I'm an artist and I'd really like to help with some of the Ubuntu art projects, problem is I had to visit around 3 different sites clicking on some 8 different links to get there and then I had to subscribe to a mailing list
As an Industrial Designer wanting to help, I faced the same problem. I agree with you. I think Ubuntu is probably losing very good design concepts due to the lack of accessibility. I personally tried twice to participate by communicating my desire to help, but nobody paid attention.
Helping with anything in open source is not accessible. There are five million hoops to jump through just to get a spelling error fixed in an application.
Where did I say it was good? :) I'm saying that this applies to much more than just art. Anyone who wants to contribute to any part of open source has to do a lot of work just in preparation. We need to lower the barriers.
Oops, right you are. You never said it was a good thing, I should really read comments before I start my little rants =D
Yes, absolutely. My mom is a programmer, but she's very impatient and wants things to work right away or else she'll lose interest. Every time I think "is this accessible enough?" I ask myself whether my mom would bother with it
@ KhaaL
Oh that's a very good idea! Keeping everything related to Ubuntu at the same place and making it easy to improve..
I'm sure that it would pay off in a few months.
I just want to add that when I say "issue commands" I was talking about telling the participant what is needed.
If we go back to KhaaL's idea then think of it this way; Launchpad has a 'to-do' list of strings that need to be translated for every language and a 'to-do' list of bugs that need to be fixed- I would like to see Launchpad store a list of artwork (icons, wallpapers, logos etc.) that need to be drawn and it is imperative that suggesting ideas be as easy as translating or submitting bug reports to Launchpad!
The problem with exporting to GnomeLook is that Gnome look will eventually contain alot of semi finished uncompleted looks...
The purpose of exporting and importing is to be able to backup ur look and restore it later...or maybe simply sharing it with friends...
The problem with exporting to GnomeLook is that Gnome look will eventually contain alot of semi finished uncompleted looks...
That wouldn't be so bad if there were a way for each to be part of a revision tree. Like you take the default Human theme and modify it, and it shows up as a variant of Human, then someone else modifies yours, and it shows up in the tree below that...
There could be voting on which variants are high quality to separate the good from the bad, etc.
Probably not something GnomeLook is capable of, though. Maybe it needs a new website specifically for this.
@ Endolith
That is actually a good idea!
It might be a little difficult to implement but other than that it sounds, then if one theme e.g. has a lot of branches you can tell that it must be a pretty good theme (just like Ubuntu has around 20-30 branches so there must be something people like about it)
then if one theme e.g. has a lot of branches you can tell that it must be a pretty good theme
Maybe. :) Really, it would just show that lots of people have it. Obviously Human would have tons of branches since it's the default, for instance. My idea was that this would:
1. Reduce the number of themes you have to look through. They'd all be "variants" of a base theme, so there would just be a list of base themes to navigate through, instead of a list of thousands of themes that only vary slightly from each other.
2. Show relationships between themes, instead of just arbitrary rankings. So if everyone likes theme A, but then someone makes an improved version theme B, and everyone who downloads B likes it better than A, then the site should show this somehow. It should hide A and only display B as an updated version of A.
Like on Slashdot, there are huge discussion threads with many branches, and they use an algorithm to only display the best comments and hide the rest. If you're interested in a certain comment that you see in this "wide" view, you can then drill down and view the discussion surrounding it that was previously hidden.
Similarly, if you like a certain theme, you can drill down and view others that are related to it.
I'm just trying to think of a way to separate the good from the bad.