<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[End-of-Life? Update manager should show EoL status and provide more info]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/17489/</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Subject: When a release reaches End-of-Life, update manager should show EoL status and provide a link with working procedures and more information.<br /><br />Severity: wishlist<br />Related to: Bug #1, update-manager, ubuntu documentation<br /><br />Description:<br />Supposedly a release reaches its End-of-Life (EoL). In that case repositories simply disappear, just as they have with 7.04 Feisty, see: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/feisty/<br />The old releases archives and installation files are transferred to http://old-releases.ubuntu.com<br />Yet, a simple user, that has just installed the world of Internet. They have installed an Ubuntu release before and were using it offline, and the release is not supported anymore.<br />The update-manager prompts the user with the choice to upgrade to a newer release and, due to these changes, they can't.<br /><br />Scenario:<br />- A granny has been using a computer with Ubuntu installed.<br />- The same granny recently decided to get connected to the internet, but she was using an Ubuntu distribution that has reached its EoL.<br />- She connects to the internet, says "OK, let's see some Internet-related applications".<br />- She discovers System > Administration > Update Manager. "Oh let's try it and see if there's anything new of games for my grandchildren"<br />- She checks for updates and notices the new release upgrade. "A new version of Ubuntu, how nice, let's download it then!"<br />- She can't upgrade because the repository or repositories are missing and cannot be found. The notification for new release upgrade is still available though. "Oh great, now what do I do?"<br /><br />Problem:<br />This gives out a broken upgrade plan to the user who gets confused.<br />A normal desktop user does not read mailing lists or could be completely tech-agnostic, a person that doesn't know how to connect to the Internet Relay Chat (IRC) and find a solution to their problems. I realise that these releases are unsupported and "are supposed to be broken" as many of you think - I'm *not* asking to support with security updates nor to provide new packages for old releases.<br /><br />Tested and reproduced on:<br />Ubuntu 6.10 edgy (upgrade to 7.10 through update-manager)<br />Ubuntu 7.04 feisty (upgrade to 7.10 through update-manager)<br />Ubuntu 7.04 feisty (upgrade to 7.10 with alternate CD)<br /><br />Note:<br />Upgrades with alternate CD *work* if you choose "No" to the question "Include latest updates from the Internet".<br />This step could be included in the documentation.<br /><br />Expectations:<br />I simply wish that the users, who eventually end up using the internet on an old unsupported release, get notified about that. They should be given *at least* a link which they could simply click to find out more information.<br />
<br />


<b>[125 votes] Solution #1: Update manager - show EoL status with link to upgrades help documentation</b>
<br />

<br />
<br />



]]></description>

    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:45:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/17489/</guid>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Primož Papič</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Sorry you lost me at the granny example.<br />I don't like all this let's get a computer for my granny and install Ubuntu on it. I think that's "torture". Poor granny doesn't know how to use computer let alone knows how to repair X server when it gets broken due to updates...<br /><br />I get what your trying to say, but I just can't imagine that.<br />I personally like to be on a bleeding edge and I believe that most users do the same.<br />But still +1, for those that might be more conservative...]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from medigeek</title>
  <description><![CDATA[The point is that a service is provided, but cannot be used.<br />Would you rather prefer an example with a 12-year-old child? Either way, I wanted to point an extreme case, where common people aren't so "techie".<br /><br />And my server wasn't broken, I tried upgrading from old releases using the alternate CD and everything was ok. Plus, nowadays exists "bullet proof X" or something like that, which makes it much more stable to fall to safe-mode settings and still get your desktop back.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Robster</title>
  <description><![CDATA[It would also be nice if the updates system could give the user a notification when the version they are using reaches end of life with options as to what actions they wish to take eg upgrade.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from medigeek</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I have opened a wishlist bug for this:<br />https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/319146<br /><br />mvo (Michael Vogt) said that update-manager has already the background support for end-of-life messages, we'll see how it goes.<br /><br />Feel free to comment there! :)]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from GiveLove</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Yes!!!!<br /><br />medigeek,<br /><br />I understand exactly what you are suggesting. And it is exactly what I've been questioning in the Ubuntu forums as to whether this feature exists.<br /><br />http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1394262<br /><br />This is a very important idea to add to Ubuntu. <br /><br />Primoz,<br />You've missed the whole point. Do you think it would be any less torture to put a non-computer literate granny on a Windows desktop OS? I think that would be way worse. Which is exactly the reason I'm in the process of trying to convert the friends and family I support to Ubuntu. As most of these people are unable to update and maintain their Windows OS and apps. It's far to complicated compared to Ubuntu Linux. And end up leaving themselves far more open to software exploits by not having a constantly updated OS and apps.<br /><br />I think you have made a poor judgment by grouping everyone into what you like to do. I personally do not like bleeding edge, as I want a stable OS and apps that I do not have to constantly trawl the Ubuntu forums for fixes. Does that mean that everyone does as I do? No, of course not. Ubuntu is supposed to be an easy distribution to use. Not arcane and obfuscated.  <br /><br /><br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
      </channel>
</rss>

