<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Enable OpenID/Google,Facebook,Yahoo...  for GDM/KDM login manager]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/3079/</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Auth against any of the OpenID/Yahoo/Google/Facebook/Twitter/Meemi... into your local login manager (when network is available otherwise use the classical mapped local login user).<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
<br />


<b>[-34 votes] Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #3079</b>
<br />

<br />
<br />



]]></description>

    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:02:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/3079/</guid>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Morpheus90</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I don't think this is a great idea. At least, not now.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from comi</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Too much "web 2.0" with all the security issues (OpenID).]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from LucaCappelletti</title>
  <description><![CDATA[:) thanks for your comments]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from aw@kreawit.se</title>
  <description><![CDATA[An OpenID pam-module, sound good in my ears. There is a Google Summer of code for this. A poor-mans AD/LDAP.<br /><br />If OpenID is secure enough for webapplications, why is it not secure for local PCs?<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> ]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 00:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from wolfwitch</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Turn over the security of a computer to a Web-based security model? I'm sure the guys at Black Hat and Defcon would LOVE it if that happened.<br /><br />This would also necessitate having two different user accounts- one local and one OpenID just to deal with fallback if there is no net access. If you have to have a local account anyway- what's the point of using OpenID?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from paven</title>
  <description><![CDATA[atleast openID would be usefule for school or even more usefull for liberies! +1]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 04:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Brunni</title>
  <description><![CDATA[This would be interesting for schools and companys. Especially if they are using e.g. Google Apps.<br /><br />Would be great to have.<br /><br />Solution could be, that a small browser-window is opened before the login is made.<br />Because: OpenID means that only the ID-Provider sees your password.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
      </channel>
</rss>
