Written by arkara the 22 Aug 08 at 14:39.
Related project: Update manager.
Status: New
Rationale
Sometimes after an ubuntu release, there are some software releases, that are bug-fixing.
For example gimp-2.4.7 is a bugfix release that is not on ubuntu repositories.
There are also openoffice releases, that are bugfixing but are implemented only after an ubuntu release.
I believe that ubuntu should update it packages, after a software bugfix release has been made in order to improve it's stability.
I don't know if it's possible "logistics" wise, but I'd prefer the packages to be updated regardless whether the changes are bug fixes or new features... anyway +1
cheesehead(Brainstorm moderator)
wrote on the 22 Aug 08 at 17:06
What's the compelling reason for changing the current system of stable versions and the option of backports?
Would this mean a split of Backports?
Real-Backports
Just-Bug-Fix-Backports
What if the bug does not affect stability, but only corrects a typo or other non-critical bug? Should the package be specially updated? It's still a bug fix....
This.....fucking.....has NOTHING to do with brainstorming about Ubuntu. Augh, thank God the next Brainstorm update will prevent retards like the OP of this idea from ever setting foot on Brainstorm again.
If you want a package update, file a report on Launchpad explaining why that release should be pushed in to a stable release. You should explain that it only fixes bugs, or rather, it fixes an important bug that many users hate and must get into hardy-updates. Etc.