<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Create way to dispute "duplicate" flag on brainstorm]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/3795/</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Some ideas are apparently being flagged as duplicates when they are not. An example of this is idea #4 and idea #1399 which are NOT the same thing.   There needs to be a facility in Brainstorm to "appeal" a duplicate label.<br />
<br />


<b>[305 votes] Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #3795</b>
<br />

<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #2: Dispute any status fairly, but increase the number of neccesary approvals</b>
<br />

<br />
<br />



]]></description>

    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:35:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/3795/</guid>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from dan.fernandez</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Completely agree. Some people really act like this where a patent litigation: since I brote this first and sounds slightly similar, I mark it dupe.<br /><br />I just got one of my ideas (easy configuration of iSCSI server and client) marked as dupe yesterday, and I'm still trying to figure out what part of it is duplicated (the "original idea" was a tool to migrate config and files between computers).]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from cheesehead</title>
  <description><![CDATA[No, don't make a bureacracy out of it. We don't need a appeal process.<br /><br />Work within the non-duplicate thread to develop and post a blueprint for your idea. Don't sweat the other idea or the votes. Just work your idea.<br /><br />DON'T rant and rave about how you've been shafted. That's a quick way to lose respect from the community, and your ideas will suffer accordingly (it's not a merit contest, it's a popularity contest).<br /><br />DO glean good ideas and integrate them into yours. After all, you want your idea implemented, don't you?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from voxpelli</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I would say that instead of being able of appealing duplicates the duplicates should be merged with the original idea and as such not disappear but instead be consolidated into bigger blocks with a sensible level of detail.<br /><br />An idea can be of a very high level with almost no details or it can be a very low level and detailed one. Two ideas on a lower level plane can be "duplicates" of one another on a higher level even if they're not duplicates on the lower level.<br /><br />Consolidating ideas on a higher level makes Brainstorm more manageable and in the end would give each one of the merged ideas bigger attention.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from saivann</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I also think that we should do something to improve this. I often set ideas as duplicate and even if I take care to read very carefully, I feel uncomfortable that I can't know by any realistic way if people believe that what I did was wrong.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from treynolen</title>
  <description><![CDATA[The problem is that sometimes things get marked as duplicate even if they are not remotely similar.  I don't see a way to "work within the nonduplicate thread" when it isn't even close.<br /><br />Also, the default behavior of the brainstorm search keeps people from seeing the duplicate posts at all, so they fall by the wayside.  That is a good way to "lose" good ideas.<br /><br />Even if it doesn't get "appealed", maybe there could be a way for the community to vote on the duplicate flag itself. <br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from yman</title>
  <description><![CDATA[What if two CONFLICTING ideas are marked as duplicates? That's what happened to me. I'm totally for this idea.<br /><br />(The conflict isn't in technicalities, but in approach, goals, and proposed execution. Technically, they can both be implemented side-by-side)<br /><br />Further reference about my ideas the dopes marked as dupes:<br />Don't mark totally different ideas as duplicates - <br />http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/2840/<br /><br />Independent 3rd Party Repositories - <br />http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/1159/<br /><br />More attention paid to Commercial repo - <br />http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/69/]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from yman</title>
  <description><![CDATA[BTW, why was an older idea marked as a duplicate of this one?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from keen101</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Ironically my idea was flagged as a duplicate of this one. Although mine was technically created first. So, this one is technically the duplicate. :) the irony. <br /><br />http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/2276/<br /><br />+1 though. This has happened to me twice.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 06:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from ubuntu_demon</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I agree.<br /><br />these two are not duplicates :<br /><br />a security idea to make the homedir private (and create a special public readable dir for ease of use)<br />http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/5287/ <br /><br />about easy file sharing between local users<br />http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/3916/ ]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from dominik.mayer</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Using fingerprint reader in applications (http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/5937/) is now a duplicate of better fingerprint integration in GDM (http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/2/) and statements when voting against (!) an idea (http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/2129/) is a duplicate of only vote when you comment (http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/1102/). Why???]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from loonyphoenix</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I'm all for it! I've got an idea (6008) which encompasses THREE points I wanted to get across, yet it was marked as a duplicate of a very small idea which was PART of ONE of the points (4003). I'm prepared to give credit to 4003 for part of my idea because it came first, but not all of it! Where do I complain about this?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from loonyphoenix</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Er, mine is 6007. Sorry, typo.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from dustigroove</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Bug reported.<br />https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website/+bug/208883]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from nand</title>
  <description><![CDATA[We are currently thinking of reorganizing the duplicate process, via adding a new relationship between ideas : "related ideas".<br />But don't expect it too soon, the needed changes would be non-negligeable...]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 12:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from tebibyte</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Even if a potential duplicate is slightly off, in might be wise to consolidate anyway, because you could get a higher ranking out of it.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 03:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Auzy</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Tebibyte, theres many ideas here I have seen marked as dupe, where I dont agree with both sides of the dupe. <br /><br /><br />A little bit different can make all the difference in some cases. <br /><br />For eg, my network in a box idea, develop a way to have a self deploying network that sets itself up, and install all the relevent packages, on the different computers (as well as setting up ldap automatically, etc. That was marked dupe with "Ubuntu business server", which I dont agree with. <br /><br />One may argue the best way to implement this would be a seperate server, but I strongly believe Ubuntu server itself should be modular enough & integrated enough to include this capability on its CD<br />Whats important is if the implementation is the same. <br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 03:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Auzy</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Btw, I still vote +1 to this idea, as I stated in the merged ideas]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 03:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from steve196</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Example of wrong duplicates:<br />http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/1515/ <br />Examples in my own ideas (these are the only ones i easily find, because they are not blacked out for me by their duplicate status)<br />http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/8824/<br />http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/5386/<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Endolith</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Who is responsible for administering duplicates??  These two have absolutely nothing to do with each other:<br /><br />http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/12828/<br />Centralized server for looking up words in a dictionary?<br /><br />http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/13699/<br />Spell-checking, auto-correct, and grammar check should be available for all programs]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Auzy</title>
  <description><![CDATA[i just send wrong duplicates straight to the moderators list..]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 05:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Endolith</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Another example:<br /><br />Idea #91: Better Clipboard Management <br /><br />This idea is a duplicate of idea #3118: Fix copy / paste.<br /><br />But the latter is not really a duplicate of the former, and the latter was closed as a bug not an idea.  So now the former idea is closed??]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
      </channel>
</rss>
