Look at:
"† Choice of one media player
* Only available with Real Player "
I want the same for windows media codecs, I don't want MS to receive money for software they didn't make, I must say that I am quite turned down a bit by this, it is a bad precedent to see Canonical to paying a MS tax in such a critical project as Remix.
While we are at it, could we have an ubuntu remix that's as decent as the real ubuntu in regards to freedom? As in... you need to opt-in in order to install restricted stuff? I don't want things to get over expensive because I am paying for things like flash or adobe reader or MS' codecs. In all seriousness, aren't there FOSS PDF readers for portables? That thing got even open office so...
What? Adobe Reader? Why do we need this bloated piece of propriety nagware, when we have the fast/lean Evince. I can't fully remember, but I'm pretty sure that it (Evince) fits fine on the Eee's resolution.
It was probably requested by the OEM's. They decide what goes on there (and if it doesn't, they'll either add it, or not ship ubuntu but some other distro happily. Take Xandros).
And hey, look, conspiracy theory people: "The new launcher is free software - so far, everything Canonical has funded, written and published for general public use on Ubuntu has been under the GPL. Currently we use GPLv3.". Taken from 'http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/151'. Please quiet down now, and let Ubuntu make at least some progress in being self-sustainable.