Ubuntu QA:
BlogBrainstormPackage status
Log in
Ubuntu QA
The Ubuntu community has contributed 12357 ideas, 58479 comments, 1187050 votes

Idea #4280: A program like microsoft encarta



up
-59
down
Written by dinca.marius.tinel the 11 Mar 08 at 20:02. Category: Education.
Related to: Nothing/Others. Status: New
Description
A program like microsoft encarta will be more than greeatful for ubuntu sow what do you say


Sorry for my bad english
Tags: (none)

Attachments
No attachments.


Duplicates


Comments
XSP wrote on the 11 Mar 08 at 20:26
There is one. It's called wikipedia.

Jerrac wrote on the 11 Mar 08 at 21:03
Does Microsoft even make that anymore? I haven't heard about it.

Anyway, while a non-internet based encyclopedia for linux could have it's uses, it is not a project a operating system company should work on. Maybe someone else could start a project seperately.

AndrewC wrote on the 11 Mar 08 at 22:29
There is a program somewhere which serves as a Wikipedia browser, if anything something like that should be included.

edcrypt wrote on the 14 Mar 08 at 17:31
XSP, you beat me to it...

Anyway, install Prism (aptitude install prism) and use wikipedia a desktop-app-like.

(Not sure if it is a good idea, maybe for edubuntu. BTW, OLPC came with wikipedia 1.0, IIRC)

himerx wrote on the 14 Mar 08 at 19:31
solo busca la wikipedia.

si lo necesitas en en tu maquina puedes descargarlo
.

bescritt wrote on the 17 Mar 08 at 23:39
To the above poster: please, post in a variety of English, as it is the preferred form of communication for international discussions (at least, until Esperanto takes hold).

bescritt wrote on the 17 Mar 08 at 23:45
The encyclopedia of choice for nearly any casual usage is Wikipedia.
< flame >
If you are going to parrot the popular idea "but Wikipedia is inaccurate because anybody can edit it", then maybe you should sit down at Wikipedia with a set of encyclopedias, and correct any blatant inaccuracies. Too lazy? Too hypocritical? Don't own a set of encyclopedias?
Tell me honestly, which provides more useful information? Wikipedia, or a set of encyclopedias that was likely printed much more than half a decade ago?


Post your comment