<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Mono is not a need]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/20729/</link>
    <description><![CDATA[The problem with mono is that, it's not a need, besides, is based in a proprietary framework. That means mono development depends on that company's framework development. So, why bother if we already can make multi-platform programs other ways? <br />
<br />


<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Replace Mono-driven apps</b>
<br />

<br />
<br />



]]></description>

    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:58:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/20729/</guid>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from ryanli</title>
  <description><![CDATA[The current problem is that there're no better substitutions.<br /><br />Gnote is simply a port; in Gnome, there're no applications that have more functions than F-spot; rhythmbox is the current default, but may suspend its development; the others you mentioned aren't used widely.<br /><br />I also dislike Mono apps, and have them all removed. Also I think that removing them all will benefit development in other `good' languages. But what's contradictory, is that I mentioned, there're no better solutions in other languages.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from viraptor</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Can we all please leave it alone already? ideas# 110, 20199, 20121, 20473, 20709, 20257, 15728...<br />Also: http://lwn.net/Articles/284760/<br /><br />That horse is dead. Please stop beating it.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
      </channel>
</rss>

