Ubuntu QA:
BlogBrainstormPackage status
Log in
Ubuntu QA
The Ubuntu community has contributed 12357 ideas, 58479 comments, 1187050 votes

Idea #8196: Marking ideas by the priority level



up
61
down
Written by Primož Papič the 7 May 08 at 19:16. Category: Brainstorm.
Related to: Nothing/Others. Status: New
Description
I got this idea from jhoger which said:
"Unfortunately Brainstorm doesn't allow an indication of what we think the priority should be"

I don't think this is such a bad idea. This would reduce the negative vote because someone think this is not an priority for CANONICAL or something like that...
the priority level could be set by the idea proponent, but could be changed by voting for or against the idea.
There would be three priority levels: High, Medium, Low.
With voting for or against the priority level would change.
So lets say that this idea gets 1000 votes and i marked it with medium, so it change from medium to high (I think that 1000 votes is enough for high priority or maybe even higher?)
And same if this idea is voted down to let say -50 it would get low priority.
----
The other idea is that voting would be separate of normal voting. but this could be a bit more complex...
Tags: (none)

Attachments
No attachments.


Duplicates


Comments
jhoger wrote on the 7 May 08 at 19:40
Another way to do this is to have the priority be completely independent of the vote.

So, I could vote +1 but qualify it as "Low Priority."

Sort the priority responses with high highest and low, lowest. Report the priority and report the median priority value along with the vote tally.

Or, just allow a more fine grained reason to go with the vote which is a an idea I actually did propose...

pimlottc wrote on the 16 May 08 at 16:04
Tracking priority is a good idea, but shouldn't be linked to vote count. For example, just because a lot of people notice a typo doesn't mean it should be high priority (http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/402/).

LC всадник cbet wrote on the 17 May 08 at 03:45
I agree with the idea but the priority I think could only be voted by someone that voted on it not by the same person who posted it in order to avoid some "smart ass" from posting bad ideas as high priorities. +1


Post your comment