<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[WiFi] Support for Atheros chipsets like the AR5418]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/6589/</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Ubuntu should have better native support for the Atheros wifi chipsets, which give huge problems in Ubuntu at the moment. <br /><br />For example, MadWifi does not work properly/stable with the popular AR5418-chipset.<br />
<br />


<b>[82 votes] Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #6589</b>
<br />

<br />
<br />



]]></description>

    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:26:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/6589/</guid>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Auzy</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Yeah, this is a big one. I have a DWA-556 pci-express wireless card (802.11n), and because people here say that ndiswrapper should not be installed by default, I need to do some dodgy stuff to get ndiswrapper installed, and the card working.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from fluo</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I would give you a hundred points if I could. <br />Meanwhile: +1]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from kevmitch</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Agreed, this is a huge pain in the ass. Unfortunately, its out of Ubuntu developers' hands. The AR5418 driver in madwifi is only available as an alpha tester (though it has seen some significant improvement of late). Since all official Ubuntu packages must be from "released" software, we'll have to wait on the madwifi people to polish the edges a bit more before its ready to include in the distribution. <br /><br />Who you should really send your feedback to however is Atheros who can't be bothered to offer a Linux driver at all let alone an open source one. Better yet give the FCC or your local radio frequency regulator an earful on their draconian policies which stifle open source. Atheros cannot however defer responsibility to regulatory agencies when Intel has managed to implement their own open source drivers. Though these admittedly use dubious firmware blobs, it could be argued that this is better than running mystery code on your actual CPU. ]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from nicedude</title>
  <description><![CDATA[If you asked me a month ago I would say yes it needs to be better supported by default since my AR5007 caused me pains to install in both Gutsy & in Hardy was even worse. But now I would say that it forced me to learn several important subjects like building drivers & installing them manually ( especially in Hardy as I now just rip out the restricted driver manager "Jockey" & Restricted modules so I do my own Nvidia drivers too ). So I learned more about Ubuntu and linux in general in my little trial by fire in a month then I probably would have in 6 months if it was MS Windows easy Click Click. And also since I wanted to use aircrack with my card I needed drivers patched for that as well and I wouldn't think the Ubuntu developers will be using those anytime soon ( someone correct me if I am wrong ). So I actually enjoyed the forced learning in this case as I now don't have to choose from what is standard or in the repositories and can roll my own :-)]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 08:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Auzy</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Done.. refer to http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/11585/]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
      </channel>
</rss>
