Ubuntu QA:
BlogBrainstormPackage status
Log in
Ubuntu QA
Sound Juicer
Idea sandbox Idea sandbox
Popular ideas Popular ideas
Ideas in development Ideas in development
Implemented ideas Implemented ideas

Contributor cheesehead on Sound Juicer

Different Sound Mixer  
Written by Prominence the 15 Sep 08 at 03:47. New
Wasn't sure what to name this exactly, but the idea is to get a volume mixer for Ubuntu that is like Vista's (don't stop reading hear me out, this isn't another Make-Ubuntu-like-[insert name of OS here] thing.)

Like how you could control individual applications and their volumes or mute them. I loved this, mute Firefox and continue playing your music or something. Just an idea.
-7
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #13226
Written by Prominence the 15 Sep 08 at 03:47.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #13226 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 1 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 27 Jul 09 at 15:47) >>

Multiple CD Album ripping - continuous track numbers  
Written by fluteflute the 7 Oct 08 at 17:54. New
Whilst media players such as Rhythmbox are able to cope with the disc number metadata (and play tracks in the correct order), other devices/programs such as MP3 players which use sorted filenames play all the track ones, then all the track twos, etc.

With albums with multiple CDs I would like the track number vaules for the subsequent CDs to not start again at '1' but continue. This functionality would only be enabled when the value in 'disc' is greater than one. Then the previous CD's ripped files could be looked at to find the track number needed to start on.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555433
-10
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #14191
Written by fluteflute the 7 Oct 08 at 17:54.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #14191 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 1 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 8 Oct 08 at 00:12) >>