<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[bigmem kernel]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/2828/</link>
    <description><![CDATA[In Debian, you have to option to install a -bigmem kernel, which supports more than 3.2GB RAM which does the default kernel.<br />32-bit users with 4GB Ram are now skipped, and these users can then profit from all their valuable RAM chips.<br /><br />If Ubuntu would provide such a kernel, they would cover the upcoming big memory workstations and laptops.<br />
<br />


<b>[117 votes] Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #2828</b>
<br />

<br />
<br />



]]></description>

    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:43:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/2828/</guid>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from exactopposite</title>
  <description><![CDATA[what's wrong with using 64bit?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from kernelOfTruth</title>
  <description><![CDATA[semi-working flash-support and several other stuff which doesn't work 100% ;)<br /><br />btw, fedora is also offering PAE-kenrels :)]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from sparc128</title>
  <description><![CDATA[What do you mean by semi-working flash?  I am getting good experience with flash under Firefox 3 under 8.04 but I have not done a lot of testing.  ]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from carlinuxlearner</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Flash works flawless here. Ubuntu 7.10 64bit.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from thecheatah</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I just recently built a 4gb computer and installed ubuntu. You just have to install the "server" kernel.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from zooounds</title>
  <description><![CDATA[With server kernel you lose restricted modules]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from exactopposite</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Flash is working just fine in 64 bit gutsy. It's in the repos, and it installs in synaptic jsut like it does in 32 bit gutsy. I'm not sure why people are under the impression the 64 bit has such problems. ]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 05:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from zooounds</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Does it work running 32 bit window apps in wine on 64 bit ubuntu?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from andydread</title>
  <description><![CDATA[There are many reasons why we still need 32bit.  <br />Flaky flash.    <br />Skype<br />32bit windows apps in wine anyone?  <br />i'm sure there is more.  others can add to this list. <br /><br />I mean come on. Why are they refusing to provide something that was there in the past?  I breezy I could <br />apt-get install linux-image-bigmem.  I can still do that in the latest Debian.  So somewhere along the line some brilliant person made the decision to remove it.   <br /><br />To force people to got to 64bit just to get their computer to recognize +3GB of ram is ridiculous.  What about people running 32bit already and upbraded their ram? do they have to reload the whole OS?  or can one just apt-get intall linux-image-x64 ? then have all their ram recongnized?  <br />I think the assumption that people should reload their PCs to 64 bit then wrestle with all the ills that may come along with that is shortsighted.   ]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from syberghost</title>
  <description><![CDATA[This is a frequent question on the forums, in Answers, on IRC, etc.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from hoc</title>
  <description><![CDATA[4GB or more is not uncommon in desktop and laptops these days. As a matter of fact, the reason i hear the most for people not buying 4GB is that the OS doesn't support it! It's not that people don't want to have 4GB+ RAM!<br /><br />Why not supply a separate package for the 32bit version with the options supporting 64GB Highmem enabled? I ask this question seriously, which good reasons exist for not enabling this while it is perfectely possible? Other linux-distro's can do it, heck, even debian does. (And before you say i am free to choose another distro, i like Ubuntu and would like to stick to it. ;) )<br /><br />And as an added benefit, supporting more than 4GB would provide 1 more argument to upgrade from another OS to Ubuntu.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from cdenley</title>
  <description><![CDATA["With server kernel you lose restricted modules"<br /><br />No, you just lose the dependency on it. The server kernel can use restricted modules.<br /><br />dpkg-query -W linux-restricted*server]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
      </channel>
</rss>
