Ubuntu QA:
BlogBrainstormPackage status
Log in
Ubuntu QA
The Ubuntu community has contributed 22700 ideas, 138270 comments, 2629576 votes
Idea sandbox Idea sandbox
Popular ideas Popular ideas
Ideas in development Ideas in development
Implemented ideas Implemented ideas
Idea #8303: Solve Global Warming

bug This idea is a duplicate of Idea #81: Power Management.
Written by amiga_os the 9 May 08 at 19:41. Category: Hardware support. Related project: Nothing/Others. Status: New
Rationale
As part of my secret plan to raise the standard of "Impossible Ideas" on Brainstorm - I want to keep setting people's eyes higher.

And this is particularly off the back of the comments on my last "Impossible Idea".

I propose Ubuntu solve the Global Warming crisis.

Obviously this needs to be broken down into a series of achievable steps:
1) Better power management in the kernel.
2) Merge rival projects such as [Ubuntu, Red Hat, Debian, Suse] and [Linux, BSD, Solaris], a bit like Compiz-Fusion. This would relieve the planet of a lot of "hot air".
3) Make powersaving and economical decisions as standard on Ubuntu - e.g. single rather than double clicks for files; dark screen colours by default; oh and supply thermocouples as standard on Dellbuntu machines to produce electricity from waste heat.
4) How about a new official derivative of Ubuntu that runs purely on Hydrogen, called, Hybuntu?
5) Finally... there's a button on my laptop that can turn the brightness down. Ubuntu has had native support for this button since Dapper. Build such a button for lowering the brightness of the sun, and develop native support for this button in Ubuntu.

Due to the hardware requirements of this idea, I stuck it in Hardware Support.
Tags: (none)

-14
votes
closed
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #8303
Written by amiga_os the 9 May 08 at 19:41.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #8303 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

Propose your solution

Attachments
No attachments.


Duplicates


Comments
jhoger wrote on the 9 May 08 at 20:37
-1 PureNoise

Dude.

If there were a Sarcasm category and I had the ability to hide all such ideas I think this would be just fine.

Sadly it ain't so.

I'd enter the idea of "Add a Sarcasm category" just for you but it would be voted down for the wrong reason...

jhoger wrote on the 9 May 08 at 20:39
Note amiga_os that some of us browse BS @latest ideas. So we have to sift through these.

amiga_os wrote on the 9 May 08 at 21:24
I've only entered 2 - that's one each day. That's certainly not enough for a sarcasm category.

Let's be realistic... there's no major *sifting* required. And I've been careful not to suggest anything that is in and of itself offensive.

But - for the sake of community relations - I won't enter any more sarcastic ideas. This obviously upsets people more than I expected.

Eldmannen wrote on the 9 May 08 at 22:32
We need ACPI 3.0b support.

pepperpupper wrote on the 9 May 08 at 23:19
this hurts this site... if you do like ths, more ppl will and in the end the whole site will be cluttered

nazgand wrote on the 10 May 08 at 00:23
http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/news.php

You are so very ignorant...the governments own official archive show a small decrease in temperature, and the acres of forest is growing - they plant more trees across the world than they chop. The reality of global warming has nothing to do with the political FUD hype, it has to do with the natural rhythms of the sun, and CO2 is in fact not a pollutant, it is needed by plants to make oxygen for us to breath. I could go on, and give links to official sources, but - this may surprise some people - I have better things to do.

Auzy wrote on the 10 May 08 at 02:19
Give it a rest nazgand... we aint greenpeace.

If you donate money to me amiga, I'll give it a go.


olskar wrote on the 23 May 08 at 19:29
I dont think that this idea should be merged with the main-powersaving-idea.

This is sarcastic and people therefore vote negative. This should not be able to affect the real non-sarcastic powersaving-idea.


Post your comment