<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Simultaneously download and install with Update Manager]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/1931/</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Currently you can spend ten minutes downloading updates followed by ten minutes installing them.<br /><br />Update Manager should analyse the dependencies in packages which need updating and download the packages with no dependencies first (that is no dependencies on packages which themselves need updating), followed by files which only depended on the first package downloaded etc.<br /><br />This will allow updates to be installed in parallel - as soon as the first package is downloaded it can be installed.<br /><br />
<br />


<b>[1028 votes] Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #1931</b>
<br />

<br />
<br />



]]></description>

    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 01:38:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/1931/</guid>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from booljayj</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Interesting insight, could yield some interesting results.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from cheesehead</title>
  <description><![CDATA[The current method is simple and protects your system.<br /><br />Haste and impatience during an installation are great reasons to hose your system. Schedule it for down time instead (lunch is a nice time to let the machine churn).<br /><br />Change nothing about install/update without good reason.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from ethana2</title>
  <description><![CDATA[That's good reason.  If your machine dies in the middle of applying updates, it gets screwed anyway.<br /><br />...and it fixes itself with a line of text.<br /><br />yes.  voted up.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from preben4</title>
  <description><![CDATA[This would make large updates, like the first when you install ubuntu, go much faster. slow computers spend more time intalling than downloading, this could help at least 40% of the installing time.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from eld1e6o</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Good idea.<br /><br />I had the same idea.<br /><br />+1<br /><br />Greetings!]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from grahamatubuntu</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Related to idea #10965]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 08:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from mlissner</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I imagine this would lead to disk hashing, though it could still be faster this way.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 07:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from cheesehead</title>
  <description><![CDATA[You can also simply renice the upgrades to a lower priority and move it all to the background.<br /><br />nice -n 15 update-manager<br /><br />Then who cares how long it takes? Start it after you boot and let it chug for 20 minutes invisibly and undetectably while you work on something else.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 13:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Olberd</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Would love this time saver.<br /><br />Apart from the dependency issue, packages that affect the network connectivity should also be marked as so, and not installed until all packages have been downloaded.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from L4Linux</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I believe it too risky. People won't be so impressed if 400 updates are done 10 minutes faster, but they will be furious and erase Ubuntu if an update breaks their system.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 10:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Ahdistunut Antilooppi</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Many possibilities to f-up, but huge speedup on slow systems behind slow internet connections. <br />Diskspace needed for upgrade can also be reduced if installed packages are deleted. <br />As an option yes, not as default.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from SoftwareExplorer</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I had this same Idea. as long as the computer downloads and then installs the dependencies first it would work great. I don't get how this would be dangerous at all if Ubuntu is still paying attention to required dependencies. I think this should also be implemented for apt-get, synaptic, and Add/Remove programs too. +1!]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 01:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
      </channel>
</rss>
