<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Add Screenshots to Packages]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/9685/</link>
    <description><![CDATA[I miss screenshots in synaptic.<br />It would be very nice to see the features of the program in a screenshot. Then you can better decide if you want this program or use an other.<br /><br />Additional pictures could be used to show a foto of the development team or something similar.<br /><br />And if that is realized it could be possible to build tutorial videos into the debs to see in synaptic how cou can use the program.<br /><br />
<br />


<b>[144 votes] Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #9685</b>
<br />

<br />
<br />



]]></description>

    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:19:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/9685/</guid>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Primož Papič</title>
  <description><![CDATA[That kind of a ideas we need! +1(0000)]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from n2</title>
  <description><![CDATA[-1<br />This is what project websites are for. If you want more information than the Synaptic description provides, go to their website.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Vadim P.</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Yeah? How many project websites don't tell you to "stfu, you're on linux, go compile. mac users, here's your .dmg, windows users, here's your .exe"? Not a lot.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Auzy</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I agree with this idea. It makes it easy to rapidly go through the repo and find stuff you like. <br /><br />+1. <br /><br />Getting screenshots off a project website is silly, and in some cases, its a 5 step procedure just to access them]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from fcsonline</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Great! +1<br /><br />But may be in another tab like 'More information about the package'...]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from svergeylen</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I think that Synaptic must continue to display a simple descriptin.<br /><br />But the "Add/remove programs", which is really more for the big public should be more and more attractive with screenshots and demonstration, linked with the project page<br /><br />This would increase the information in the bottom frame in the "add=remove programs" and provide more eye-candy info.<br /><br />Instead of this, synaptic offers access to program and librairies which do not have GUI, so there will be no screenshot at all for these "programs"]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Liquen</title>
  <description><![CDATA[+1 for svergeylen comment.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from droetker</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Whow. great idea.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from thebinaryblob</title>
  <description><![CDATA[+1<br />great idea<br /><br />I agree with svergeylen<br /><br />I like this idea, but it only makes sense for graphical programs<br />this would only be benificial for gnome-app-install and adept<br />synaptic doesnt really need this]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from uaneme</title>
  <description><![CDATA[if every package had a clickable link to start with that would already be a huge improvement<br /><br />a screenschot on every package ...i think it would slow things down.<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from fazillatheef</title>
  <description><![CDATA[for those who have broadband this maybe a good idea... because this will use bandwidth even when updating package lists.... because these images are needed before installation... and maintaining those screenshots is again a problem... I think other things are more important... a link to the website is a very good idea.. <br /><br />When ubuntu reaches maturity it will include software for all purposes in a default installation... making a complete operating system... then there wont be need for installing individual applications... the user just needs to tell what software he prefers and the system will only update those softwares and ofcourse security updates...<br /><br />That is when repository based installation will take over windows method of installation ...click and run..]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Auzy</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I dont think they meant that they would sync the screenshots too fazillatheef. That wouldn't make any sense. <br /><br />Instead, there would be just a way for APT to lookup screenshots, so they could be shown. <br /><br /><br />And ubuntu will never include software for all purposes in the default install. For starters, my car PC requires programs to access the cars ECU and such (OBD2 link). It would be silly to add that by default. ]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from tenplus1</title>
  <description><![CDATA[-1...  Check the author's website...  How big do you think the repo's will get when you add screenshots for every program...  exactly!]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from melhor</title>
  <description><![CDATA[@tenplus1:<br />I agree with your opinion not to put the screenshots in the repo's or even worse on the livecd.<br />But the information could be loaded from the internet (webservice or something like that) as soon as the tab "more information about this package" is opened.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from snizovtsev</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Great idea!<br />But... How to load this information? Store screenshots in package cache or .desktop files is not good idea.<br />I think Canonical should create software.ubuntu.com site with descriptions, translated descriptions, screenshots and comments. gnome-app-install should load this information from site or integrate to firefox "apt plugin" to provide "One Click Install" from web sites.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from macsim</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Why not propose to get more info, user click on "get more" synaptic connect to author website where a xml file (RSS Style) gives video/screenshot path on the web ?<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from bobbo</title>
  <description><![CDATA[This would have to be implemented at the apt frontend level (Synaptic), to search for screenshots somewhere (no idea where) and display them.<br /><br />It would be very difficult to implement this at the raw package level. It would mean going through every single package, adding a non-standard field to the packages control file and having a massive delta between Debian.<br /><br />This would mean that it would be impossible to directly sync packages from Debian (like what happens currently) so every new upstream in Debian would have to be hand merged, which is a massive overhead of work for us developers.<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Auzy</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Why Bobbo? No it doesn't! <br /><br />All you need to do is set up a seperate database, and synaptic can search the database like: http://pornage.ubuntu.com/package?request=screenshots&packagename=grub2&version=2.2.2.2&repo=official<br /><br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from bobbo</title>
  <description><![CDATA[It would be possible to implement it like that, but it would have to be maintained entirely by a volunteer group (Ubuntu Screenshots Group) as the MOTU's already have too much to do. If it were handled like this and the dedicated group took screenshots of every application after every update, then yes, if it was merged into Synaptic, it would be pretty useful.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Vadim P.</title>
  <description><![CDATA[@Auzy, for a moment I thought that link was real :(]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from data</title>
  <description><![CDATA[it is worked on:<br />http://screenshots.debian.net/packages<br /><br />That is really cool....]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
      </channel>
</rss>
