Ubuntu QA:
BlogBrainstormPackage status
Log in
Ubuntu QA
The Ubuntu community has contributed 22823 ideas, 138726 comments, 2639112 votes
Idea sandbox Idea sandbox
Popular ideas Popular ideas
Ideas in development Ideas in development
Implemented ideas Implemented ideas
Idea #23899: Move the min, max, close buttons back to the right in 10.04

bug This idea was marked as being not considered for implementation the 7 July 11.
Written by readmanr the 6 Mar 10 at 21:00. Related project: Gnome. Status: Won't implement
Rationale
In Ubuntu Lucid 10.04 Alpha3 we have a new default theme, however the Minimise, Maximise and Close buttons have been moved from the top right, to the top left.
(see the image at the bottom)

This was a poor choice for the following reasons...

- If clicking at the top menu (File , View, Help etc) the close buttons are VERY Close, accidents can happen.
- There used to be a tiny dot in the top left, which had in its menu, Min, Max, Move, Always on Top, and Close (So why move the Min, Max, Close buttons to the left?
- Migrating Windows and Mac users will be used to having them at the right, which is a huge usability jump)

Changes like this should be an optional choice, while it is possible to manually edit the theme, it should not be the default for an LTS release.

Ubuntu 10.04 Alpha3
src: http://blog.daviey.com/blogroll/anything-but-the-buttons.html


1192
votes
closed
Solution #1: Move the Min, Max, Close buttons back to the Right for the 10.04 Release.
Written by readmanr the 6 Mar 10 at 21:00.
Move the buttons back over to the top right for the final Ubuntu 10.04 release.
-449
votes
closed
Solution #3: Mirror for the left
Written by Akerbos the 6 Mar 10 at 21:38.
I think it is most intuitive if the buttons are ordered the same in relation to the window center ("To close, click the outermost button"), so

Right: min-max-close

relates to

Left: close-max-min
-1049
votes
closed
Solution #4: Why not have them on both sides?
Written by jeffd1830 the 7 Mar 10 at 08:56.
I think having the buttons on both sides would also be a viable option. I understand that this would detract visually from the simplicity, but maybe if the buttons were subdued until the mouse hovers over the bar?

(I feel less than confident about this solution, but thought it needed mentioning.)
647
votes
closed
Solution #5: let's user choose,
Written by Long Lazuli the 7 Mar 10 at 11:34.
In xubuntu, user cas can choose where are the button on the titlebar.
-521
votes
closed
Solution #6: Drag & Drop
Written by la_serpe the 7 Mar 10 at 16:29.
It can be movable so the user could change it intuitively
515
votes
closed
Solution #7: By default have it in right,but include option in theme, customize, to drag&Drop
Written by Vlad_Alfredov the 8 Mar 10 at 11:13.
Well the title pretty much says it...Default is to have it on right, but to include an option in "Change Desktop Background" >> Theme >> Customize, to move the buttons to a user defined position.
-121
votes
closed
Solution #8: make the default alignment theme-dependent
Written by marvo the 10 Mar 10 at 10:28.
There are some themes that look better when the buttons are placed on the left side (like Ambiance, Radiance and Gorilla) and there are some themes that look better with the buttons being on the right side (like Glider, Human, Clearlooks or SphereCrystal).

So i propose to set the default alignment depending on the chosen theme and make it easily switchable.

The current way to change the alignment of the buttons back to the right by typing
gconftool-2 --type string --set /apps/metacity/general/button_layout "menu:minimize,maximize,close"
is a bit tedious.
-221
votes
closed
Solution #9: Put Close button in the corner
Written by Lex the 10 Mar 10 at 11:04.
Put Close button in the corner - depending on chosen solution will be left or right corner or window.
-386
votes
closed
Solution #11: Put close on right, min/max on left
Written by euxneks the 11 Mar 10 at 01:31.
I think that Minimize and Maximize are more similar to the menu anyway, so put them on the left, and put the close button on the right, this harkens back to the days of old Unix and I think would still allow the theme to stand out.
-157
votes
closed
Solution #13: More Windows-like behaviour
Written by i386dx the 14 Mar 10 at 12:50.
Move the Min, Max and Close-buttons back to the right.

Be able to close a window by double-clicking the window-icon at the left. This is much faster than clicking the icon and selecting 'Close' in the menu.
-143
votes
closed
Solution #14: Keep default left Minimize, Maximise/Resize & Close Buttons
Written by MoebusNet the 15 Mar 10 at 01:04.
Rationale: In VirtualBox without Guest Additions, the right-hand side of the desktop and the lower part of the desktop are not visible until you scroll. Having the above-mentioned buttons on the top-left side of the window by default makes them accessible when (not if) Guest Additions do not work/are unavailable or when scrolling for whatever reason does not work. This is especially true for development versions.

I _am_ in favor of choice, so this should be fairly easy for a user to change (preferably by GUI) to right, left or both.

Just my opinion.
-44
votes
closed
Solution #16: Leave the buttons on the right until 10.10
Written by neblogas the 16 Mar 10 at 15:58.
Because Mark said that in 10.10 the windows will have something new in the right side, but now, there is no need to change the buttons, and this is LTS release! in 10.10 when you will finish the new mysteriuos window features on the right then you can put the buttons on the left. As I said, there is no need now to change. Its an LTS release and the people and companies won't change until the next LTS, so there won't be for them new mysteriuos windows features on the right!
246
votes
closed
Solution #17: Place a checkbox in the Appearance menu: Left / Right
Written by TrueSongMedia the 16 Mar 10 at 17:16.
Yes the button location can be changed via Terminal, but for the average user...the Terminal can be a bit scary. I think it would be appropriate to place a simple option in the Appearance Preferences window.

Something like this:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40647960/window_controls_position_gui.png
-117
votes
closed
Solution #18: Top Horizontial Bar moved the the Left or Right as Vertical Bar
Written by ichido the 17 Mar 10 at 17:53.
Move the Top Bar to the Right Side-Vertical Bar and the Bottom Bar would be on the Left Side Vertical.
This would allow for more Vertical Space.
The user would be able to Swap the Left Bar with the Right Bar and also the Size/Thickness of the Bars.
Applications could maintain the Top Bar or a Side or a Bottom bar for their Window.
-94
votes
closed
Solution #19: Replace the menubar with an icon
Written by Wiplash4 the 19 Mar 10 at 12:17.
Hello
I would like to add one idea: Replace the menubar (File, Edit, View, etc.), which can be found in every window, with an icon and put that icon into the titlebar. It worked out for my terminal.
Regards
-88
votes
closed
Solution #23: Merge Statusbar into titlebar
Written by Wiplash4 the 19 Mar 10 at 16:40.
I figured out that the status bar is only filled up to 1 / 4. Why not put those messages displayed in the status bar in the title bar?
-85
votes
closed
Solution #24: Modify all applications consistently
Written by a_pirard the 20 Mar 10 at 03:14.
Modify all applications to be consistent with Lucid : move all close buttons to the left, for example, OpenOffice document close, Firefox tab close, File Explorer side pane close, etc... etc...

-134
votes
closed
Solution #26: Instead of corner, make it POSSIBLE to place buttons in the MIDDLE.
Written by luojie-dune the 20 Mar 10 at 21:01.
Instead of corner, make it POSSIBLE to place buttons in the MIDDLE.

I knew there is no such a solution according to "ewmh".

But, I guess most people have their cursor in the middle of a window for most of the time they using it.
35
votes
closed
Solution #27: For longer term, how about a window manager merge?
Written by LukeM33P the 25 Mar 10 at 01:13.
Compiz managers and decorators are already effective at options. Placing the Metacity and Kwin options in Emerald Decorator manager, which would be preinstalled, along with CCSM (or a custom replacement) would be the solution, with CCSM/replacement simplified to look like (in functionality and basic organization) the KDE settings manager, but using default schemes and such, of course.

For KDE users, alongside the CCSM/replacement, the interface would be integrated into the System Settings, just like the traditional settings.

The reason I propose this is because options, while not easy to find and configure (and why I propose the reorg) are very powerful. Setting up Metacity and KWin to show up as options and adding the appropriate settings, if necessary, seems to make sense (to me) as a long-term solution. The operating system needs to seem as encompassing as KDE or even more so, and combining these options so that the system is even more universal would be a step towards this.

An addition to the application of managing the system title bar like the KDE or GNOME dashboards would be similarly useful, and may be all of this potential solution that should be used. Default should stay in line with last-gen human theme, even if the colors and buttons look different.
51
votes
closed
Solution #28: adopt the XFCE placement approach in Gnome appearence prefs
Written by 2cute4u the 25 Mar 10 at 03:37.
XFCE has for many years had a very easy convient way to configure the placment of titlebar buttons. See.http://www.xfce.org/documentation/4.2/manuals/xfwm4#wm-settings
It would not be too difficult to add somethng like this to gnome; that way everyone can be happy.
-93
votes
closed
Solution #29: Have the buttons on both sides AND hide them.
Written by MisterLinOx the 26 Mar 10 at 21:52.
Have the min, max, close buttons on both sides of the title bar, but hide them. The only time they should show is on mouseover of the bar, but depending on which side you mouseover decides which side the buttons show.

For example, cursor closer to the left side? Mouse over the top-left and the buttons will appear. Vice-versa for the right side.
-63
votes
closed
Solution #30: choice where in the Instalation
Written by emucosmos the 27 Mar 10 at 03:11.
make apear a messagebox in the begining of the instalation asking where do we want to have those buttons, coz personally I love the new mac style, but considering the ubuntu objectives, it's a good option to let the users choice.
-44
votes
closed
Solution #34: Let user chose on the First Run, after installation.
Written by darkham the 29 Mar 10 at 08:23.
Let user chose on the First Run, after installation.
-57
votes
closed
Solution #35: Press [middle-mouse-button] whilst the cursor is over the window border
Written by tomjb24 the 3 Apr 10 at 09:25.
Hover over the window border, click the middle mouse button, scroll to choose (close, minimise, maximise)
-59
votes
closed
Solution #36: Create Another Ubuntu. Call it "UbuntuRewind"
Written by rrnwexec the 3 Apr 10 at 20:26.
Create a version of Ubuntu for those who like the (standard) Ubuntu desktop's "look and feel" just the way it is. Solicit Mark's (SABDFL) endorsement.

Enjoy how growingly quaint it feels as time passes by!
-38
votes
closed
Solution #37: Make Mac Styled menu bar
Written by jase21 the 4 Apr 10 at 11:54.
Make Mac styled menu bar which is available in KDE. The current active windows menu appears on the bar. So no accidental closing of windows.

Or move the window control buttons to the right.
-12
votes
closed
Solution #38: Allow the option to be changed in installation slideshow and in minimal install
Written by Jon Monreal the 17 Apr 10 at 23:49.
Please note that this is not an idea for the imminent release of 10.04, but would be better included in the next update ISO.

Experienced users already know how to change the buttons back to the original location, so server installations shouldn't be so much of a problem.

For absolute beginner users, the first slide in the installation slideshow could be one explaining the benefits of having the buttons on the left side and asking the user to choose what they could like to do.

In the minimal install, it would also be easy to add a simple option (most users using the minimal install are probably fairly experienced).

This would solve the real issue here: beginners possibly not using Ubuntu at all because it changes something.
-6
votes
closed
Solution #39: found an easy fix
Written by land_grab the 5 May 10 at 23:23.
I found this extremely easy fix how to move the min, max, and close buttons back to the right side.


http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/13535/move-window-buttons-back-to-the-right-in-u buntu-10.04/

Even I was able to follow these directions and make it happen!
-4
votes
closed
Solution #40: To the right by default, but an option to move them to the left.
Written by turbolad the 5 Jul 10 at 15:42.
As per title. Buttons to the right by default, with an option to move to the left.

Don't forget to keep the little circle, which when clicked on, has options such as "Always On Top", "Move to Workspace Right" etc. These options should never be removed and I think the 3 buttons should be on the right by default, as most newbies are familiar with that setup.
-11
votes
closed
Solution #41: Put min, max, close buttons in a completely new position
Written by baretobareto the 3 Aug 10 at 20:31.


Fisrt of all, sorry for my English.

Why we really needs buttons to the right? Well theres no real difference between having your buttons on the left or on the right, its just a matter of have the enough time to get used to one position or another.
But what about if we have these button in a complete new position.
What about having min, max, close buttons on the right BUT in the lower side of the windows instead of the upper side.

If you think about it, when you open a document or a web-page, you need to scroll down to really knows if that document is what you are looking for. When a document is too long, you need to use the scroll down arrow. So your mouse-arrow will be closer to the lower right of the window instead of the upper side of the window.
If you want to look to a minimize window that you think it would be not useful anymore, you need to un-minimize this window. If the buttons are in the lower right of the window it will be needed much less movement of your hand to close it after un-minimize because the close button will be closer to the task bar.

As you see there are some reason to have buttons in the lower side of the window BUT I know there are others to have this buttons on others positions.

So, why not to put this buttons in a completely new position.
This could be a ubuntu-only-feature just like the recycle bin in the task bar is a ubuntu-only-feature.

Propose your solution

Attachments


Duplicates


Comments
andrew (Brainstorm moderator) wrote on the 6 Mar 10 at 21:05
While not a solution for this Idea, here is a recent writeup on how to change it: http://blog.daviey.com/blogroll/anything-but-the-buttons.html

rakudave wrote on the 6 Mar 10 at 21:35
I'm only gonna say this once, so listen closely:
Ubuntu is NOT Mac OS X, and that's exactly why I use Ubuntu. So stop trying to copy-paste from OSX!

Akerbos wrote on the 6 Mar 10 at 21:42
Exactly. Whoever had that dumb idea? Only members of the Mac cult argue that having those buttons on the left and they fail to do so convincingly.

In fact, the first bullet in the rationale makes a very good point: While on MacOS there is nothing either on the left or the right next to those buttons, on Ubuntu we typically have the window's menu on the left hand side. Separating the two blocks seems wise to me.

Besides, usability is 90% habit, but don't get me started on this.

readmanr wrote on the 6 Mar 10 at 23:11
People should try it before using gdonf to fix it, but for me, where I have to use Windows within the workplace, it just doesn't work.

Should the Order be the same as the right? Min, Max, Close? or mirror?... Close, Max, Min.
I think Ubuntu just fixed something that wasn't even broke.

ratdude747 wrote on the 7 Mar 10 at 02:15
yeah. this sucks. whoever was in charge of this call gets an epic fail in my opinion. WHY did you change it? WHY???

ratdude747 wrote on the 7 Mar 10 at 02:20
oh, andrew, thanks for the link.

Auzy wrote on the 7 Mar 10 at 03:19
Actually, OSX people wouldn't bother arguing about where the buttons should be.

But its quite clear it wasn't thought through. Moving the close button closer to the middle of the application is a bad idea, because it means its more likely you pass it for minimisation/maximisation too. From my unprocessional/incompetent GUI design perspective, its just bad. Maybe not as bad if the button order is switched, but moving the buttons for the sake of doing so is just stupid.

Linux needs to stop trying to be different for the sake of being so. There are some good reasons why neither OSX or Windows use this order!!

McIvor wrote on the 7 Mar 10 at 04:36
I actually read a good explanation for this change - something about how most of what you do is on the left side of the screen anyway. This being said, I still don't like the change at all. I usually try to keep an open mind regarding different interfaces, but it's just so traditional having them on the right. Besides, its impossible to use with Gnome-Shell because there's a hotcorner on the top left.

ratdude747 wrote on the 7 Mar 10 at 06:24
good point! even though i do not use gnome-shell, i bet there are plenty that do.

dreamr wrote on the 7 Mar 10 at 08:12
Well, there are people who have hot corners in the right side of the screen too (I have enabled them in each corner using Compiz), so it's just something that you usually need to get accustomed to.

As a bit unrelated solution proposal: would it be possible to have both? I mean: make the minimize-maximize-close icons be invisible in normal use, only to become visible when mouse is hovered on top of the title bar. Then the buttons could appear in which ever corner is closer to the mouse. This would seem more elegant and fresh solution, if there is need to do something different, instead of just swapping the side altogether.

But I guess this goes beyond simple positioning... more a theme/effect than part of solid windowing system. It would be pretty cool effect though.

Cybolic wrote on the 8 Mar 10 at 00:18
If we really want buttons in a different arrangement that Windows I think copying AmigaOS would be a better option: Separate destructive buttons (close) from non-destructive ones (menu, minimise, maximise), so "close:menu,minimise,maximise" or "maximise,minimise:close" (to write in a gconf key fashion) would be my suggestion.

nloewen wrote on the 8 Mar 10 at 04:57
I think its a nice change. although I am wondering where the dot went. right click works, but visually I think the left side looks a bit heavy now with the window title there as well. maybe the title should be put on the right for balance.

lightcs4d wrote on the 8 Mar 10 at 14:14
Biggest reason I don't use any Mac look-alike themes is because I can't stand having the buttons on the left. Upon installation, it will be the first thing I will look to change if not moved back before the final release.

omerbarlas wrote on the 9 Mar 10 at 07:48
Look at it like this; your end call button on your cell phone is on the right -close button-, to start a call you push the button on the left -the start menu-. Almost all the world writes from left to right, so this is the natural order. I don't understand why it is on the left, it really should be placed on the right -right- side.

Limitlesschannels wrote on the 9 Mar 10 at 20:39
quickly change it back to previous position and order:

~ launch gconf-editor
alt + f2, type gconf-editor
~ go to apps/metacity/general
~ set "button layout" to "menu:minimize,maximize,close"

I agree, this is ridiculous, but no solution covers both to restore original settings so I had to up-vote on two.

chauncellor wrote on the 10 Mar 10 at 01:58
What a horribly thought out idea this was. Completely spontaneous, with no actual backup bogus. The mailing list has failed to come up with an adequate response to this nonsense.

Ay, yi, yi, will you people stop doing stupid things like this and work on more important items? Is Notify-OSD in the way of the close buttons? Then why don't you actually allow us to position it so that we fix 80 percent of what people don't like about the notification system?

AFarris01 wrote on the 10 Mar 10 at 08:07
I agree with everything chauncellor just said above.

I very seriously hope that they put the buttons back to their original locations (this includes the little menu dot).

I'm off to go find other places to complain about this :p

readmanr wrote on the 10 Mar 10 at 15:20
Isn't Solution10 the same as Solution1?

readmanr wrote on the 10 Mar 10 at 18:21
At Solution9, and Solution3, if the close button is in the left hand corner, if you slip slightly when trying to click on the Applications menu, or the File Menu you can easily close the application you are in, which is why having the min max close buttons on the Left is just idiotic.

Akerbos wrote on the 10 Mar 10 at 19:04
In #3, I do _not_ argue for putting the buttons in the left corner. I say, _if_ you have to put them there, at least order them like stated there.

mrkazoodle wrote on the 10 Mar 10 at 19:21
I agree with Raveduke and many others:

This is Linux, we don't want mac. Don't copy mac features for no reason, show some self respect.
If it were useful I'd say go ahead, but this is useless copying.

If all we wanted were macs, why bother? Whoever came up with this idea: quit and go get yourself a mac.

Auzy wrote on the 10 Mar 10 at 19:47
Just because Apple does something doesn't mean everyone else is copying.. However, I am interested to hear WHY this is being done, if there is a good reason. McIvor's explanation was missing a few pieces :(

Amigotux wrote on the 10 Mar 10 at 20:02
I like the buttons on the left side.
First i thought... shit... i don´t like mac !!!

But i worked some days with it... and now i like it.
The distance to move the mouse is really more less.

panel - menu - buttons

I hate the new purple wallpaper... but the buttons i like now :-)

In my case... i wish the old order only: Min, Max, Close
(sorry for my bad english)


Amigotux

readmanr wrote on the 10 Mar 10 at 21:57
Light is a mac clone...
http://digitizor.com/2010/03/06/is-ubuntu-having-an-identity-crisis/

tsm1248 wrote on the 11 Mar 10 at 04:47
The fact is it is more convenient because the buttons st6art from that side. However im use to using the buttons on the right.

Pros:
Way more accessible on the left side
Quicker
Buttons start from left also, therefore making it easier/quicker for the user to move through the desktop

Con:
Users from windows to ubuntu may find it almost taboo...why simple they have always had their on the right

solution:
Make it a preference, by default use the left and have right as an option.

This would be the smart thing to do, this way it satisfies both parties and makes everybody happy.

Please no one bring up some garbage along the lines of ....this is not osx.... stop and think why it is on the left side (more convenient obviously).

I say we go modern leave it on the left as default and give the user an option to switch them around and even organize them.

tsm1248 wrote on the 11 Mar 10 at 05:42
2 things to keep in mind also
Gnome-osk like
kde-windows like

still though their should be an option but keep the windows to the left =)

WarKirby wrote on the 11 Mar 10 at 13:18
This is a silly change for the sake of change, it serves no purpose. Don't fix what isn't broken.

Just flat out revert this.

rafael.gattringer wrote on the 11 Mar 10 at 18:21
The change in this form was a bad idea.

* (Post) Alpha 3 for this big change is really late.

* "New and fresh" is not always better. (e.g. see the new usplash design)

* There is a long tradition for placing the buttons on the right hand side and it worked fine.

* At least the close button should be on the right side. This makes sense when reading from the left to the right.

Leave it on the right side by default but provide an option to place it on the left.



TrueSongMedia wrote on the 12 Mar 10 at 10:05
I like that the Ubuntu team is trying new things, but this is a bad move for a default change. Those of us who have been using Ubuntu / Linux for years are used to the wm buttons on the right, not the left.

If the user wishes to place these buttons on the left, give him that option - but don't make it the default.

And, as someone else said, the buttons on the left are far too close to the File | Edit | (etc) menus and could be accidentally clicked.

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 12 Mar 10 at 10:09
As Akerbos said:

"Exactly. Whoever had that dumb idea? Only members of the Mac cult argue that having those buttons on the left and they fail to do so convincingly."

I use Macs quite a bit and even *I* say this change was foolish.

Ubuntu is Ubuntu! And that's why I love it! I don't want Ubuntu to change into Mac OS X - in any way!

Leave the buttons on the right or let the users choose.

readmanr wrote on the 12 Mar 10 at 12:28
A really good read with a huge list of things regarding the menus on the left...
http://yokozar.org/blog/archives/194

biophysics wrote on the 12 Mar 10 at 12:50
Ubuntu is Ubuntu! And that's why I love it! I don't want Ubuntu to change into Mac OS X - in any way!

Leave the buttons on the right or let the users choose.

rafael.gattringer wrote on the 12 Mar 10 at 14:52
Launchpad: [Lucid] Window controls are on the left side after update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/533566

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 12 Mar 10 at 18:03
I think we all need to mark the bug rafael.gattringer posted as affecting us as well.

Let's tell the Ubuntu team how much we dislike the change!

kermiac wrote on the 13 Mar 10 at 00:31
Please keep the discussion here or in the forums & not on the bug reports. In saying that however, if you dislike the change - please mark the bug (or the master bug report - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/532633 ) as affecting you too.
Thanks in advance!

alanpater wrote on the 13 Mar 10 at 07:27
Why was this change made?

Change for change sake or for Canonical Branding are not my cup of tea.


mehrmor wrote on the 13 Mar 10 at 08:53
Yeah I agree with those who are for user preference.But the default should be on the left-side, so this is a welcome change in my opinion.

The only downside to this I think is that it will be adjacent to the menu bar and thus the odds of mis-clicks could increase.

One solution would be to move the menu bar to the center, but then some users might begin to complain this is a bit odd.
I find this approach good for myself, so maybe this should also be customisable?

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 13 Mar 10 at 18:41
Users are used to having the buttons on the right. Every other distro has them on the right. The standard is on the right. Therefore the default should be on the right.

tsm1248 wrote on the 13 Mar 10 at 18:51
TrueSOngMEdia---wrong windows has it on the right mac has it on the left "Every other distro has them on the right"-wrong.

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 13 Mar 10 at 18:53
tsm1248, I'm a Mac user. Distro means LINUX. :P

So you are wrong. Every LINUX DISTRO has it on the right.

ratdude747 wrote on the 13 Mar 10 at 19:16
until they fix the mac-clone issue, im switching to kubuntu.

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 13 Mar 10 at 19:31
Downloading Kubuntu now ^_^

ratdude747 wrote on the 13 Mar 10 at 20:00
never mind... kubuntu almost made me puke...

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 14 Mar 10 at 01:55
For now, here's how to change the buttons back to where they should be:

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=8963084#post8963084

dreamingdarkness wrote on the 14 Mar 10 at 01:59
First time I've posted on brainstorm, just chiming in to add to the general melee:
I prefer top right.
I want my close/minimize/maximize separated from my (already) cluttered top left corner panel.
While screen real-estate can be a concern, and 'speed' (top-left clustered menu easier to access) is somewhat valid, I want the MOST destructive action (closing, without an undo option, possibly losing work in some programs if save prompting is not implemented) as far as possible from a mis-click.
I can minimize, close, and etc by right-click on the icon in the tray as well, but leave it at the top right. Please revert change!

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 14 Mar 10 at 01:59
Posted as its own thread here:

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1429254

fd1k5 wrote on the 14 Mar 10 at 02:29
while looking for a newbie-solution to let my syncmaster 913n monitor in 9.10 show its native resolution instead of this win98 visually-impaired-ready look without any wallpaper i got back on opera and what i like about it: smart ideas, useful and pragmatic design + accessibility. resource and user friendly. that's why i changed from win to ubuntu.

if you have programming time and heart to spend on this idea, why not create a system wide panel (on the right), which is, as known in psychology, the standard western visual direction you take new ideas from, and place overall buttons to manage active applications.

- btw: is there any Japanese or Arabian opinion on this left-to-right-topic?

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 14 Mar 10 at 04:26
fd1k5, considering how late we are in the development cycle, that's not likely to be something to be included in 10.04. Furthermore, it's not really relevant to this brainstorm idea.

I suggest starting your own idea.

fd1k5 wrote on the 14 Mar 10 at 13:05
*TrueSongMedia, thank you for the hint. i did not mean to offend you/the developing process. that night i was annoyed by the looks of my screen, neither finding an easy solution online nor keeping in mind whats going on in the background to make ubuntu/an OS/things work. now i re-appreciate the meaning of usability and joy in little things on every day life with f.e. a pc.*

Furthermore, it's not really relevant to this brainstorm idea.

assuming you refer to idea 1 (left or right side): you are right. solution#1 made it as seen.

having read the thread as a win-user i'd choose it, too: make the usual style (right side) default for convenience, established programming and new users; add the lift-side style as an option for people wanting to try out the other way around and use resources e.g. for touch screen/virtual keyboard solutions, which are more human-related. (again, the question of keeping habits or developing..) this idea might be relevant for further development considering the claim to be new + useful, if necessary or still wanted.

# for my ego: i use use dvorak-keyboard-layout and left-or-right-hand--depending-on-circumstances--use of the pc mouse and never thought about where to put buttons before i read this thread. thanks again for the insights, and i am not ironical.

I suggest starting your own idea.

where do i put other funny ideas like 'please put DEL and RENAME option in the context menu far from each other'? or 'what the f#?.' does this log-text mean? opening up a new thread? yes?

i am a typical lala-win-user lacking the 'first-try-out-yourself-than-ask-others-implement-and-share' style, since the idea of bringing in myself is quite new and therefore have to ask. but i would be happy to provide with noob suggestions.

# too much text for brainstorming, i know.

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 14 Mar 10 at 16:38
@fd1k5,

No offense was taken. :)

I know you're just trying to be helpful.

But seriously, why not submit that as a new idea (http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/submit/) and see where it goes? That's what makes Ubuntu cool.

If enough people like it, it could be implemented in the next release :)

fd1k5 wrote on the 14 Mar 10 at 20:43
@TrueSongMedia : thank you.


ilya@eeepc wrote on the 15 Mar 10 at 06:22
Left is better!!!!11

ilya@eeepc wrote on the 15 Mar 10 at 06:25
but close should be at the corner, because it's easier to aim

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 16 Mar 10 at 14:35
ilya@eeepc,

for you perhaps. The majority would disagree with you. This is why we need to have an option.

StasikOS wrote on the 16 Mar 10 at 18:59
The only one thing i can't understand: Why [min] [max] [close] where [Close] [Maximize] [Minimize] looks more useful?

XrayA4T wrote on the 17 Mar 10 at 07:52
Yes it takes a bit of getting used to but after a few days I am getting the hang of it.

I like the new look (using Ambiance) and I even like the purple (shock...horror)

Ubuntu needs to have its own identity, not windows and not mac. Mac has always had a better design sense (IMHO) so I think that is why many designers follow that.

I think that a LTS is the right time for the change as that is going to be with us for 2 years+

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 17 Mar 10 at 19:22
XrayA4T, but if the majority of users dislike the change, it is foolish to leave it as the default.

Yes there are users who like the buttons on the left. For those users, there should be an option. But the default needs to be the right side with 9.x button order.

cousteau wrote on the 18 Mar 10 at 21:21
IMO, each theme should have its own button and title position (solution #8), as it has its own decoration style, colors, controls, mouse, icons... but it should be possible to customize it, as it is with the other elements (you can get the decoration of one theme and the icons of another in a custom theme, for example, so let's do the same with button position)

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 19 Mar 10 at 00:57
I like that idea, cousteau.

a_pirard wrote on the 20 Mar 10 at 03:33
In my opinion, those buttons will move back to the right in an extra beta release dated April 1st :-)

warparty wrote on the 20 Mar 10 at 21:40
Now I understand that most market driven interactive products go through a series of checks and balances before "perfection" is reached. And no one designer can be blamed or have absolute control. BUT WTF. Common Sense tells us not to stare at the sun, AND NOT TO PUT THE EXIT BUTTON NEXT TO THE EDIT MENU.

Ubuntu team, you know me , I love you guys. Just don't mess with my default interface and color contrast, that's all.

albyrock87 wrote on the 20 Mar 10 at 22:38
I think a big change is necessary if this leads to big improvements.

But no improvements has made to balance this change.

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 21 Mar 10 at 11:37
I'm sorry, but I have to laugh at idea #25.

"Request Microsoft Windows to move close buttons to the left to avoid the confusion of users migrating to Ubuntu"

I hope this is a joke. Do you really think Microsoft would consider this for more than 0.00001 microseconds?

This is Ubuntu's problem - and therefore Ubuntu's problem to fix.

warpslide wrote on the 21 Mar 10 at 21:45
Put it back the way it was! I just updated from 9.10 to 10.04 Beta and was floored. Thank you for those posting how to put it back.

ratdude747 wrote on the 22 Mar 10 at 14:27
M$ would NEVER consider that idea #25!

Does anybody know WHY they moved it in the first place?

Auzy wrote on the 22 Mar 10 at 15:37
I agree with Ratdude.. MS definitely wont.

rasband wrote on the 22 Mar 10 at 16:47
They are moving them to get users used to them on the left for the next release because they want to put something on the right (what I read didn't say what)... I forget where I read that - sorry I can't link!

My vote would be if the release keeps the buttons on the left, at least fix the order. It should be the same as the right but flipped (aka - minimize,maximize,close rather than max,min,close).

But at least its Ubuntu and I can change it myself :)

I guess this post is more about for people new/switching since most of us know how to change it to whatever we like.

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 22 Mar 10 at 19:36
rasband,

I wouldn't mind it as much if the buttons were in the Mac OS X order (x)(-)(+) but that's because I use a Mac.

That said, this is NOT ok for users coming from Windows.

Overall, this is an unwelcome change.

Why can they not put that "something" on the LEFT and leave our buttons alone?


ratdude747 wrote on the 23 Mar 10 at 02:45
i agree... why not put the "new feature" on the left? leaving the right blank and unused looks bad... and it is a LTS release! i think the the radical changes should be left for non-lts releases... so they have time to be improved and accepted.

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 23 Mar 10 at 10:05
Bingo, ratdude747

badgaz wrote on the 23 Mar 10 at 12:28
I was going to install Lucid Beta 1 on my friends PC then I remembered they had moved the the buttons to the left and I know they will complain and resist the change and I just can't be bothered to deal with that.

Greyed wrote on the 23 Mar 10 at 13:25
It is rare that I will say a change is stupid. I may not agree with a change but as long as I can understand why it happened I can deal with it.

Not in this case.

This is stupid.

I'm getting sick and tired of FOSS developers treating the users as scum to be ignored. First it was Firefox several times over with changes to Tab behavior and the address bar behavior with absolutely no way to reverse it. Then it was Chrome with overloading the tab close behavior with no chance to make it sane. Now it's Ubuntu, the Linux for desktop users, making a change which is only reversible by command line. Hello, COMMAND LINE!?

That is what makes it stupid.

NO, telling your users that "You'll get used to it" is NOT acceptable.

NO, putting forth a desktop user friendly distro with a massive change to usability configurable only via command line is NOT acceptable.

It is just stupid.

huygens_25 wrote on the 23 Mar 10 at 22:52
One remark:
This is just 3 little buttons standing on a row

:-)

And a fact: Ubuntu is just another Operating System.
Which implies: it does not have to look like MacOS, nor does it have to look like Windows.
An idea: let's find Ubuntu's own way about design, and this can be different than other contenders.

Side note: As a heavy trackpad/trackpoint user, I find it less cumbersome to have the close button (at least) on the left, it happen to be more often near my mouse than when it is on the right. The reason is probably that my mother tongue and the English language are left-to-right oriented.

Another idea: If that last statement is true, then it would probably better to have somewhere in Appearance the opportunity to change the buttons position, so that right-to-left oriented language such as arabic can have also the choice.

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 23 Mar 10 at 23:20
huygens_25, those "three little buttons standing in a row" affect how the user interacts with the window.

And, as a heavy trackpad user, I find it less cumbersome to have the buttons on the *right*.

This change is foolish.

Mark Shuttleworth, you should be ashamed of this.

Just sayin'....

feigr wrote on the 24 Mar 10 at 02:13
Debian 6, here we come!

Or maybe not, but at least change them back to the right until your big new secret fancy justification comes out in October.

Serji wrote on the 25 Mar 10 at 10:49
It is necessary to place the buttons in both the corners and make the auto hide buttons, those who are used to close the window on the left side will automatically look for them there, those who are on the right - on the right, you need to satisfy two desires.

Serji wrote on the 25 Mar 10 at 10:54
And even better, if buttons are coming anywhere when you hover the mouse on the title bar window

TrueSongMedia wrote on the 25 Mar 10 at 21:40
Serji,

That wouldn't work for most users. Many users use the title bar to move a window.

a_pirard wrote on the 26 Mar 10 at 14:43
Yes, of course, Solutions 24 and 25 were my jokes.
But to raise the feeling of a very serious topic.
I feel like filing this bug:

Windows closing buttons on the left detrimental to Ubuntu

Ubuntu 10.04 beta puts closing buttons to the left.
I keep reaching to the right and I just can't get accustomed.
It's inconsistent with ALL other closing buttons, including Ubuntu's itself.
People alternating Windows and Ubuntu would get mad.
They would have to quit one. Guess which.
Or to choose another system making every effort to look like Windows the most.
Like Mint, maybe.
Yes, if Ubuntu gets unwise they may be considering Mint.
Remember some people have basic skills and are very sensitive to such facts.

a_pirard wrote on the 27 Mar 10 at 12:46
Regarding solution 13, I wonder why people vote against feature requests others do appreciate if the only impact on their live is not to use the feature they don't like.
Personally, I appreciate being able to occasionally double click the Window bar icon when that's faster to close the window tat way but I'll never disparage "Always on Top" because I don't use it.
I'd feel great that Windows' immigrants would keep their habits.

badgaz wrote on the 27 Mar 10 at 17:12
One of the problems open source operating systems can face when standing up against OSX and Windows is the included applications are designed by different people with different goals and can fragment the interface, different applications put things in different places whilst Apple and Microsoft have more control to make things more uniform.

It isn't an overwhelming issue but this decision seems to make the matter worse by putting the close button on the opposite side to pretty much all other applications for example closing a tab on Firefox and I really hope they revert back to the right as it's backwards thinking.

Samuel wrote on the 28 Mar 10 at 06:02
It is stupid to set by default the "min, max, close" to the right side. Ubuntu expects the world will change to follow them?

yzarc wrote on the 28 Mar 10 at 11:23
year! that's why they started promoting Linux at first.

clytle374 wrote on the 28 Mar 10 at 19:28
WHY? This sucks.

KIAaze (Idea reviewer) wrote on the 29 Mar 10 at 08:27
Voted Solution #28: adopt the XFCE placement approach in Gnome appearence prefs

KDE also offers the possibility configure the location of buttons in the title bar by the way. :)
Here's a screenshot:
http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/8407/kdetitlebarconfig1.png
(not the way I have it configured, but just to show off the possibilities)

Unfortunately, if Gnome continues with its philosophy of less options = easier to use, this will never happen...

KIAaze (Idea reviewer) wrote on the 29 Mar 10 at 08:31
Note: "Unfortunately", KDE doesn't allow placing anything else than the spacer more than one time.
That way one could have a close button on the left AND on the right. ^^
Maybe Gnome will do it better.

ave2 wrote on the 29 Mar 10 at 11:16
This is a terrible idea....I am always hitting the wrong items with my mouse, and can see me closing windows instead of pressing "file".

Sometimes I get the feeling that a lot of change is happening just for the sake of change- look at gnome for instance, there are some really odd "tweaks" happening there.

Im going to change this as soon as I install 10.04, but what happens when these "new" items appear in 10.10- will we still have that option? I hope so.


XrayA4T wrote on the 29 Mar 10 at 12:23
Well in the latest update they have made it theme dependent, so if you don't like ambiance/radiance, pick another theme and the buttons will be where they are in the current layout. If you like the light themes you can still swap the side and order of the buttons back to your preferred placement and they still look correct.

pczahra wrote on the 29 Mar 10 at 19:46
@29: only if the theme says so.

bjordan wrote on the 30 Mar 10 at 22:01
I completely agree with solution #1 move it back.

When I first installed Beta 1 it really caught me off guard. I moved the buttons back just fine, but still this shouldn't be the default.

Misclicks on the file menu is a good enough reason alone to move it back. Not to mention what users are used to.

rootchick wrote on the 1 Apr 10 at 15:02
Moving these buttons was a very poor choice. I support ubuntu machines in nine public libraries, for both patrons and staff, and I have no desire to spend hours fielding tech support complaints requesting these buttons be moved back. I realize it's possible to move them before releasing to users, but it's still really irritating. Been using linux for over a decade now, and it's instinctual to go for the buttons on the right.

sandys wrote on the 2 Apr 10 at 06:53
Now that the theme changes are not going to be changed back ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/532633/comments/564 ) - why is everyone downvoting the solution that people can choose a theme at install time: Solution #30

Guys, this is a LTS release. Sysadmins have to install these on dozens of machines. It would make life much, much, MUCH easier if we had the choice of a theme at install time.

Like @rootchick said, we have no desire spending hours fielding tech support questions about button placement.

Please atleast have a way of choosing the theme at install time.


ratdude747 wrote on the 5 Apr 10 at 05:21
dang, i wish i found a distro that looked like ubuntu used to, but had the speed of 10.04 and gnome based, so i can use gnome-shell.

oh, i made a new logo for ubuntu, considering Mark's attitude:

http://i42.tinypic.com/14o6o7t.jpg

(not to offend, but it's the truth)

santq wrote on the 5 Apr 10 at 21:53
I... just have no words for this (at least polite ones). I can accept that Canonical makes horrible design choices, but what troubles me is how little Canonical seems to care what the community has to say, even though Ubuntu is promoted as community project, where everyone can get involved. Or maybe that's just a nice way to say "free labour welcomed".

ratdude747 wrote on the 6 Apr 10 at 10:22
pretty much. at least 10.10 will have gnome shell, which should not allow the macbuntu effect to be as strong.

robindegen wrote on the 21 Apr 10 at 09:16
I specially registered to post my 2 cents about this as well. I have been annoyed quite a lot by this sudden random change. I really wonder how this came to be: "Hey guys! i have an idea! lets annoy everybody by moving the window controls to the left for no reason!" "very nice jim! here's a promotion!"

Move them back or provide the option. Thanks.

diazepam wrote on the 29 Apr 10 at 08:54
Put them back to where everyone knows where they are or at least give the option. Just spent the last 2 hours clicking wrong buttons due to years of them being on the other side.


james_s2010 wrote on the 30 Apr 10 at 16:18
I agree 100%
This was a very bad idea. Moving the buttons should be a user option. Kudos to Andrew for posting link on how to change them back to where they SHOULD be!
Also, don't know if it's just my system, but Ubuntu software center takes FOREVER to download/install anything! Watching network traffic while installing ubuntu extras ( flash ) showed tiny bursts of up to 128K transfers, separated by 15 to 45 seconds of NO transfer...

chromax wrote on the 30 Apr 10 at 22:13
Dear Ubuntu Development Team,

if you copy MacOS, then please copy the finder with the column folder view! ;-)

evit wrote on the 1 May 10 at 15:27
Epic fail! This was a bad idea! It makes Ubuntu more confusing to new users and annoys vets like me even more.


If I wanted a machine like OSX I would buy a crapple. I HATE the icons over there and its annoying the heck out of me. =(

numenory wrote on the 2 May 10 at 07:23
Been using ubuntu since the early days, it provided me with a more polished desktop experience than debian out of the box. (not to offend the any debian people, as I love debian)

I have to say, like others (or I'd say the majority), I'm not keen on the left placement. I don't care whether it's macbuntu or winbuntu or whatever.

Firstly keeping the buttons on the right does not make it winbuntu, you could just as easily call it unixbuntu. Most linux desktop setups whichever distro/desktop environment you come from have the buttons to the right. So from a point of wooing people the only people you are likely to woo are the mac people, not the windows people and clearly from the responses not the linux people.

With regard to the the above, I have no idea of the rationale for moving them.

Secondly and more importantly, when using apps such as firefox, or even gnome term, you open a tab, and where is the close button? On the right. What I'm trying to say is that it is inconsistent. Also another app that no longer fits is chrome, (I'm not sure of the general feeling in the community of this browser)in order to maintain a consistent feel now in ubuntu, I have to turn on 'use system title bar and borders' losing, well on my screen about half inch of screen real estate.

In my opinion there was, or at least as it stands in 10.04, there was no need to make the change. There seems no benefit in the change. I'm not saying change is bad, I will reserve judgement until 10.10, but for now I'm move my buttons back to the right.

crimsdings wrote on the 3 May 10 at 07:36
horrible idea .. switch back

blob8108 wrote on the 3 May 10 at 07:58
I tried having the buttons on both sides (minimize, maximise on left, close on right) and its actually quite nice, maybe this should be seriously considered...



(i set button layout to minimize,maximize,menu:close in gconf:
see
http://blog.daviey.com/blogroll/anything-but-the-buttons.html
)

sigbert wrote on the 3 May 10 at 12:24
Hi, thanks that a fast solution exist to move the buttons to the right.

valnuke wrote on the 5 May 10 at 14:03
I really can't understand why you changed something like this.... it was perfect, it was simply perfect.

please switch it BACK on the right and focus on more important things like raid1 full support

davedub wrote on the 8 May 10 at 11:51
A very bad idea. It is too close to the menus and it is far too 'mac', and it does mean I move my mouse to the right, tut to myself, and move to the left every time. Irritating.

At least put an option in the System->Preferences->Windows dialog to change it.

Not cool. Don't listen to any more ideas from whoever came up with this one - they have NO idea about HCI or usability!

calande wrote on the 8 May 10 at 17:08
This was a bad idea moving them to the left. I don't see any compelling reason for having done that. I wasn't comfortable using the buttons on the left-hand side, so I reverted their position using this tutorial: http://lifehacker.com/5500577/move-ubuntus-window-buttons-back-to-the-right

jasinski wrote on the 12 May 10 at 02:04
The developers who made this choice have shown their total disrespect to the Ubuntu motto -- "Linux for Human Beings". Or did they suppose normal human beings would like when buttons that always have been on the right side showed up on the opposite corner?

Unlike many posts above, I'm also against making it depending on the selected theme. No need to confuse the users any more than it was already accomplished.

As for the developers/decision makers, I believe no one should be allowed to touch the keyboard and write a single line of code before understanding what 'fitting the user model' means. Everyone should read Joel's excelent post on the subject (http://www.joelonsoftware.com/uibook/chapters/fog0000000058.html). Another good reference is the book 'The Design of Everyday Things', by Donald A. Norman.

It really stinks to me that this was introduced so late in the release process. The arrogant pukes who decided on it were probably afraid that they would have heard *lots* of complaints - from normal people! from human beings! arrghhh!!

Shame on you guys... Please read all the posts here and learn a lesson on humility.

Auzy wrote on the 12 May 10 at 05:17
Now that they have moved then.. they should stay. But it has shown me that the developers are rushing changes, and doing them for the sake of doing things differently rather than with a purpose..

gauzz wrote on the 1 Jun 10 at 22:15
So I had this file and I wanted to save it, so I had the great idea of saving it by pressing file/save as... but then I aimed a bit too high and then BOOM the program exits and asks me to ¨close without saving/cancel/save¨, I was so tired and confused for that menu pop-up that I wanted to make it disappear so I choose ¨close without saving¨... big mistake. Also if you have a maximized window and click on the applications menu all the options will be on top of the window buttons, that didn't happened (so much) when the buttons were on the right (not a big deal maybe since the window looses focus anyways). Also the left side of the window looks so overcharged/unbalanced with so many options don't you think so?

I think that many of the complaints are from people that can't get used to changes quickly, I can get used to in a couple of days but this isn't helping Ubuntu, you have to consider that even if you all developer guys have Macs still most of the people in the world uses Windows and are used to having their windows buttons on the right hand side of the screen. Doing this on a LTS release just baffles me. I guess Ubuntu is not a democracy.

Changing the subject a bit 10.04 is slower with my video card Ge-force 8400M GS, and Plymouth sucks with it's low resolution default settings, it's buggy too, I'm using the 173 driver. Also what's up with that Mac-inspired wallpaper? Those cold colors make me feel depressed, I changed it obviously.

9.10 has been the best release to this date.

And please don't fix anything if it isn't broken.

matsuri wrote on the 3 Jun 10 at 12:02
Why do we do everything what apple does? I dont want this apple shit like a pussy purple desktop and left-aligned buttons.. this is soooo ridiculous

Nxx wrote on the 13 Jun 10 at 22:09
You know, Mac is expensive and prestigious. It if fashionable unlike Windows. If one sees a guy with Apple, he thinks "it's a cool guy with money". Several days ago I met blonde girl who said me "I have a notebook with MacOS". She thought she would impress me. If you want to be fashionable and prestigious you should look like MacOS. Ubuntu is MacOS for poor.

Auzy wrote on the 14 Jun 10 at 06:34
I'd disagree Nxx. Those who are fashionable don't really care which OS they are using honestly. Apple just portrays their OS as fashionable. Also, On OSX, many people don't use the buttons to close (their positioning isn't great), but rather the task bar.

Auzy wrote on the 14 Jun 10 at 06:47
Also, honestly, I don't think Canonical did it because OSX did, graphics people only like the look of the hardware (without being aware that even Dell has nice looking laptops these days), and finally, I wouldn't say Ubuntu/OSX targets the same crowd.


gfd_2 wrote on the 24 Aug 10 at 03:25
I Copied and :asted this at the prompt in terminal (and kudos to the marvo who wrote it: gconftool-2 --type string --set /apps/metacity/general/button_layout "menu:minimize,maximize,close"

You have the option for Right or Left.

robsku wrote on the 20 Nov 10 at 06:25
It's *nix, I don't see why Gnome (or ANY wm/de for that matter) could not easily have totally theme independent system where you could arrange any possible (there can be quite a few, like in some Enlightenment DR16 themes) items (icon, buttons, title) could be arranged any way you like - Firefox presents a perfect way (as does Gnome desktop bars) for arranging items on bars, and it would work just as perfectly with desktop title bars.

Except maybe like some KB optimized tiling WM's that don't have nor need anything but title text in the top bar. But in those you don't need it - I use Ion myself and while in it I don't miss them but when (like right now) working on someones ubuntu, configuring it. I like the "traditional" titlebar but really wonder why is something like my idea already done.

As last note, it could be placed so that it's easy to find, yet does not seem confusing when Joe Windows sees it in menu or setting windows tab - Gnome and Ubuntu both have history on doing just that better and better :)

jamesdcarroll wrote on the 25 Nov 10 at 19:50
Absolute and epic fail. Bug 1 is to end Microsoft's dominance, not Apple's. This will serve no purpose other than perturb Win users trying to migrate who already coming in with high "I don't like different!!" levels. This runs 180 degrees counter to Bug 1 and should be reversed and the sooner the better.

nickr wrote on the 29 Dec 10 at 12:43
Does the original poster know that he can change the location and arrangement of the min/max/close buttons to appear where ever he wants on the Window Border by using gconf-editor?

qlwik wrote on the 14 Apr 11 at 15:14
Exacly, you can configure it whatever you like, that why this is called linux.

cheesehead (Brainstorm admin) wrote on the 7 Jul 11 at 05:01
10.04 came out. They didn't move the buttons.
Er, pre-release feedback really needs to go through the mailing lists or bug tracker. Brainstorm feedback simply won't reach developers before the release.
Closing in Brainstorm.


Post your comment