Contributor germclown on Nautilus
It would be nice if in Nautilus ...
Written by l3on the 6 Sep 09 at 20:50.
Not an idea
It would be nice in Nautilus ...
... when you select some files:
the info in the Properties window:
was also included in the sidebar:
563
votes
604
38
41
124
votes
181
63
57
Solution #2:
Copy only the general properties.
Written by
matthewp the 7 Sep 09 at 16:36.
This could easily be too much information, cluttering Nautilus and making it confusing. This goes against Gnome usability principles.
Instead, a few basic fields could be picked (perhaps the "General" section?), and those could be displayed. I.e., Show the title and duration, but not framerate or resolution.
This could easily be too much information, cluttering Nautilus and making it confusing. This goes against Gnome usability principles.
Instead, a few basic fields could be picked (perhaps the "General" section?), and those could be displayed. I.e., Show the title and duration, but not framerate or resolution.
151
votes
202
50
51
Solution #3:
Make the Nautilus-code more general so anything can go into the sidebar
See for example the side-bar of browsers like Firefox. So just let any code run in the sidebar (in a separate thread, so it can crash on its own). Output can be html or some specific xml, as long as perl-scripts can spit it out.
One serious problem with this solution is security, since the script is auto-run for each file/directory.
See for example the side-bar of browsers like Firefox. So just let any code run in the sidebar (in a separate thread, so it can crash on its own). Output can be html or some specific xml, as long as perl-scripts can spit it out.
One serious problem with this solution is security, since the script is auto-run for each file/directory.
476
votes
528
18
52
Solution #4:
Showing only important information
Written by
Klau3 the 7 Sep 09 at 18:51.
In most cases, the average user doesn't need more information, possibly the framerate, but not much more.
In most cases, the average user doesn't need more information, possibly the framerate, but not much more.
<img src="http://justoneidea.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/nautilus-information-sidebar.png" height="440" width="600" />
224
votes
265
22
41
Solution #5:
Implement Addons
The reason firefox and songbird for that matter have become so popular because they support addons, so any additional functionality can be implemented by users.
I think nautilus is a pretty stable product in itself but it lacks user-friendly aesthetic functinality. So for that addons can be implemented.
The reason firefox and songbird for that matter have become so popular because they support addons, so any additional functionality can be implemented by users.
I think nautilus is a pretty stable product in itself but it lacks user-friendly aesthetic functinality. So for that addons can be implemented.
255
votes
283
17
28
Solution #6:
Make this optional and configurable via preferences
Written by
LaMeR the 10 Sep 09 at 20:18.
1. Let the user set which information to show in the sidebar.
Example options:
For one selected file show in sidebar:
- General info - similar for most file types (thumbnail, type, size,...)
- File specific info - different for most file types (for example video files info: duration, resolution, bitrate, codec,...)
- All info = General info + File specific info
For multiple selected files show in sidebar:
- General info - number of files, size of files,...
- File specific info - number of files for each selected type (6 images, 13 videos,...), size of files for each selected type,...
- All info = General info + File specific info
2. Make it possible for user to completely turn this feature off, because some users may have slower computers or want to use the sidebar for bookmarks etc.
1. Let the user set which information to show in the sidebar.
Example options:
For one selected file show in sidebar:
- General info - similar for most file types (thumbnail, type, size,...)
- File specific info - different for most file types (for example video files info: duration, resolution, bitrate, codec,...)
- All info = General info + File specific info
For multiple selected files show in sidebar:
- General info - number of files, size of files,...
- File specific info - number of files for each selected type (6 images, 13 videos,...), size of files for each selected type,...
- All info = General info + File specific info
2. Make it possible for user to completely turn this feature off, because some users may have slower computers or want to use the sidebar for bookmarks etc.
49
votes
88
18
39
Solution #7:
sidebar should automatically change to "info" after selecting a file
I think that extra information is neat but it would be better if the left pane just changed automatically when I click on a file instead of having to choose "information" from the menu to see the details. the way I see it, most people like having the places view and they would have to change it to "information" each time to see the info just by left-clicking.
Now if nautilus would automatically change from places to information whenever you select a file then I think that would be very handy.
Optional extra idea: how about if that sidebar would show some other info automatically. For example, say I'm selecting many files from a folder, wouldn't it be neat if the sidebar would show me small thumbnails of all the items I have currently selected? (similar to Picasa's tray) That way it serves as a double check that I'm actually copying all the files I need. Then after pasting the sidebar would just go back to show the "places"option.
As it is right now, not many people are using that drop down menu. It's sad since now that I tried it I see it can be useful and even more if the feature you are requesting is implemented. Still, I don't think I would be using "information" as my default sidebar BUT if it was automatic as I mentioned above I think everyone will benefit from it.
what do you think? can that be done?
edit: As some users have suggested this feature should be configurable, allowing users to turn it off completely, showing only certain kind of information and generally behaving like users want it to behave.
I think that extra information is neat but it would be better if the left pane just changed automatically when I click on a file instead of having to choose "information" from the menu to see the details. the way I see it, most people like having the places view and they would have to change it to "information" each time to see the info just by left-clicking.
Now if nautilus would automatically change from places to information whenever you select a file then I think that would be very handy.
Optional extra idea: how about if that sidebar would show some other info automatically. For example, say I'm selecting many files from a folder, wouldn't it be neat if the sidebar would show me small thumbnails of all the items I have currently selected? (similar to Picasa's tray) That way it serves as a double check that I'm actually copying all the files I need. Then after pasting the sidebar would just go back to show the "places"option.
As it is right now, not many people are using that drop down menu. It's sad since now that I tried it I see it can be useful and even more if the feature you are requesting is implemented. Still, I don't think I would be using "information" as my default sidebar BUT if it was automatic as I mentioned above I think everyone will benefit from it.
what do you think? can that be done?
edit: As some users have suggested this feature should be configurable, allowing users to turn it off completely, showing only certain kind of information and generally behaving like users want it to behave.
-26
votes
47
20
73
Solution #8:
Dual pane capability
Written by
daashali the 14 Sep 09 at 05:55.
I think its better if nautilus can have the second pane like Krusader.This can increase productivity significantly. But implementing the second pane without proper shortcut keys like Dolphin is terrible.
I think its better if nautilus can have the second pane like Krusader.This can increase productivity significantly. But implementing the second pane without proper shortcut keys like Dolphin is terrible.
-104
votes
16
13
120
Solution #9:
Implement a second sidebar for information
Written by
daashali the 14 Sep 09 at 06:02.
I think its better to implement a second side bar on the left side for the purpose of showing information an previews. changing the sidebar functionality every time you want to view the information or traverse through file system is not such a good idea in my opinion.
I think its better to implement a second side bar on the left side for the purpose of showing information an previews. changing the sidebar functionality every time you want to view the information or traverse through file system is not such a good idea in my opinion.
-59
votes
18
9
77
Solution #10:
Show basic information below places view
Written by
daas88 the 14 Sep 09 at 20:16.
When using the places view it would be nice to have a small area for basic information in the lower part of the side pane. For example: file size, format, resolution, duration, framerate. Of course, it would depend on the file format.
And in my opinion no thumbnails or icons are needed, because nautilus already shows them.
When using the places view it would be nice to have a small area for basic information in the lower part of the side pane. For example: file size, format, resolution, duration, framerate. Of course, it would depend on the file format.
And in my opinion no thumbnails or icons are needed, because nautilus already shows them.
11
votes
14
4
3
Solution #11:
Make sidebar more dynamic
Written by
alx321 the 4 Oct 09 at 08:50.
Many ubuntu users don't even know that it is possible to change the content of the sidebar. The dropdown menu is very unhandy.
I propose to replace it by tabs with small icons and make it dynamic. That is, you can drag the tabs to another position, so that, for example, 'information' is shown beneath 'places' or in a second sidebar at the right or lower border.
Many ubuntu users don't even know that it is possible to change the content of the sidebar. The dropdown menu is very unhandy.
I propose to replace it by tabs with small icons and make it dynamic. That is, you can drag the tabs to another position, so that, for example, 'information' is shown beneath 'places' or in a second sidebar at the right or lower border.
8
votes
8
5
0
Solution #12:
Combination of "Use the Code" and "Optional and Configurable via Preferences"
Combine "Use the Code" solution with the option to configure it.
Combine "Use the Code" solution with the option to configure it.
4
votes
6
2
2
Solution #13:
Add nautilus option to show file info in a popup bubble
I propose to add a Nautilus option to pop up a light yellow bubble with basic file info when the mouse rests on an icon for a second or so.
The option should be very simple: on/off or none/brief/verbose. The file-type decides what info is shown.
Advantages:
* no mouse click needed
* no second/dynamic/changing pane needed
* plays well together with the audio preview feature
* the mouse is on one icon at a time => the info is clearly related
I propose to add a Nautilus option to pop up a light yellow bubble with basic file info when the mouse rests on an icon for a second or so.
The option should be very simple: on/off or none/brief/verbose. The file-type decides what info is shown.
Advantages:
* no mouse click needed
* no second/dynamic/changing pane needed
* plays well together with the audio preview feature
* the mouse is on one icon at a time => the info is clearly related
125
votes
146
8
21
Solution #1:
Toolbar button with "open new tab"
Written by
ge0ffrey the 9 Aug 09 at 11:50.
Just click on the toolbar button and a new tab appears. Easy :)
There's still room in the toolbar.
Just click on the toolbar button and a new tab appears. Easy :)
There's still room in the toolbar.
50
votes
79
13
29
Solution #2:
Optionally always show tabs with I.E. like new tab button first
Written by
ge0ffrey the 9 Aug 09 at 12:08.
Like in Internet Exploder 7 and the Firefox with the tab extention: there a small button before the first or after the last tab which opens a new tab.
Like in Internet Exploder 7 and the Firefox with the tab extention: there a small button before the first or after the last tab which opens a new tab.
-21
votes
29
7
50
Solution #3:
Make double-click open a new tab
Written by
Otus the 10 Aug 09 at 14:29.
In Firefox, double-clicking the tab bar opens a new tab, middle clicking a tab closes it. Add same functionality to Nautilus to make the system behave consistently.
In Firefox, double-clicking the tab bar opens a new tab, middle clicking a tab closes it. Add same functionality to Nautilus to make the system behave consistently.
34
votes
70
8
36
Solution #4:
Have a "plus" button when no tabs are open
Written by
mac9416 the 11 Aug 09 at 01:12.
Like #2, but don't always have tabs. When no tabs are up, just have the "plus" button.
Like #2, but don't always have tabs. When no tabs are up, just have the "plus" button.
<a href="http://mac9416.keryxproject.org/images/nautilus-notabs.png"><img src="http://mac9416.keryxproject.org/images/nautilus-notabs_small.png" /></a>
78
votes
83
6
5
Solution #5:
Add the ability to click and drag tabs to rearrange them
Currently, if you want to re-arrange the order of the tabs you already have open, you have to close them and re-open them in the order you want them in. Adding the ability to drag the tabs to the order you want (like in Firefox) would be very helpful.
Currently, if you want to re-arrange the order of the tabs you already have open, you have to close them and re-open them in the order you want them in. Adding the ability to drag the tabs to the order you want (like in Firefox) would be very helpful.
13
votes
18
2
5
Solution #6:
Ctrl + Click
When the users Ctrl + Clicks on a folder it is opened in a new tab. This would be the same as firefox.
When the users Ctrl + Clicks on a folder it is opened in a new tab. This would be the same as firefox.
14
votes
14
1
0
Solution #7:
Provide the option to always show the tab bar
Written by
ryanli the 1 Sep 09 at 07:08.
As firefox does, there's an option for the user to choose whether to display the tab bar permanently. If the tab bar is always displayed, there should be a "plus" icon as solution #4 indicated.
As firefox does, there's an option for the user to choose whether to display the tab bar permanently. If the tab bar is always displayed, there should be a "plus" icon as solution #4 indicated.
Opening files with applications
Written by pubsbin the 8 Aug 09 at 04:13.
New
If you have a file, like a document or a picture, it's quite difficult to open it with some special application.
Example:
I have a drawing, MyFile.svg (scalable vector graphics). I have seen it but now i want to modify it, but Inkscape is not installed and therefore it doesm't appear in the "Open With" menu.
For opening MyFile.svg with Inkscape i have to:
- Open Add-Remove Applications
- Choose Inkscape and install it.
- Go back to the file and execute Open With.
This process could be simplified.
Solution #1:
Add possible installable applications in Open With Menu
Written by
pubsbin the 8 Aug 09 at 04:13.
The "Open With" menu, in addition of showing all the available applications, it could also have an option for
installing another related application and, once installed, opening the file with it.
In our case, the Open With menu for MyFile.svg would include an option
"Inkscape (must install)".
When choosed, Ubuntu will install Inkscape and then open the file. With one click.
The "Open With" menu, in addition of showing all the available applications, it could also have an option for
installing another related application and, once installed, opening the file with it.
In our case, the Open With menu for MyFile.svg would include an option
"Inkscape (must install)".
When choosed, Ubuntu will install Inkscape and then open the file. With one click.
Solution #2:
Similar to Solution #1, but make it a separate area
Instead of listing all the possible applications that could be used to open the file (xml is HUGE), simply adding a "search for other software to open this file" button which would then open a window showing software to install would enable the same functionality while keeping the original application selection window un-cluttered.
Instead of listing all the possible applications that could be used to open the file (xml is HUGE), simply adding a "search for other software to open this file" button which would then open a window showing software to install would enable the same functionality while keeping the original application selection window un-cluttered.
Solution #3:
Propose the "most used" option
Written by
Rodrigo the 9 Aug 09 at 20:25.
Ubuntu has feedback on user (well those that agree) so the "open with" could have something like:
- "the most used option by other users to open this kind of file is:" ZZZZZZ
or something similar.
That way if a user comes from a different OS, and does not know which program he/she has to use to open that file the system gives him a hint.
Ubuntu has feedback on user (well those that agree) so the "open with" could have something like:
- "the most used option by other users to open this kind of file is:" ZZZZZZ
or something similar.
That way if a user comes from a different OS, and does not know which program he/she has to use to open that file the system gives him a hint.
Solution #4:
Edit button in all viewing programs
Encourage all file-viewing programs to have an "edit" button. Edit button will open an installed program associated with that file. (This could have a dropdown a la Firefox Back/Forward if multiple options exist.) Failing that, a package manager will open with that file type as a search term. Search starts automatically. To help this, encourage devs to list files supported in a base install, and files supported through known plugins, as part of their package descriptions. Perhaps a notifier to explain the newly opened window.
This will only reduce the number of steps if the user is already viewing the file when they decide to edit it. But it will be significantly more user-friendly in all cases.
Encourage all file-viewing programs to have an "edit" button. Edit button will open an installed program associated with that file. (This could have a dropdown a la Firefox Back/Forward if multiple options exist.) Failing that, a package manager will open with that file type as a search term. Search starts automatically. To help this, encourage devs to list files supported in a base install, and files supported through known plugins, as part of their package descriptions. Perhaps a notifier to explain the newly opened window.
This will only reduce the number of steps if the user is already viewing the file when they decide to edit it. But it will be significantly more user-friendly in all cases.
Solution #5:
Install applications on-demand. File extension based.
Comes from
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/24921/
1.- On the repositories, each available application publishes which file extensions is able to work with.
2.- At home, user double-clicks a file with an extension for which there is not an application associated to in his system. Eg: ".rar".
3.- Ubuntu offers a number of applications that claim to be able to work with that extension. The most popular is pre-selected.
4.- User clicks "Next", system asks for password, user enters the password, system installs the application, system associates the ".rar" extension with that application, and finally system opens that file with that application.
This is application installing on-demand. Maybe not feasible in proprietary systems. Why not on Ubuntu?
Comes from
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/24921/
1.- On the repositories, each available application publishes which file extensions is able to work with.
2.- At home, user double-clicks a file with an extension for which there is not an application associated to in his system. Eg: ".rar".
3.- Ubuntu offers a number of applications that claim to be able to work with that extension. The most popular is pre-selected.
4.- User clicks "Next", system asks for password, user enters the password, system installs the application, system associates the ".rar" extension with that application, and finally system opens that file with that application.
This is application installing on-demand. Maybe not feasible in proprietary systems. Why not on Ubuntu?
Solution #6:
Add right-click menu option: Open with > search in USC
This function could be implemented as an extension to the Ubuntu Software Centre.
The user would right click a file and find as first submenu of "Open with": "search USC for compatible apps".
if clicked, the results in USC for that extension are displayed on screen.
Some short description of the extension specifications could also be provided.
The Ubuntu team would also be relieved of the task of choosing "the app" for any file extension.
A great advantage is also that using the apt-based USC, all additional repositories that an user may have added, are taken into consideration.
This function could be implemented as an extension to the Ubuntu Software Centre.
The user would right click a file and find as first submenu of "Open with": "search USC for compatible apps".
if clicked, the results in USC for that extension are displayed on screen.
Some short description of the extension specifications could also be provided.
The Ubuntu team would also be relieved of the task of choosing "the app" for any file extension.
A great advantage is also that using the apt-based USC, all additional repositories that an user may have added, are taken into consideration.
Provide ipod and smartphone browsing capability in nautilus
Written by mahajanudit the 10 Sep 09 at 11:58.
New
When I say browsing capability, i don't mean browse the contents of their partition but the way ipod is accessed by music players like songbird, amarok etc or like smartphones or anyother phone is accessed though their pc suite.
This will eliminate the overhead need for multimedia developer these functionalities and also will ease the user experience as no additional software will be needed to access their devices.
Solution #1:
Remove the icon and display a warning when an external drive isn't unmounted
I would propose removing the icon on the desktop and displaying a notification (using an alert box, because notify-osd is too transient) along the lines of this.
I would propose removing the icon on the desktop and displaying a notification (using an alert box, because notify-osd is too transient) along the lines of this.
<img src="http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/4179/screenshotwarning.png" />
Solution #2:
Use tray icon and osd instead
Written by
kreep the 17 Aug 09 at 12:59.
i think an osd is allright, and a window automatically popping up would be annoying. instead, show an icon in tray which would pop up the window when clicked (in a fashion similar to a crash alert icon).
i think an osd is allright, and a window automatically popping up would be annoying. instead, show an icon in tray which would pop up the window when clicked (in a fashion similar to a crash alert icon).
Solution #3:
Use the notification system
Written by
Akerbos the 17 Aug 09 at 19:09.
You want to notify the user of a problem? Use the notification system!
You want to notify the user of a problem? Use the notification system!
Solution #4:
Disk mounter panel applet present by default
Written by
Clorox the 21 Aug 09 at 05:39.
There is a Gnome Panel applet installed by default which shows an icon for every mounted disk, with an easy way to unmount each disk. Simply put it on the panel by default.
There is a Gnome Panel applet installed by default which shows an icon for every mounted disk, with an easy way to unmount each disk. Simply put it on the panel by default.
Solution #5:
Repair the data when the device is plugged back in
Written by
Cé the 2 Sep 09 at 17:43.
All the data is still there, it's just not (yet) on the USB drive.
Ask the user to re-insert the USB drive, and then sync the drive.
Then tell the user that the USB drive can be savely removed.
All the data is still there, it's just not (yet) on the USB drive.
Ask the user to re-insert the USB drive, and then sync the drive.
Then tell the user that the USB drive can be savely removed.
Solution #6:
Change unmount to eject
Written by
aardvark the 5 Sep 09 at 06:23.
New users coming from windows platform aren't used to the word "unmount". They are probably more familiar with the term "eject".
New users coming from windows platform aren't used to the word "unmount". They are probably more familiar with the term "eject".
Solution #7:
Mouseover on the desktop icon should indicate what you can or can not do
When a user inserts the drive it should be auto mounted and the icon on the desktop should have a "warning" flag in the corner of the icon (similar to the icon in solution #1) and when the user hovers their mouse over the icon, a popup will appear saying something along the lines of "Warning this drive is mounted. Do not unplug it."
When the drive is unmounted, it should have about a 50% transparency and a green check flag on the icon. The mouseover should say "Unmounted USB drive: Safe to remove". The transparency will differentiate between the mounted and unmounted drive.
When the drive is removed, the icon should disappear completely. If it is removed without being unmounted use solution #1
When a user inserts the drive it should be auto mounted and the icon on the desktop should have a "warning" flag in the corner of the icon (similar to the icon in solution #1) and when the user hovers their mouse over the icon, a popup will appear saying something along the lines of "Warning this drive is mounted. Do not unplug it."
When the drive is unmounted, it should have about a 50% transparency and a green check flag on the icon. The mouseover should say "Unmounted USB drive: Safe to remove". The transparency will differentiate between the mounted and unmounted drive.
When the drive is removed, the icon should disappear completely. If it is removed without being unmounted use solution #1
Solution #8:
Extends Nautilus and Save Dialog.
Written by
Lachu the 8 Nov 09 at 20:28.
Nautilus should show information, when write operation are performed. When any write operations have ended, it should show unmount button. I think about top information box, like is displayed in trash, etc.
Also, Save File Dialog could been extended too.
Nautilus should show information, when write operation are performed. When any write operations have ended, it should show unmount button. I think about top information box, like is displayed in trash, etc.
Also, Save File Dialog could been extended too.
Solution #9:
Create external journal
Written by
Lachu the 6 Feb 10 at 22:37.
Create external journal mechanism for virtual file system. After user removes storage device without unmount operation, we can asks him to put drive back and write all operations onto drive again.
Create external journal mechanism for virtual file system. After user removes storage device without unmount operation, we can asks him to put drive back and write all operations onto drive again.
Solution #1:
Add 'Edit with Program' Below 'Open with Program'
Possible Uses:
Images
o 'Open' - 'Photo Viewer'
o 'Edit' - 'Gimp'
Sound Files
o 'Open' - 'Rhythmbox'
o 'Edit' - 'Audacity'
HTML
o 'Open' - 'Firefox'
o 'Edit' - 'Bluefish'
---------------
In the 'Properties' -> 'Open With' menu you should add options to disable the Open or Edit buttons for certain files (most people read text files through a text editor so there would be no need for the 'Open' option on them). It would of course, be possible to assign an editor to the open button, but that's up to the user.
Possible Uses:
Images
o 'Open' - 'Photo Viewer'
o 'Edit' - 'Gimp'
Sound Files
o 'Open' - 'Rhythmbox'
o 'Edit' - 'Audacity'
HTML
o 'Open' - 'Firefox'
o 'Edit' - 'Bluefish'
---------------
In the 'Properties' -> 'Open With' menu you should add options to disable the Open or Edit buttons for certain files (most people read text files through a text editor so there would be no need for the 'Open' option on them). It would of course, be possible to assign an editor to the open button, but that's up to the user.
Solution #2:
Extend #1 to Include an 'Execute' Option
I find needing to chose between opening and executing a file *after* clicking it to be annoying. The context menu should have 3 options.
-Open/View
-Edit
-Execute
Of course, each option would only appear if the action were possible such as not having the execute option for a jpeg or any object without +x in the permissions.
Every file has 3 permission levels (rwx), why not have 3 ways of opening it via context-menu?
I find needing to chose between opening and executing a file *after* clicking it to be annoying. The context menu should have 3 options.
-Open/View
-Edit
-Execute
Of course, each option would only appear if the action were possible such as not having the execute option for a jpeg or any object without +x in the permissions.
Every file has 3 permission levels (rwx), why not have 3 ways of opening it via context-menu?
Solution #3:
Switch 'Open' and 'Edit' for More Descriptive Words
Possible uses:
Images
o 'View' - 'Photo Viewer'
o 'Edit' - 'Gimp'
Sound Files
o 'Play' - 'Rhythmbox'
o 'Edit' - 'Audacity'
Scripts
o 'Execute' - 'Sh'
o 'Edit' - 'Vim'
Archives
o 'Extract' - 'Archive Manager'
o 'Browse' - 'Archive Mounter'
---------------
Simply switch 'Open' and 'Edit' for more descriptive words (such as the above) if needed. Although this has no practical effect, it will certainly add to the depth of the user experience. Inspired by michele74.
Possible uses:
Images
o 'View' - 'Photo Viewer'
o 'Edit' - 'Gimp'
Sound Files
o 'Play' - 'Rhythmbox'
o 'Edit' - 'Audacity'
Scripts
o 'Execute' - 'Sh'
o 'Edit' - 'Vim'
Archives
o 'Extract' - 'Archive Manager'
o 'Browse' - 'Archive Mounter'
---------------
Simply switch 'Open' and 'Edit' for more descriptive words (such as the above) if needed. Although this has no practical effect, it will certainly add to the depth of the user experience. Inspired by michele74.
Solution #4:
Configurable 'Open With' Options
Written by
Wim the 24 Aug 09 at 15:06.
Why limit the user to predefined 'Open With' options? Allow the user to rename and add alternatives. It would probably be nice to have some reasonable defaults though (such as in
idea #3 ). For example:
Default HTML
o 'Open' - 'Firefox'
o 'Edit' - 'Bluefish'
User-Configured HTML
o 'Open' - 'Epiphany'
o 'Edit' - 'Emacs'
o '2Text' - 'html2text'
Why limit the user to predefined 'Open With' options? Allow the user to rename and add alternatives. It would probably be nice to have some reasonable defaults though (such as in idea #3). For example:
Default HTML
o 'Open' - 'Firefox'
o 'Edit' - 'Bluefish'
User-Configured HTML
o 'Open' - 'Epiphany'
o 'Edit' - 'Emacs'
o '2Text' - 'html2text'
Solution #5:
Extend #1 to no changes by default, and Allow to use Open/Edit for advanced user
Iy is great idea to have few applications to use for one type of the file. But It should be triggered by Advanced settings items. No changes by default.
Iy is great idea to have few applications to use for one type of the file. But It should be triggered by Advanced settings items. No changes by default.
Solution #9:
Define Default App Based on Last Choice
The default app for opening a file should change based on the last choice used to open the file from the context menu.
The default app for opening a file should change based on the last choice used to open the file from the context menu.
So we dont have to use encryption or mess with permissions
Written by mwillams73 the 2 Aug 09 at 23:01.
New
I really have no need for encryption, and although i have some experience with Ubuntu I feel that average users would feel more comfortable with right clicking on a file or folder and having the option in the context menu to " Add Password Lock" or something similar and then proceeds to open a dialogue box or window that you type your pass into and from that point on the file is password protected until you right click on the file again and select " Remove Password Lock" and again enter the pass. Thereby unlocking it for anyone to see.
I know that you can alter the permissions of a file or folder but many " new" users dont know how , and a search of Ubuntu forums brings up mods and posters alike suggesting encryption when all the poster really wants is to keep prying eyes out.
I honestly feel that if you dont want your girlfriend , kids or friends seeing something that may be personal or possibly offensive, that encryption is over kill and messing with permisions is unelegant. I know this does not really protect anyone from a serious threat, But I feel that its merely a road block, Used primarily for people you know or people you have logged on to your session. Thereby knowing you could walk away for a minute or two and not worry about that file or folder.
Also this could be useful for file sharing on networks . So tell me what you guys think.