Well, my suggestion is that, together with the donations, there should be a visible link redirecting to other ways to contribute and get involved with Ubuntu.
I say this because of course we all would like to donate to projects such as Wikipedia, LibreOffice, our favorite distro, GNOME, in the end there is no money for all that.
However, sometimes we do have a bit of spare time which can be applied on contributing to Ubuntu, so yes, I think it makes sense to suggest, right below the donations, other ways for any user, even without tech skills, help to make Ubuntu better.
Many users are now donating to their favorite online services using the bitcoin currency. Only offering PayPal as a way to donate will cause a loss of some potential donors who are willing to donate using Bitcoin.
Operation system (OS) knows about current i/o file operation (like start of file operation (creating, copying, renaming and others), end of file operation). Why not have a separate database (like mlocate.db) for file (directory) structure, records which would reflect fully current file (directory) structure and updates at every file operation? This update could be realized in function called by the signal of OS at i/o operation. As a result we'll have all "beauties" of database using:
1) Very quick file search (by size, name etc., include regexp).
2) Very quick showing directories size.
3) Increasing file system (fs) reliability due to the actual duplication of it's structure.
4) Using various sums (like crc, md5, sha, ...), stored as a separate field of file properties in database.
5) Possibility of quick coping and backuping of all file (directory) structure.
6) No need to periodically directory scan (like it do mlocatedb).
7) And many many others benefits...
Using of this approach DON'T INCREASE processor loading. This "paralleling" of fs structure could be realized for existing fs.
By the author opinion, fs structure "paralleling" in separate database must be a standard for new versions of fs ("DB Linked FS").
Transmission, Utorrent and most torrent clients now have this feature because this is future ;) Torrent files is history now. Most popular torrent sites now support magnet links, for example ThePirateBay ;)
The default Ubuntu homepage (http://start.ubuntu.com/current/) could be a lot more useful and customisable displaying your personal information, updates aswell as the current search box (e.g., google, yahoo, duckduckgo).... similar to iGoogle
I am php developer and we are creating web portals based on CMS, we had older projects that are running on php 5.2.5 and 5.2... 5.3... versions, so it would be useful has some utility to switch and install different versions of php
Ubuntu Countdown page: http://www.ubuntu.com/community/countdown provides users with banners that announce the time remaining to next Ubuntu release. By using dynamically generated images, the texts could be localized.
A simple idea, which may change the world. Why not standardize, an on-line chart, showing the best, of the best (user ratings?) native productivity applications (dynamically upgraded database), and exactly how they map to familiar Windows (and OS-X) programs! This would be a click; from the Ubuntu (and every distribution) site, and available from from every live, and installed desktop!
Selection of "Support" at the top of the page or "Get Support" at the bottom of the page both result in a page being shown where it states "...ask the people in our active forums". There is NO link on this page for "FORUMS".
The user must GUESS that "Community" is where he should go to find a link to forums and he has to GUESS that clicking on "Support" there will get him where he wants to go.
I've not found a simple guide to Ubuntu desktop security on the Ubuntu website.
I would like to know (and other users may wish to know):
*Does Ubuntu need anti-virus software?
*Does Ubuntu need a firewall?
*How to make Ubuntu pass the "Shields Up" security test on the grc.com website for full stealthing.
*How safe is Ubuntu desktop when using an "always on" internet connection?
and other questions, especially for users who have been familiar with using Windows and installing 3rd party security suites; apparently, Linux does not need anti-virus software for home users?
The Ubuntu website could really do with marketing Ubuntu a lot better than it does now. Such a great product - Ubuntu - is not being praised enough.