Contributor Vahan Harutyunyan on the Quality category
It would be nice if in Nautilus ...
Written by l3on the 6 Sep 09 at 20:50.
Related project: Nautilus .
Not an idea
It would be nice in Nautilus ...
... when you select some files:
the info in the Properties window:
was also included in the sidebar:
563
votes
604
38
41
Solution #1:
Use the code
Written by
l3on the 6 Sep 09 at 20:50.
Insert some function calls at the Properties tab code in the Information sidebar.
Insert some function calls at the Properties tab code in the Information sidebar.
124
votes
181
63
57
Solution #2:
Copy only the general properties.
Written by
matthewp the 7 Sep 09 at 16:36.
This could easily be too much information, cluttering Nautilus and making it confusing. This goes against Gnome usability principles.
Instead, a few basic fields could be picked (perhaps the "General" section?), and those could be displayed. I.e., Show the title and duration, but not framerate or resolution.
This could easily be too much information, cluttering Nautilus and making it confusing. This goes against Gnome usability principles.
Instead, a few basic fields could be picked (perhaps the "General" section?), and those could be displayed. I.e., Show the title and duration, but not framerate or resolution.
151
votes
202
50
51
Solution #3:
Make the Nautilus-code more general so anything can go into the sidebar
See for example the side-bar of browsers like Firefox. So just let any code run in the sidebar (in a separate thread, so it can crash on its own). Output can be html or some specific xml, as long as perl-scripts can spit it out.
One serious problem with this solution is security, since the script is auto-run for each file/directory.
See for example the side-bar of browsers like Firefox. So just let any code run in the sidebar (in a separate thread, so it can crash on its own). Output can be html or some specific xml, as long as perl-scripts can spit it out.
One serious problem with this solution is security, since the script is auto-run for each file/directory.
476
votes
528
18
52
Solution #4:
Showing only important information
Written by
Klau3 the 7 Sep 09 at 18:51.
In most cases, the average user doesn't need more information, possibly the framerate, but not much more.
In most cases, the average user doesn't need more information, possibly the framerate, but not much more.
<img src="http://justoneidea.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/nautilus-information-sidebar.png" height="440" width="600" />
224
votes
265
22
41
Solution #5:
Implement Addons
The reason firefox and songbird for that matter have become so popular because they support addons, so any additional functionality can be implemented by users.
I think nautilus is a pretty stable product in itself but it lacks user-friendly aesthetic functinality. So for that addons can be implemented.
The reason firefox and songbird for that matter have become so popular because they support addons, so any additional functionality can be implemented by users.
I think nautilus is a pretty stable product in itself but it lacks user-friendly aesthetic functinality. So for that addons can be implemented.
255
votes
283
17
28
Solution #6:
Make this optional and configurable via preferences
Written by
LaMeR the 10 Sep 09 at 20:18.
1. Let the user set which information to show in the sidebar.
Example options:
For one selected file show in sidebar:
- General info - similar for most file types (thumbnail, type, size,...)
- File specific info - different for most file types (for example video files info: duration, resolution, bitrate, codec,...)
- All info = General info + File specific info
For multiple selected files show in sidebar:
- General info - number of files, size of files,...
- File specific info - number of files for each selected type (6 images, 13 videos,...), size of files for each selected type,...
- All info = General info + File specific info
2. Make it possible for user to completely turn this feature off, because some users may have slower computers or want to use the sidebar for bookmarks etc.
1. Let the user set which information to show in the sidebar.
Example options:
For one selected file show in sidebar:
- General info - similar for most file types (thumbnail, type, size,...)
- File specific info - different for most file types (for example video files info: duration, resolution, bitrate, codec,...)
- All info = General info + File specific info
For multiple selected files show in sidebar:
- General info - number of files, size of files,...
- File specific info - number of files for each selected type (6 images, 13 videos,...), size of files for each selected type,...
- All info = General info + File specific info
2. Make it possible for user to completely turn this feature off, because some users may have slower computers or want to use the sidebar for bookmarks etc.
49
votes
88
18
39
Solution #7:
sidebar should automatically change to "info" after selecting a file
I think that extra information is neat but it would be better if the left pane just changed automatically when I click on a file instead of having to choose "information" from the menu to see the details. the way I see it, most people like having the places view and they would have to change it to "information" each time to see the info just by left-clicking.
Now if nautilus would automatically change from places to information whenever you select a file then I think that would be very handy.
Optional extra idea: how about if that sidebar would show some other info automatically. For example, say I'm selecting many files from a folder, wouldn't it be neat if the sidebar would show me small thumbnails of all the items I have currently selected? (similar to Picasa's tray) That way it serves as a double check that I'm actually copying all the files I need. Then after pasting the sidebar would just go back to show the "places"option.
As it is right now, not many people are using that drop down menu. It's sad since now that I tried it I see it can be useful and even more if the feature you are requesting is implemented. Still, I don't think I would be using "information" as my default sidebar BUT if it was automatic as I mentioned above I think everyone will benefit from it.
what do you think? can that be done?
edit: As some users have suggested this feature should be configurable, allowing users to turn it off completely, showing only certain kind of information and generally behaving like users want it to behave.
I think that extra information is neat but it would be better if the left pane just changed automatically when I click on a file instead of having to choose "information" from the menu to see the details. the way I see it, most people like having the places view and they would have to change it to "information" each time to see the info just by left-clicking.
Now if nautilus would automatically change from places to information whenever you select a file then I think that would be very handy.
Optional extra idea: how about if that sidebar would show some other info automatically. For example, say I'm selecting many files from a folder, wouldn't it be neat if the sidebar would show me small thumbnails of all the items I have currently selected? (similar to Picasa's tray) That way it serves as a double check that I'm actually copying all the files I need. Then after pasting the sidebar would just go back to show the "places"option.
As it is right now, not many people are using that drop down menu. It's sad since now that I tried it I see it can be useful and even more if the feature you are requesting is implemented. Still, I don't think I would be using "information" as my default sidebar BUT if it was automatic as I mentioned above I think everyone will benefit from it.
what do you think? can that be done?
edit: As some users have suggested this feature should be configurable, allowing users to turn it off completely, showing only certain kind of information and generally behaving like users want it to behave.
-26
votes
47
20
73
Solution #8:
Dual pane capability
Written by
daashali the 14 Sep 09 at 05:55.
I think its better if nautilus can have the second pane like Krusader.This can increase productivity significantly. But implementing the second pane without proper shortcut keys like Dolphin is terrible.
I think its better if nautilus can have the second pane like Krusader.This can increase productivity significantly. But implementing the second pane without proper shortcut keys like Dolphin is terrible.
-104
votes
16
13
120
Solution #9:
Implement a second sidebar for information
Written by
daashali the 14 Sep 09 at 06:02.
I think its better to implement a second side bar on the left side for the purpose of showing information an previews. changing the sidebar functionality every time you want to view the information or traverse through file system is not such a good idea in my opinion.
I think its better to implement a second side bar on the left side for the purpose of showing information an previews. changing the sidebar functionality every time you want to view the information or traverse through file system is not such a good idea in my opinion.
-59
votes
18
9
77
Solution #10:
Show basic information below places view
Written by
daas88 the 14 Sep 09 at 20:16.
When using the places view it would be nice to have a small area for basic information in the lower part of the side pane. For example: file size, format, resolution, duration, framerate. Of course, it would depend on the file format.
And in my opinion no thumbnails or icons are needed, because nautilus already shows them.
When using the places view it would be nice to have a small area for basic information in the lower part of the side pane. For example: file size, format, resolution, duration, framerate. Of course, it would depend on the file format.
And in my opinion no thumbnails or icons are needed, because nautilus already shows them.
11
votes
14
4
3
Solution #11:
Make sidebar more dynamic
Written by
alx321 the 4 Oct 09 at 08:50.
Many ubuntu users don't even know that it is possible to change the content of the sidebar. The dropdown menu is very unhandy.
I propose to replace it by tabs with small icons and make it dynamic. That is, you can drag the tabs to another position, so that, for example, 'information' is shown beneath 'places' or in a second sidebar at the right or lower border.
Many ubuntu users don't even know that it is possible to change the content of the sidebar. The dropdown menu is very unhandy.
I propose to replace it by tabs with small icons and make it dynamic. That is, you can drag the tabs to another position, so that, for example, 'information' is shown beneath 'places' or in a second sidebar at the right or lower border.
8
votes
8
5
0
Solution #12:
Combination of "Use the Code" and "Optional and Configurable via Preferences"
Combine "Use the Code" solution with the option to configure it.
Combine "Use the Code" solution with the option to configure it.
4
votes
6
2
2
Solution #13:
Add nautilus option to show file info in a popup bubble
I propose to add a Nautilus option to pop up a light yellow bubble with basic file info when the mouse rests on an icon for a second or so.
The option should be very simple: on/off or none/brief/verbose. The file-type decides what info is shown.
Advantages:
* no mouse click needed
* no second/dynamic/changing pane needed
* plays well together with the audio preview feature
* the mouse is on one icon at a time => the info is clearly related
I propose to add a Nautilus option to pop up a light yellow bubble with basic file info when the mouse rests on an icon for a second or so.
The option should be very simple: on/off or none/brief/verbose. The file-type decides what info is shown.
Advantages:
* no mouse click needed
* no second/dynamic/changing pane needed
* plays well together with the audio preview feature
* the mouse is on one icon at a time => the info is clearly related
auto correct typos in terminal
Written by marbertone the 4 Dec 10 at 18:20.
Global category: Quality.
New
My idea is to develop an automatic tool that corrects typos in terminal due to fast typing.
Example:
cd rpg
instead of 'cd prg'
hence the tool will fastly understand that rpg folder doesn't exist, instead of trying to understand which package rpg should be...
actually I work a lot in terminal, and especially when some programs are running in background, writing 'cd rpg' will cost something like 5 seconds to the pc to understand that rpg folder doesn't exist, which are an eternity for "fast-typers".
I think it could be really useful, perhaps with an auto-completion tool (I start typing and - as in google - terminal suggests me what to type, especially in the case of typos, maybe changing color).
Hope it could be useful!
Cheers,
MA
Keeping the time accurate over the Internet by default
Written by turbolad the 5 Jul 10 at 16:33.
Global category: Quality.
Implemented
Computer clocks will become inaccurate if not synchronised with time servers using an internet connection. Everyday computer users probably don't know that you can configure Ubuntu to keep your computer's clock accurate when connected to the Internet.
405
votes
439
7
34
Selected solution (#1):
By default, synchronise the computer's clock with time servers
Written by
turbolad the 5 Jul 10 at 16:33.
By default, in the next release of Ubuntu and thereafter, automatically synchronise the computer's clock over the Internet. This has several benefits: Ubuntu needs less configuration after install, newbies have the time kept accurate without any intervention, it's one less thing to remember when you install Ubuntu and so on.
Having everything ready and set up for users makes them feel more comfortable using Ubuntu. It is said that Ubuntu "just works", which is what people like. No hassle, no fuss.
By default, in the next release of Ubuntu and thereafter, automatically synchronise the computer's clock over the Internet. This has several benefits: Ubuntu needs less configuration after install, newbies have the time kept accurate without any intervention, it's one less thing to remember when you install Ubuntu and so on.
Having everything ready and set up for users makes them feel more comfortable using Ubuntu. It is said that Ubuntu "just works", which is what people like. No hassle, no fuss.
111
votes
149
31
38
Selected solution (#2):
Provide as option with checkbox for time sync with online servers
This option should be given as optional option because every user did not use internet on daily basis.
This option should be given as optional option because every user did not use internet on daily basis.
47
votes
93
25
46
Selected solution (#3):
Give the user the choice to sync with a time server when installing
Include this option as a check box when the user chooses his/her location on the world map.
Include this option as a check box when the user chooses his/her location on the world map.
Software Center in Unity
Written by AndersLund2011 the 8 Apr 11 at 08:46.
Related project: Ubuntu Software Center .
Won't implement
I really like the Natty Unity interface because it is much easier to find and install new programs, but I fell over that the software center is not necessary when installing a new program, it just involves an extra step and it does not look nearly as good as the dash interface. So my proposal is:
-54
votes
11
6
65
Solution #1:
Integrate the software centre into dash
Integrate the software centre into dash, so that it is possible to install a program directly from the dash.
Integrate the software centre into dash, so that it is possible to install a program directly from the dash.
33
votes
42
6
9
Solution #2:
Keep USC as a separate application, but put an icon for it on the main Dash page
Written by
Kasoroth the 17 Jul 11 at 18:26.
The main page of the Dash currently has four application icons on its bottom row:
Browse the Web
View Photos
Check Email
Listen to Music
All of these tasks launch default applications that users are likely to have on their launcher already anyway, making this area quite redundant.
I would suggest replacing these 4 icons (or leaving them and adding a third row of icons) with:
Ubuntu Software Center
System Settings (which is not very discoverable where it is now)
Ubuntu One (Synchronize data between computers)
Printing (or Help)
These are all things that most users will not need to access frequently enough to warrant a place on the launcher, but they should be in a place that is easily discoverable by a new user, and they should be in a place that is consistent, so they can be conveniently referred to when trying to assist new users without worrying that the user may have moved or removed them. The main page of the Dash seems perfectly suited for this role.
The main page of the Dash currently has four application icons on its bottom row:
Browse the Web
View Photos
Check Email
Listen to Music
All of these tasks launch default applications that users are likely to have on their launcher already anyway, making this area quite redundant.
I would suggest replacing these 4 icons (or leaving them and adding a third row of icons) with:
Ubuntu Software Center
System Settings (which is not very discoverable where it is now)
Ubuntu One (Synchronize data between computers)
Printing (or Help)
These are all things that most users will not need to access frequently enough to warrant a place on the launcher, but they should be in a place that is easily discoverable by a new user, and they should be in a place that is consistent, so they can be conveniently referred to when trying to assist new users without worrying that the user may have moved or removed them. The main page of the Dash seems perfectly suited for this role.
Add name of the last person that has added command to Brainstorm idea
Written by grofaty the 18 Apr 09 at 11:05.
Related project: brainstorm.ubuntu.com .
Category: Website structure.
New
When commands are added to Brainstorm there is message at the bottom of all ideas, e.g. "See the 6 comments or propose a solution". I see no last user posted the comment. It is especially annoying for ideas I have posted. Because there is no such "last user that added comment" info I don't know if there are some new posts.
353
votes
384
35
31
Solution #1:
Make it better looking and more orginized
Totally change the interface of it to show more info, telling average users simple but important info and enhancing it with features like:
- Show the importance of the update, with colored circles or boxes showing how important it is
- Group them into tabs (according to their sub-menu in the Gnome Menu's hierarchy), like [Overview][Accessories][Games][Graphics] and so on.
- Tell the users the new features of the upgrade
- Tell the users if the update will require any restarts of anything in advance.
Totally change the interface of it to show more info, telling average users simple but important info and enhancing it with features like:
- Show the importance of the update, with colored circles or boxes showing how important it is
- Group them into tabs (according to their sub-menu in the Gnome Menu's hierarchy), like [Overview][Accessories][Games][Graphics] and so on.
- Tell the users the new features of the upgrade
- Tell the users if the update will require any restarts of anything in advance.
266
votes
278
21
12
Solution #2:
Work on "AppCenter"
Written by
Rodrigo the 7 Aug 09 at 16:34.
Looking at the ideas of the past days I came across one that pointed me towards this:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppCenter
please have a look.
I think is a great idea.
38
votes
68
18
30
Solution #3:
Group related updates together
Most users don't need to know the names of all the packages that are being upgraded. It might make things look less scary if, say, all the security-related updates were lumped together into one item in the Update Manager. And not just group those updates together -- I mean *completely hide* the names of all the security-related upgrades, so the user only sees *one* security-related item in the list.
Power users should still be able to get a list of what each update contains. But regular users shouldn't be overwhelmed with 50 different package names, when all they need to know is that there's 37 MB of system upgrades, 2 MB of security patches, and a new version of Firefox.
Most users don't need to know the names of all the packages that are being upgraded. It might make things look less scary if, say, all the security-related updates were lumped together into one item in the Update Manager. And not just group those updates together -- I mean *completely hide* the names of all the security-related upgrades, so the user only sees *one* security-related item in the list.
Power users should still be able to get a list of what each update contains. But regular users shouldn't be overwhelmed with 50 different package names, when all they need to know is that there's 37 MB of system upgrades, 2 MB of security patches, and a new version of Firefox.
-33
votes
6
17
39
Solution #4:
Organize related things better
When you go to install programs or updates, they are not in order, which could cause someone to possibly install the wrong upgrade or application that may cause problems in the future. I propose that categories should be made organize data so you can find exactly what you're looking for.
When you go to install programs or updates, they are not in order, which could cause someone to possibly install the wrong upgrade or application that may cause problems in the future. I propose that categories should be made organize data so you can find exactly what you're looking for.
-49
votes
28
6
77
Solution #5:
Update on Shutdown Option
AppCenter is quite a neat idea, they should work on an option for that to update just before the computer shuts down rather than slowing your computer down while you're using it. This option should be disabled by default.
AppCenter is quite a neat idea, they should work on an option for that to update just before the computer shuts down rather than slowing your computer down while you're using it. This option should be disabled by default.
-12
votes
3
7
15
Solution #6:
Only group packages with same changes text
(Similar but not equal to #3!)
The Update Manager lists updatable packages. Below the list you can unfold a text field that describes what changed in the currently selected package.
I propose to group together all packages that have the very same text of changes! Each package should still be un/checkable for updating individually. But only a whole group should be selectable. Further the context menu in the list could also show "Check Group" and "Uncheck Group".
In contrast to #3 no info is hidden! I even miss the total number of updatable packages that Gutsy or Feisty once had shown.
(Similar but not equal to #3!)
The Update Manager lists updatable packages. Below the list you can unfold a text field that describes what changed in the currently selected package.
I propose to group together all packages that have the very same text of changes! Each package should still be un/checkable for updating individually. But only a whole group should be selectable. Further the context menu in the list could also show "Check Group" and "Uncheck Group".
In contrast to #3 no info is hidden! I even miss the total number of updatable packages that Gutsy or Feisty once had shown.
-11
votes
10
6
21
Solution #7:
Fine as it is
It is currently simple, straightforward, and concise.
It is currently simple, straightforward, and concise.
-6
votes
8
4
14
Solution #8:
No more code-rot please!
I agree that the existing system is quite poor.
I should not see so much mess in the app list. Searching for a specific app to install also should never return Beta or Source unless I've chosen to see those.
I'm 100% against AppCenter!
One of the most irritating things about Linux is all of the abandoned/orphaned/code-rot apps. How many different apps like this do we need and must we have installed?
Please do not release a different app to manage this, the source exists for the other apps, just take the best one and update it to a new version that has the required features.
There should never be multiple/duplicate/abandoned apps for the base OS... EVER!
I agree that the existing system is quite poor.
I should not see so much mess in the app list. Searching for a specific app to install also should never return Beta or Source unless I've chosen to see those.
I'm 100% against AppCenter!
One of the most irritating things about Linux is all of the abandoned/orphaned/code-rot apps. How many different apps like this do we need and must we have installed?
Please do not release a different app to manage this, the source exists for the other apps, just take the best one and update it to a new version that has the required features.
There should never be multiple/duplicate/abandoned apps for the base OS... EVER!
Non-LTS (Long Term Support) versions should be "beta" and used to create new LTS
Written by turbolad the 6 Feb 11 at 01:41.
Related project: Update manager .
Not an idea
LTS versions of Ubuntu are released every 2 years on even-numbered years in the month of April. Between LTS releases, savvy users could test the non-LTS versions and report problems, so the LTS releases contain all the fixes RATHER THAN NEW FEATURES - which haven't been beta-tested. If it sounds confusing, let me explain briefly:
By default, the Update Manager tells users when LTS upgrade versions of Ubuntu are available. If the user wishes to upgrade to non-LTS versions at least every 6 months by selecting the option "Normal releases" in the "Updates" tab, they would have changed the DEFAULT setting in the Update Manager (or they may download the new Ubuntu .iso files if installing cleanly), so they are more likely to be experienced users of Ubuntu who don't mind installing the new Ubuntu OS regularly.
By building the LTS version from previously beta-tested releases, non-technical users and newbies are far less likely to experience problems after upgrading.
-16
votes
3
3
19
Solution #1:
Non-LTS versions should be classed as "beta" to help build next LTS release
Written by
turbolad the 6 Feb 11 at 01:41.
Given the default setup is for users to be informed of LTS releases, non-LTS should be classed as "beta" and new features added to these "beta" releases. When problems are discovered, reported and fixed - THEN add these features to the next LTS version. This would greatly reduce the problems users may experience when they have to upgrade, such as regressions (when a program or hardware device worked in the previous version of Ubuntu, but does not work in the next version) and so on.
An alternative is to show a warning message box to users if they change the Update Manager settings for "Normal releases" or try installing a non-LTS release cleanly.
Given the default setup is for users to be informed of LTS releases, non-LTS should be classed as "beta" and new features added to these "beta" releases. When problems are discovered, reported and fixed - THEN add these features to the next LTS version. This would greatly reduce the problems users may experience when they have to upgrade, such as regressions (when a program or hardware device worked in the previous version of Ubuntu, but does not work in the next version) and so on.
An alternative is to show a warning message box to users if they change the Update Manager settings for "Normal releases" or try installing a non-LTS release cleanly.
-13
votes
2
0
15
Solution #2:
Provide updates for each LTS release for at least 6 years or maybe longer.
Written by
turbolad the 7 Feb 11 at 15:55.
A computer can be used with the same version of Ubuntu and users won't feel forced to upgrade Ubuntu, as this can cause problems...
Upgrading sometimes breaks programs or stops hardware devices working (sometimes things like power management stop working), which worked fine in the previous Ubuntu.
Please read my lengthy comment to see why users - who are familiar with Microsoft Windows - would find this solution more comfortable.
A computer can be used with the same version of Ubuntu and users won't feel forced to upgrade Ubuntu, as this can cause problems...
Upgrading sometimes breaks programs or stops hardware devices working (sometimes things like power management stop working), which worked fine in the previous Ubuntu.
Please read my lengthy comment to see why users - who are familiar with Microsoft Windows - would find this solution more comfortable.