Written by flooted the 5 Nov 12 at 22:27.
Already implemented
When I installed 12.10 on my crappy old HP the wifi didn't work and the graphics were all over the place. I spent ages trying to fix the problems, got wifi working but the graphics just crashed all the time. So I went back to 12.04 after wasting a good few days looking for solutions on the internet.
Written by manuelciosici the 31 May 12 at 20:26.
Already implemented
As Ubuntu use becomes more spread people with a wide variety of technical skills start using it. Ubuntu's constant stream of updates might become confusing for non technical users and which will feel frustration, confusion and then just ignore the updates.
Having users on a wide variety of software versions causes fragmentation of the entire platform and can open security holes in their systems.
Written by japr the 6 Apr 12 at 07:36.
Already implemented
On every version of Ubuntu I have used, the Update Manager pops-up by default and it's never quite the right time to do so. Result: I end up not updating as frequently as I should.
Written by hans00 the 8 Nov 11 at 01:12.
Already implemented
When updating packages through Update Manager, packages that fail to download are not handled well, and the entire update can fail due to a few failed packages.
Motivating example: When doing an update of 208 packages, I ran into the following errors:
Update failed
In all, 28 packages failed to download, and trying again resulted in the same failure. I was able to work around the issue by unselecting the failed packages and then retrying.
Written by turbolad the 26 Jun 11 at 12:30.
Already implemented
Why is it necessary to upgrade Ubuntu just to fix a few trivial programs? As an example, I could not install Ubuntu version 11.04 on a friend's PC (the Nvidia graphics driver was VERY problematic on Ubuntu version 11.04), but Ubuntu 10.10 did not have that problem - however a few programs such as the game "Lights Off" don't work in Ubuntu version 10.10. This is why I'm asking: is it really necessary to upgrade Ubuntu just to get the fixes for programs such as the "Lights Off" game?
Why not deliver the fixes via the Update Manager instead of forcing the user to upgrade the entire operating system?
Written by dh04000 the 20 Jun 11 at 01:36.
Already implemented
The current release model of Ubuntu trap users with outdated and unsupported applications that have security issues. Forcing users to under go the disruptive process of installing a new version of Ubuntu every 6 months just to have access to new versions of applications is hard on users. Especially new linux converts whom are used to the self-updating application model found on Mac and Windows.
Problems with Current Ubuntu release model:
-Difficulty for Users to access updated applications
-Security Issues related to out-dated applications due to opensource model of putting security and bug updates in the newest release only.
-PPA's not User Friendly, Hard for New Users, Not intended for keep application updated.
Benefits of Half-Rolling Model
-Up to date applications
-Better application security
-Better Usability
-Matches the expectations of new users and industry used to the Mac and Windows model of a stable core and updating applications.
-Maintains stability of Ubuntu, unlike a real rolling distro.