<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[native adobe shockwave on linux]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/17055/</link>
    <description><![CDATA[canonical we already do not have shockwave Linux native, we can not actually open web sites that work with this plug-in without using wine, this is bad for many people, please talk to adobe or make an open source alternative.<br />For example we can not use http://www.habbo.com (Habbo is a virtual world where you can meet and make friends.) and many more games web sites!<br />
<br />


<b>[47 votes] Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #17055</b>
<br />

<br />
<br />



]]></description>

    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:37:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/17055/</guid>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from ushimitsudoki</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Wow. This is a hard one. <br /><br />On one hand, closed formats = yuck and Shockwave is pretty useless even among closed formats. <br /><br />But, I like the idea of Adobe reaching out more for Linux like they have been lately. Imagine how crazy awesome a native version of the big Adobe applications like Photoshop would be.<br /><br />So, I have to go +1 for the long-term dream of getting Adobe to consider Linux as a viable platform.<br /><br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from wleoncio</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I'm not sure, but I remember having read somewhere on the internet a long time ago that Adobe had stopped working on Shockwave.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from pepperpupper</title>
  <description><![CDATA[+1. I think that _any_ application is a good thing to have support for, so that poeple have the freedom to choose what to use.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from stoffel</title>
  <description><![CDATA[-1: I think we should focus our resources on getting Adobe to support Photoshop on Linux.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Eldmannen</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I have seriously not come across any site that uses Shockwave in several years. Possibly a decade.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from wleoncio</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Eldmannen, the only example I could find of a site using shockwave is Miniclip.com.  Some of their games use shockwave instead of Flash.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from edm1</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Adobe putting time into making a linux shockwave would take their focus off improving native flash and air which are much more desirable apps/environments for many more people.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Rabbid</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Isn't Shockwave kind off dead? I only see a couple of games using it a year.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
      </channel>
</rss>
