<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Update Firefox 3 beta 5 to RC1]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/8808/</link>
    <description><![CDATA[There is a logic for this in my opinion:<br /><br />1 - Improve usability, stability and speed for Firefox users in Ubuntu. Beta 5 has some big issues.<br /><br />2 - This also would help the Mozilla dev team because there would be thousand of users using RC1 instead of Beta5.<br /><br />3 - The "Beta" can confuse some users.<br /><br /><br />So, what do you think?<br />
<br />


<b>[663 votes] Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #8808</b>
<br />

<br />
<br />



]]></description>

    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 10:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 06:47:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/8808/</guid>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from XVIIarcano</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I think that the passage is quite obvious and I would be puzzled by the opposite.<br /><br />+1 anyway, just in case... ;)]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from lambdoid</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Great idea. I've had major issues with b5 - crashing constantly, freezes and poor performance on Flash sites.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Eldmannen</title>
  <description><![CDATA[lambdoid,<br />That is the Adobe Flash plugin that is buggy.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 13:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from unrealfighter</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I've just posted this idea yesterday. Bother to check for duplicates before going click-happy.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Auzy</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I KNEW I had seen this, but I couldn't find it unrealfigher (maybe change ur description to include RC1 in there, or firefox3 instead of firefox, to make it easier to search). <br /><br />Thats why I haven't commented this yet..]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from MarcoSilva</title>
  <description><![CDATA[unrealfighter i did search for it, didnt find the ideia sorry]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from nami</title>
  <description><![CDATA[yes definitely, this RC cannot be as bad as the current beta which is awful!]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 16:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from scherer13</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I don't understand why when you used firefox b5 in windows you can just go to Help->Check for Updates, but in Ubuntu you have to wait for them to send up the updates in the repos. Why can't it just be straight from mozilla?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from bochecha</title>
  <description><![CDATA[OMG!!!<br /><br />Will there be an idea in Brainstorm every time a program included in Ubuntu gets a new release upstream ?<br /><br />Do you think that the Ubuntu devs are waiting for you to say "hey, program X has a new update. Come on you lazy packagers, just update it in Ubuntu!" ???<br /><br />You get a -1 for this.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 21:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from MarcoSilva</title>
  <description><![CDATA[bochecha that is not the issue where.<br /><br />The think is I read that the maintainers were going to wait for the final release of FF3. That is why I created this.<br /><br />I know how the package and repositories system works in Ubuntu...]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 22:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from white_noise</title>
  <description><![CDATA[In development, hooray!<br />+1]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from 6205</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Where is the problem? Simply download linux Firefox from Mozilla and replace files across your system...<br /><br />Do you thing that Ubuntu is using some special, magic version of Firefox, compiled in full moon on holy PC desktops? :))<br /><br />I don't thing that they had changed something in source code, so there is no need to wait for developers, developers, developers :)]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 13:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from wladston</title>
  <description><![CDATA[can't wait to have a usable computer ....<br /><br />every time, I have to reboot my system because firefox - or better, freezefox, will make it freeze at some point!]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 21:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from bochecha</title>
  <description><![CDATA[@wladston: the freeze is a known bug. Not fixed in RC1 though.<br /><br />It doesn't even seem like the Firefox devs are willing to fix it before final release as it is critical and wasn't fixed in RC (which is usually a real final release)... :S<br /><br />Here is the bug report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421482<br /><br />Seems related to this bug in the Kernel: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9546<br />(hint hint, if any Ubuntu dev comes here ^^)]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from wladston</title>
  <description><![CDATA[bochecha,<br /><br />that's bad .... hardy was the one ubuntu release with I had the largest and most terrible types of regressions ... :( <br /><br />Hopefully they will fix that on firefox 3 ... I can't wait to try out freezefox rc1, thought ... some people reported to have a better cpu/system load using it ...]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from gsiliceo</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I hope they implement the patch for the freezing problem before updating the repositories.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 00:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from futwick</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Is there an ETA for this?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 22:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from DShepherd</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Can we stop creating an 'idea' everytime there's a new version of some software. Its not very useful.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 04:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from m_gol</title>
  <description><![CDATA[@ DShepherd:<br />I agree, but RC1 was shipped on May 16 and now we have May 27 and it still isn't here. So this idea is fully justified. I only hope that final new versions of Fx3 will find their way to repos a lot faster...]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 04:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Auzy</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Bochecha, as written on a major digg re-post, stop hyping up bugs that are in a RC. <br /><br />Mozilla already said, they are working on fixing it. <br /><br />In the future, please refrain from posting bug reports which you heard from some noob in digg.. ]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 09:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from peetie</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Upstream version of major applications will not, and should not, be updated outside of releases (8.04.[1-9] or 8.10).  <br /><br />Every upstream application puts out new releases from time to time which fix and cause new bugs.  The most important fixes are generally cherry picked by released distro version from those applications to fix major issues, but without major testing new upstream versions are not (and should not) be added to a released distro version.<br /><br />However, you can add hardy-proposed and hardy-backports to get some of the upcoming (incompletely tested) updates, or you can track 8.10 if you must always have the latest versions all of the time, or you can track 8.04.x if you want all of the untested versions of packages targeted for the next point release.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from clickwir</title>
  <description><![CDATA["This is planned, but currently most of the Ubuntu-mozilla team is at the Ubuntu Developer Summit so please be patient."<br /><br />https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UDS-Intrepid/<br /><br />ok... "When: Monday 19th May to Friday 23rd May 2008"<br /><br />Today is the 28th. I'm sorry, I seem like an ass here. What can we do to help?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 03:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from anabelle</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Is this really that difficult? <br /><br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 21:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from anabelle</title>
  <description><![CDATA[FINALLY!!! ITS UPDATING RIGHT NOW! :D]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 00:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from m_gol</title>
  <description><![CDATA[@ anabelle:<br />I don't see it in repo... You mean hardy-updates or hardy-proposed?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 04:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from m_gol</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Great. RC2 is coming in a few days and there is still no RC1 in repo...]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from m_gol</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Oh, I haven't seen that developers' information changed. There will be no Fx3 RC's in hardy-updates then. OK. Good to know. But it looks little strange to read this:<br />http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=4993809&postcount=61<br />info saying sth about "assuming and misinformation". ;)]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from DShepherd</title>
  <description><![CDATA[please mark this as implremented. ]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
      </channel>
</rss>
