Written by darkevolution the 9 Feb 12 at 19:42.

We have to remove an option for the launcher's behaviour, so I think we should drop "Always hide" because just a few people are using this option.

It's similar to dodge windows but not so convenient...

A solution should be to keep "Never Hide" and "Dodge Windows"

We have to remove an option for the launcher's behaviour, so I think we should drop "Always hide" because just a few people are using this option. It's similar to dodge windows but not so convenient... A solution should be to keep "Never Hide" and "Dodge Windows"

Written by darkshvein the 9 Feb 12 at 16:45.

Same

Same

Written by Ar29 the 9 Feb 12 at 13:00.

With keyboard commands and mouse clicks should be worked efficiently. To improve the click efficiency is a continuous improvement process. A study or major analysis or Ubuntu brainstorm can help. Two suggestions can be found above (date and audio player).

With keyboard commands and mouse clicks should be worked efficiently. To improve the click efficiency is a continuous improvement process. A study or major analysis or Ubuntu brainstorm can help. Two suggestions can be found above (date and audio player).

Written by blueadept the 7 Feb 12 at 10:22.

It would be nice to have the ability to securely delete this keyring after a user specified number of failed logins.

This would benefit mobile users who might loose their device and be subject to "password guessing"...

It would also have the effect of rendering an encrypted homedir inaccessible without the recovery key generated at install time, and so users would have a greater degree of assurance that their data was secure on a lost laptop even if the password was relatively insecure.

It would be nice to have the ability to securely delete this keyring after a user specified number of failed logins. This would benefit mobile users who might loose their device and be subject to "password guessing"... It would also have the effect of rendering an encrypted homedir inaccessible without the recovery key generated at install time, and so users would have a greater degree of assurance that their data was secure on a lost laptop even if the password was relatively insecure.

Written by blueadept the 7 Feb 12 at 10:50.

Many mobile devices now have a facility to remotely wipe a lost/stolen device. Infact in some industries this is a requirement for a mobile device to be used.

I suggest that in addition to Solution #1, Ubuntu One could be used to flag a device for remote wipe, possibly on a per-user basis since U1 is associated with a user rather than a device.

Many mobile devices now have a facility to remotely wipe a lost/stolen device. Infact in some industries this is a requirement for a mobile device to be used. I suggest that in addition to Solution #1, Ubuntu One could be used to flag a device for remote wipe, possibly on a per-user basis since U1 is associated with a user rather than a device.

Written by SethHikari the 8 Feb 12 at 22:47.

Similar to Windows 8. Not to conform to what Windows does but recognizing it as a good and helpful idea.

Similar to Windows 8. Not to conform to what Windows does but recognizing it as a good and helpful idea.

Written by testian the 6 Feb 12 at 19:45.

This negative space is like the middle part of a paper fold in an N-shape.

The windows would then be the vertical parts of the N.

As you know windows with equal Z or depth location (this is normally not possible) can't overlap.

Now what happens to the N-shape if you try to make the two vertical parts onto the same layer/Z-Location? The N-shape is unfold and the negative space becomes positive (or 0 if you look at it as a unstretching rubber band). The 2 windows are now tiled.

In other words: Window tiling can be done by having one window trespassing the Z-Space of another window, forcing the windows to move out of their ways with a smooth animation.

To reduce the amount of locations in Z, windows which do not overlap have the same location in Z if there is no evidence that they can't be in the same Z-location (a window is between them and overlaps with both).

Note that in this solution there is no visible grid, but I think (but I'm not sure) mathematically any window arrangement situation as we have them in todays window managers can be described using a grid with irregular cell sizes IF negative spaces are allowed to do the overlapping.

This negative space is like the middle part of a paper fold in an N-shape. The windows would then be the vertical parts of the N. As you know windows with equal Z or depth location (this is normally not possible) can't overlap. Now what happens to the N-shape if you try to make the two vertical parts onto the same layer/Z-Location? The N-shape is unfold and the negative space becomes positive (or 0 if you look at it as a unstretching rubber band). The 2 windows are now tiled. In other words: Window tiling can be done by having one window trespassing the Z-Space of another window, forcing the windows to move out of their ways with a smooth animation. To reduce the amount of locations in Z, windows which do not overlap have the same location in Z if there is no evidence that they can't be in the same Z-location (a window is between them and overlaps with both). Note that in this solution there is no visible grid, but I think (but I'm not sure) mathematically any window arrangement situation as we have them in todays window managers can be described using a grid with irregular cell sizes IF negative spaces are allowed to do the overlapping.

Written by R-man the 3 Feb 12 at 16:24.

You can not place aplications in this menu (like in Gnome 3)
but it must work without compiz. Compiz not work in 2d mode, and it bad work on old computers. Will great if you make analog of Mac OS Mission Control.

You can not place aplications in this menu (like in Gnome 3) but it must work without compiz. Compiz not work in 2d mode, and it bad work on old computers. Will great if you make analog of Mac OS Mission Control.

Written by mitcoes the 25 Jan 12 at 18:46.

Upgrading with the ISO, grub2 and rebooting, formatting and installing - spliting / and /home if they are not splited yet - will be faster than actual method.

Or choose to UPGRADE from the LiveCD/DVD when booting the ISO at the HDD or SDD from GRUB2

And of course at first as an OPTION.

I upgraded instead of doing it with multisystem becasuse a bug -reported - with the pangolin installer, but instaling oneiric and upgrading is a waste of time compared with the system I suggest.

Upgrading with the ISO, grub2 and rebooting, formatting and installing - spliting / and /home if they are not splited yet - will be faster than actual method. Or choose to UPGRADE from the LiveCD/DVD when booting the ISO at the HDD or SDD from GRUB2 And of course at first as an OPTION. I upgraded instead of doing it with multisystem becasuse a bug -reported - with the pangolin installer, but instaling oneiric and upgrading is a waste of time compared with the system I suggest.