:05) >>

Half-Rolling  
Written by dh04000 the 20 Jun 11 at 01:36. Already implemented
The current release model of Ubuntu trap users with outdated and unsupported applications that have security issues. Forcing users to under go the disruptive process of installing a new version of Ubuntu every 6 months just to have access to new versions of applications is hard on users. Especially new linux converts whom are used to the self-updating application model found on Mac and Windows.

Problems with Current Ubuntu release model:

-Difficulty for Users to access updated applications
-Security Issues related to out-dated applications due to opensource model of putting security and bug updates in the newest release only.
-PPA's not User Friendly, Hard for New Users, Not intended for keep application updated.


Benefits of Half-Rolling Model

-Up to date applications
-Better application security
-Better Usability
-Matches the expectations of new users and industry used to the Mac and Windows model of a stable core and updating applications.
-Maintains stability of Ubuntu, unlike a real rolling distro.
0
votes
closed
Solution #1: Adopt a Half-Rolling Release Model
Written by dh04000 the 20 Jun 11 at 01:36.
A Half-Rolling release model is based on the idea of keeping a stable core, while updating applications as they are released. This is the model founded by the Chakra Linux community. In order to implement this model the current repository of Ubuntu must be split into two repo's.

Stable Core Repo: Containing the core packages, the kernel, graphics stack, audio, desktop environment, and any applications tied a desktop environment, and the AT RELEASE VERSIONS OF APPLICATIONS. (KDE and Gnome core applications). (Ex: Unity, Compiz, PulseAudo, Mesa)

Rolling Application Repo: Containing non-core applications, releasing new versions as they are released by their respective authors. (EX: Libre Office, Firefox, Pymol)


The implementation of this proposal should not interfere with the current release model. Ubuntu can still release 6 month disk images and should continue development as normal. The core application will continue their 6 month testing and building cycle that Ubuntu values.

LITTLE WILL CHANGE FOR THE UBUNTU DEVELOPERS! (Read this three times)

The only change is that non-core applications will be compiled and added the Application repo as they come out. This can be automated, using a server set up to build new versions of applications. So, will not be a big usage of Canonical/community developers. This would also reduce the back porting work done currently by Ubuntu developers since the new application version will contain the security updates. This could reduce the work for Ubuntu developers.

In order to allow users a choice, the update manager can have a button that can be toggled from AT RELEASE and Non-Core Application Rolling. The change between each option will be a simply adding the second repo or removing it and rolling back to the AT RELEASE application versions. That way the user can decide if they want to keep total application stability or if they want new applications.



(NOTE): I am not the best at describing my ideas, so if you don't understand any of this, ask me, or look at Chakra Linux's FAQ on the rolling distro concept.

See the 1 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 20 Jun 11 at 15:08) >>

It is difficult to upgrade and install programs without internet  
Written by nyaggi the 28 Jan 11 at 12:17. Already implemented
It is very difficult to install or update programs if no other computer with Ubuntu.
0
votes
closed
Solution #1: update-manager hybrid for windows
Written by nyaggi the 28 Jan 11 at 12:17.
Give update-manager the ability to generate an updater that can run from windows taking into account the update packages. Update-manager reads the repositories, check for updates and generates the exe for windows. In windows you run the executable and down the updates. Update-manager reads the results and updated ubuntu.
0
votes
closed
Solution #2: Offline-Update-Manager
Written by nyaggi the 28 Jan 11 at 12:20.
Create a new program that performs the steps of the previous point
0
votes
closed
Solution #3: Other Os
Written by nyaggi the 28 Jan 11 at 12:25.
Create a new program to perform the steps above but with versions for Mac and Windows.

See the 1 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 28 Jan 11 at 16:43) >>

2 3 4 5 Next >>