Ubuntu QA:
BlogBrainstormPackage status
Log in
Ubuntu QA
Live CD installer
Idea sandbox Idea sandbox
Popular ideas Popular ideas
Ideas in development Ideas in development
Implemented ideas Implemented ideas

Contributor turbolad on Live CD installer

UEFI secure boot: the Microsoft 'requirement' could lock-out Ubuntu!  
Written by turbolad the 16 Feb 12 at 12:49. Not an idea
The UEFI "secure boot" is designed to stop malware from hiding in the BIOS, before the operating system boots, by only allowing "approved" code to run. If the Microsoft secure boot 'requirement' on ARM computers is approved, this would prevent Linux distributions like Ubuntu being installed either alongside Windows or replacing Windows.

See:
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/microsoft-to-lock-out-other-operating-sys tems-from-windows-8-arm-pcs-devices/10132?tag=content;siu-container

This is anti-competitive and should not be allowed.
0
votes
closed
Solution #1: Ubuntu/Canonical Ltd. should complain to the European Commission about this
Written by turbolad the 16 Feb 12 at 12:49.
As per title.

If the Microsoft secure boot specification is implemented on ARM computers, it would make it impossible to install other operating systems.
This is unfair and it would prevent Ubuntu being installed on such computers.

See the 2 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 17 Feb 12 at 14:11) >>

Restricted extras: confusion when installing Ubuntu  
Written by turbolad the 30 Jul 11 at 21:44. Won't implement
Problem: when installing Ubuntu, you have the option to install propriety extras. Confusingly, if the user wants the restricted extras installed e.g. Flash Player, Microsoft fonts etc. then the user must install these restricted extras AFTER Ubuntu has been installed.

I'm writing this idea to hopefully clear up the confusion which inexperienced users face when installing Ubuntu; they will assume that restricted extras have already been installed DURING the Ubuntu installation (if they ticked/checked the right boxes), when in fact this is NOT the case!
0
votes
closed
Solution #1: Have an extra option to install restricted extras
Written by turbolad the 30 Jul 11 at 21:44.
As the Ubuntu installation already offers users' the option to install propriety components, why not allow the user to install ALL of the restricted extras during the installation of Ubuntu? If that means accepting licence agreements, it's easy for the user to read them and either accept or reject.

Note: the installer could remind the user that restricted extras can be installed with the "Software Centre" if there is no Internet connection available when installing Ubuntu.

See the 4 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 8 Aug 11 at 18:48) >>