<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org 3 On Ubuntu 9.04 (Jaunty Jackalope)]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16659/</link>
    <description><![CDATA[One thing that surprised me once I was testing the alpha 2 of Ubuntu 9.04, was that it included OpenOffice.org 2.4 - What?!?! It's an alpha! it should be bleeding edge and include the latest software! (correction: yeah, alpha is not about bleeding edge software, it's about bleeding edge OS)<br />Even sister (daughter?) distros like <a href="http://www.hacktolive.org/su">Super Ubuntu</a> and so already include it!<br /><br />I really hope we get OO.org 3 in the final version!<br />
<br />


<b>[477 votes] Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #16659</b>
<br />

<br />
<br />



]]></description>

    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 03:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 06:47:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/16659/</guid>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from eckstasy</title>
  <description><![CDATA[obviously they'll fix this when the official release comes up.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from borsook</title>
  <description><![CDATA[There is no reason why you shouldn't be using OO3 on 8.10 now, so I'm sure devs will manage to add it to 9.04 ;)]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from rouge568</title>
  <description><![CDATA[OO3 will be in the 9.04 release by default.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from zooounds</title>
  <description><![CDATA[alpha != bleeding edge.<br /><br />It's a testing version of the version to be released.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from borsook</title>
  <description><![CDATA[@Emacs23 I see that you're still defending your title of the most immature poster here. First of all 3.0 will replace 2.4, that's sure. Secondly name one thing that's wrong with 3.0 as opposed to 2.4. I've been using OO 3 for over a month and never met with any stability problems.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Craig73</title>
  <description><![CDATA[It's been stated many times that when 3.0.1 (3.1?) comes out it will be added to the repositories... likely it is not in the alpha because they haven't spent time doing any packaging yet (which doesn't seem unreasonable)]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Emacs23</title>
  <description><![CDATA[But I insist we need to replace this crap with software that respects system approach to gui. Even m$ in their m$ office for mac respects mac HIG, but this shit doesn't - it uses crappy windows UI for all systems.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from yaknowwat</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Emacs23 i hope you realize odf is a actual true standard format used by more than OpenOffice even KOffice Google and an array of other places support it.<br /><br />While OpenOffice does use the same interface throughout the layout it simple enough to understand no use rearraging the everyday accessed tools for a different platform of the same program.  Though i do agree OpenOffice does needa new interface.<br /><br />Anyways back to topic.  Hopeing for OpenOffice 3.0.1 in Jaunty or OxygenOffice 3.0 ( based off Go-OO which is an improved OpenOffice, in terms of features. )]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from nandersson</title>
  <description><![CDATA[This is a no brainer<br /><br />+1]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from sisto</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Already in Jaunty.<br />https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/jaunty-openoffice]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from ubunturules246865</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Remember that it's an alpha.  But if the final version of 9.04 still doesn't have it, something's wrong.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from borsook</title>
  <description><![CDATA[@ubunturules246865 - but that's the point! It should be in alpha. OO 3 did not make it into 8.10 with the silly excuse that it's not tested enough. So when they're going to test it if it's not provided in the test release? I know that OO 3 is used widely outside Ubuntu test versions, but since OO is so important for Ubuntu and we have people willing to test 9.04 alpha, they could at the same time test OO 3...]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from ushimitsudoki</title>
  <description><![CDATA[As long as it the *real* OpenOffice.org? +1<br /><br />Forked versions like go-oo? No thank you.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 02:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Ubuwu</title>
  <description><![CDATA[OO 3 is ready to be included in jaunty, but there are still some dependencies that need to be fixed. This will be done soon.<br /><br />See: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/jaunty-openoffice]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from benjamimgois</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Why don't use the 3.1 version ? It'll be ready in April 9 according openoffice wiki.<br /><br />http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOoRelease31]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
      </channel>
</rss>
