<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Protect the user from disk failure]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/4913/</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Modern hard drives provide a means of telling the user if they are likely to fail called S.M.A.R.T. (Self-Monitoring, Analysis, and Reporting Technology). Although this is a de-facto standard no major operating system currently supports it out of the box.<br /><br />While there are many S.M.A.R.T. tools for Windows included in system related products of third parties (e.g. Norton System Doctor) what somewhat raises the awareness of this problem, the only usable product for Linux is smartmontools. <br />The target group of this are, however, professionals. (This suite contains a command line tool and a daemon.)<br /><br />Because hard drive failure is a often underestimated and neglected problem until it occurs, the user should be protected the best way without even knowing about it.<br /><br />Therefore, I suggest to integrate smartmontools into Ubuntu in a smart and user friendly way. Providing a second barrier (besides backups) to hard drive failure.<br /><br />Of course, the user is to be notified on dangerous situations by graphical means (e.g. a dialogue box, a message on login or in some not easily negligible way). To further ease rescuing the system, the user should be presented a "rescue wizard" allowing for easy bringing one's data to a safe harbour.<br />
<br />


<b>[347 votes] Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #4913</b>
<br />

<br />
<br />



]]></description>

    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/4913/</guid>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Auzy</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I trust you have not seen the research by Google that suggests smart isn't all its cracked up to be?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Auzy</title>
  <description><![CDATA[+1 anyway, but just be aware, smart is not reliable enough to get users out of trouble safely. We should instead make drive mirroring easy to do, and backups, so that they don't get into the mess in the first place. But its a good idea anyway. Might as well use everything we have]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Eldmannen</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I agree.<br />Kinda pointless to have a disk with S.M.A.R.T if its never used.<br />I really hate when the disk crashes, everyone hates it!]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from sebsauvage</title>
  <description><![CDATA[SMART saved my life TWICE. I swear.<br />The first time, the disk died 2 days later.<br />The second time, the disk died 5 days later.<br /><br />There is already a GUI for SMART tools: <br />sudo aptitude install smart-notifier<br /><br />And you're ready to run.<br /><br />It's unobtrusive, and will silentely monitor harddisk status.<br />A popup will show up on potentiel HD problem.<br /><br />It would be a good idea to install this packaged by default on Ubuntu.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from sebsauvage</title>
  <description><![CDATA[@Auzy: Yes, SMART will not replace a backup. But as you cannot force people to have a good backup procedures, Smart-notifier will be a life-saver.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Wouter.de.Groot</title>
  <description><![CDATA[The title is misleading, though. This could help to prevent data loss, but it would by no means be able to offer any kind of guarantee.<br />While I think this may be a good idea, it should not be touted as protection.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from _sebastian_</title>
  <description><![CDATA[this would not increase protection, but a warning message about you HDD state/condition could trigger the _last minute_ backup saving you from a HDD crash.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from fordplay</title>
  <description><![CDATA[http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/3343/]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from hgibson</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Badly needed. In six years of user support for Linux this is the most dramatic event to happen to a user. I made a policy of backing up the NFS mounted home folders to try to get around this. However I had to impose disk quota's (my backup server only has so much disk space). So I created a local folder for general storage. And guess what.. it's what was on the general folder that users put stuff and wanted it back after a disk failure.<br /><br />In South Africa with power load shedding it is critical !]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
      </channel>
</rss>
