Ubuntu QA:
BlogBrainstormPackage status
Log in
Ubuntu QA
The Ubuntu community has contributed 16602 ideas, 102352 comments, 2137701 votes
Idea sandbox Idea sandbox
Popular ideas Popular ideas
Ideas in development Ideas in development
Implemented ideas Implemented ideas
Idea #4913: Protect the user from disk failure

Written by materthron the 17 Mar 08 at 14:00. Category: Security. Related project: Nothing/Others. Status: New
Rationale
Modern hard drives provide a means of telling the user if they are likely to fail called S.M.A.R.T. (Self-Monitoring, Analysis, and Reporting Technology). Although this is a de-facto standard no major operating system currently supports it out of the box.

While there are many S.M.A.R.T. tools for Windows included in system related products of third parties (e.g. Norton System Doctor) what somewhat raises the awareness of this problem, the only usable product for Linux is smartmontools.
The target group of this are, however, professionals. (This suite contains a command line tool and a daemon.)

Because hard drive failure is a often underestimated and neglected problem until it occurs, the user should be protected the best way without even knowing about it.

Therefore, I suggest to integrate smartmontools into Ubuntu in a smart and user friendly way. Providing a second barrier (besides backups) to hard drive failure.

Of course, the user is to be notified on dangerous situations by graphical means (e.g. a dialogue box, a message on login or in some not easily negligible way). To further ease rescuing the system, the user should be presented a "rescue wizard" allowing for easy bringing one's data to a safe harbour.
Tags: (none)

347
votes
closed
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #4913
Written by materthron the 17 Mar 08 at 14:00.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #4913 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

Propose your solution

Attachments
No attachments.


Duplicates


Comments
Auzy wrote on the 17 Mar 08 at 14:23
I trust you have not seen the research by Google that suggests smart isn't all its cracked up to be?

Auzy wrote on the 17 Mar 08 at 14:36
+1 anyway, but just be aware, smart is not reliable enough to get users out of trouble safely. We should instead make drive mirroring easy to do, and backups, so that they don't get into the mess in the first place. But its a good idea anyway. Might as well use everything we have

Eldmannen wrote on the 17 Mar 08 at 15:13
I agree.
Kinda pointless to have a disk with S.M.A.R.T if its never used.
I really hate when the disk crashes, everyone hates it!

sebsauvage wrote on the 17 Mar 08 at 15:29
SMART saved my life TWICE. I swear.
The first time, the disk died 2 days later.
The second time, the disk died 5 days later.

There is already a GUI for SMART tools:
sudo aptitude install smart-notifier

And you're ready to run.

It's unobtrusive, and will silentely monitor harddisk status.
A popup will show up on potentiel HD problem.

It would be a good idea to install this packaged by default on Ubuntu.

sebsauvage wrote on the 17 Mar 08 at 15:30
@Auzy: Yes, SMART will not replace a backup. But as you cannot force people to have a good backup procedures, Smart-notifier will be a life-saver.

Wouter.de.Groot wrote on the 17 Mar 08 at 23:27
The title is misleading, though. This could help to prevent data loss, but it would by no means be able to offer any kind of guarantee.
While I think this may be a good idea, it should not be touted as protection.

_sebastian_ wrote on the 18 Mar 08 at 02:23
this would not increase protection, but a warning message about you HDD state/condition could trigger the _last minute_ backup saving you from a HDD crash.

fordplay wrote on the 20 Mar 08 at 16:44
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/3343/

hgibson wrote on the 21 Mar 08 at 22:18
Badly needed. In six years of user support for Linux this is the most dramatic event to happen to a user. I made a policy of backing up the NFS mounted home folders to try to get around this. However I had to impose disk quota's (my backup server only has so much disk space). So I created a local folder for general storage. And guess what.. it's what was on the general folder that users put stuff and wanted it back after a disk failure.

In South Africa with power load shedding it is critical !


Post your comment