31
votes
|
|
55
0
24
|
|
|
|
|
Propose your solution
Attachments
No attachments.
Duplicates
Comments
|
HoellP
wrote on the 4 Mar 08 at 21:12
|
|
|
I fear that bears the potential for problems, because very often the updateprocess needs interaction.
Of course you could pass the -y argument, but I think this is an insane idea especially when in combination with full-upgrade and a devel release. And I'm sure that will happen a lot.
So, unless the updateprocess is greatly changed from now, this method isn't very sensible.
cheers.
|
|
|
I don't think about this problem and the "-y" argument is not the solution for sure...
You are right.
But I don't think to use these "feature"for full-upgrade/dist-upgrade but only for simple update.
Thanks you for your comment!
|
|
Ssdg
wrote on the 4 Mar 08 at 23:55
|
|
|
Hum, except for some kernel updates or Xorg updates, you don't even have to log out to use the updated version, just to quit and re-launch.
So, why do you think you should do it at shutdown time?
|
|
jespdj
wrote on the 7 Mar 08 at 15:09
|
|
|
Windows XP and Vista work like this: updates are automatically downloaded in the background, and when you switch off your computer the updates are installed right before the computer switches off.
It would be a nice feature, but I see one problem: Installing updates in Ubuntu requires you to type your password (because administrator privileges are required to install the updates). When / where would you type this in? Should it work like this: Click Shutdown, you get a message "There are updates, enter your password", updates are installed and computer shuts down.
|
|
|
Yes Xp and Vista works the same and I think it's a good approach for a desktop system.
For the password , yes you have to insert again before shutdown in the exactly way as you said.
|
|
ugm6hr
wrote on the 9 Mar 08 at 11:57
|
|
|
|
Perhaps just allow the user to Shutdown while Update Manager is running; this should delay shutdown until Updates are completed automatically.
|
|
|
i agree with hoellp that this is probably not a good feature to have.
if we were to have it, however, there should be a check box "install updates first", so the user can check that and select whatever action (logoff, suspend, hibernate, etc.)
|
|
neomenlo
wrote on the 25 Mar 08 at 00:06
|
|
|
I dont really see the benefit of this. I've never really encountered a problem with stability after an update. So the reason must be for performance. Maybe updates should be more backgrounded instead of this?
Maybe even run on screen lock?
|
|
Lee-Pro
wrote on the 28 Mar 08 at 10:52
|
|
|
|
I'd say that it would be very annoying if I had my desktop start installing when shutting down. I would rather install it in my own time. Also, in the update configuration, there is already the option to automatically install updates in the background.
|
|
zbynek
wrote on the 16 Jun 08 at 19:40
|
|
|
Adding checkbox "Turn computer off when finished" in update status/progress dialog can be easily done. And it solve problem from my point of view.
|
|
oyejorge
wrote on the 17 Jul 08 at 07:52
|
|
|
I was thinking of zbynek's idea myself:
"Turn computer off when finished" option for the update dialog.
|
Post your comment
|
