Written by mr_mike the 16 Apr 12 at 03:43.
Global category: Internet & Networking.
New
Firewalls are extremely utilitarian devices. After you've owned one for a while and perhaps you have ten or fifteen thousand lines of rules configured on it, you are probably not looking forward to the day where your current firewall goes end of life and you need to buy a new one. If you are like me, and you want to be able to choose your new firewall based on other reasons instead of: "I chose this one because it was the same proprietary language my existing rule base is in, and my existing rule base is too big and it would be too cumbersome to re-engineer for a new vendor's syntax", then you would probably try to devise a way to automate this procedure.
When using Pidgin inside corporate network there is firewall that blocks almost all ports to the internet. So when Pidgin is using default ports to communicate to MSN, Google Talk, Yahoo etc firewall blocks ports and communication is not possible.
Pidgin has nice feature "Use HTTP Method" instead of default 1863 port when using MSN type of account. But for "Google Talk" there is no such option. I know Google Talk is able to communicate through http tunneling, because now I use Firefox web browser to communicate, but this approach has one limitation: the web browsers Google Talk web page has to be displayed and there is no notification if someone likes to talk to me.
Written by cmayoros the 29 Feb 08 at 04:07.
Global category: System.
New
Ubuntu should have a firewall installed in the default system and also include a simple to use program to administer it, very similar in approach to Fedora/CentOS.
Written by turbolad the 23 Dec 10 at 17:38.
Global category: Security.
New
This idea is no duplicate of any other...
Ubuntu needs a maximum-security firewall by configuring iptables, so home users don't have to install gufw, firestarter etc. and NOT KNOW that a firewall is running silently, so nobody can turn off the firewall accidentally (the firewall could be setup so it can only be turned off by editing files from the terminal).
Since home users tend to connect to the internet just for web browsing, checking e-mails, online gaming etc. and not normally using advanced networking, a "ready to use" firewall with maximum security would be ideal.
No information about this blueprint
Information is updated every 5 minutes.
Please wait till the next update.
Written by TWO the 19 Dec 08 at 12:57.
Global category: Security.
New
Currently, the Firestarter program requires that the user specifies an "Internet connected network device" and a "Local network connected device." Should the user happen to start the GUI whilst connected to the internet via an alternate device: For example, say that in Firestarter, your default connection is set to 'Ethernet Device (eth0)', but you one day happen to connect to the Internet via, say, 'Wireless Device (wlan0)', Firestarter GUI will display the error message: "Failed to start firewall. The device eth0 is not ready..." and shows a red circle and square indicating that it is not running, when it is ran after making the change to the network connection.
I think Firestarter should be monitoring all network connections automatically, so that the user doesn't have to change the setting each time they change the method by which they connect to the internet.
Also, is it not a bit of a security issue that the firewall fails to start on the basis that the program is not yet able to monitor all connections simultaneously?
Written by emil.s the 19 Jan 09 at 21:36.
Global category: Internet & Networking.
New
Since Ubuntu is IPv6 enabled by default, it will get an IPv6 unicast-address automatically when connected to an IPv6 enabled network.
ip(6)tables is installed by default, and it works fine for filtering IPv6.
But since most users prefer a GUI, which is Firestarter for Intrepid, it should support IPv6 for keeping the users safe.
Written by cdenley the 4 Sep 08 at 14:50.
Global category: Security.
New
There should be a tool available that can filter which applications are allowed to connect to the internet. It could warn you if the file trying to connect has been altered recently, but this might give a sense of false security since many applications rely on external libraries.
I realize that if users use good security practices and stick to open-source software from the repos, this shouldn't be necessary. However, it would be a powerful extra layer of security. Some people insist on using software from other sources, and it would be useful if you wanted to test if questionable software was phoning home. It would also put people with a windows mindset at ease, since that is the type of user ubuntu seems to target.
Written by nickr the 6 Jan 11 at 20:18.
Global category: Others.
New
Presently, Ubuntu users do not have a user-friendly way of controlling what applications can connect to the internet. They also do not have a user-friendly way of learning what applications are making internet connections.
Being able to stay abreast of and control outgoing internet connections provides users with increased privacy and security while giving them more control in general over the "comings and goings" on their computer. Having control over outgoing connections is also needed for financial reasons. I have to use a mobile-broadband connection for work. The mobile-broadband plans available to me all limit the amount of data I can use per month. To conserve as much broadband data usage as possible, it would be helpful to have global control over what applications can connect to the internet. With Microsoft Windows, this can be accomplished via an outgoing application-based firewall. Unfortunately, no such firewall exists for Ubuntu and there appears to be no way of globally blocking all applications from accessing the internet until they are given explicit permission by the user to connect. For example, if I am using Firefox to browse the web (I obviously need Firefox to have an internet connection), but if I then open Rhythmbox to simply listen to some mp3s on my hardrive while I am using Firefox, Rhythmbox will automatically establish an internet connection when it is opened. I don't need nor want Rhythmbox to connect to the internet unless it is specifically required for the task I'm trying to accomplish. Unnecessary connections it establishes are "wasting" the mobile-broadband data available to me for the month.
It seems to me that a solution to the problem will involve:
1.) some method for communicating an application's internet connections to the user.
2.) giving users control over if and when an application is allowed an internet connection. For example, when I start Rhythmbox, if it was to ask, "Can I connect to the internet now?" before connecting, I would have control over its connection behavior and I could give it permission when an internet connection is needed.
Written by obZen the 10 Dec 08 at 20:22.
Global category: Internet & Networking.
New
Create a Firewall that allows you to lead the applications that connect to Internet
By default it should be on with a pre-configuration for Ubuntu default apps
It should show you a pop up for the new apps that ask you if you want to leave the app to connect, and give you two options: Yes or No. This should create a permissive rule that after you could make it more restrictive in a rules manager
The rules manager should have a General rules tab, and a app rules tab, listing all the apps