<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[important packages should not dissapear easily]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16117/</link>
    <description><![CDATA[I'm very concerned with all the effort spent on packaging a project, and got scared on how easily a so useful project like khexedit, with no similar available, disappearing so fast and easily and without any explanation or a better replacement.<br /><br />as you can check from http://packages.ubuntu.com, khexedit can be found in the Hardy repository, but not anymore in the Intrepid and Jaunty - hugelly scarry, isn't it? =(<br /><br />just check:<br />http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/khexedit<br /><br />and be surprised with:<br />http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/khexedit<br />http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/khexedit<br /><br />My concern is this can destroy all the passion, enthusiasm and effort spent on whole open-source development - i think it's very, very serious.<br />
<br />


<b>[30 votes] Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #16117</b>
<br />

<br />
<br />



]]></description>

    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:32:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/16117/</guid>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Matthias</title>
  <description><![CDATA[displayconfig-gtk, an really-really important tool for me, disappeared to. If software vanishes in the repository, a short explanation would be great!]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from cheesehead</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Short explanations are already included in the changelog of each update, as well as the changelog of each package.<br /><br />If you find a change without a changelog entry, you can do a great service to the community by tracking down the missing information and then file a bug against that package.<br /><br />In the case of khexedit, see http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2008-March/001848.html . It was replaced by okteta.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from nitrofurano</title>
  <description><![CDATA[and how can these packages like displayconfig-gtk and khexedit reappear in the actual repositories? i'm affraid there are tons of very useful packages being vanished on our back constantly...<br /><br />maybe a new repository category is needed, besides main, multiverse, universe and restricted - a category named 'vanished'...]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from cheesehead</title>
  <description><![CDATA[The short answer is to go to packages.debian.org and get the latest/final release .deb...and save it, because Debian also eventually dumps orphaned packages.<br /><br />So I don't see the point of expending effort to package and test orphans and triage their bugs, since nobody upstream is going to fix the problems that are found - that's why they are orphans.<br /><br />Of course, any community member willing to put in the time and love can adopt most orphans - or fork their beloved khexedit and create a PPA.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from papukaija</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Ubuntu follows Debian´s packaging policy, but still I vote +1.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
      </channel>
</rss>
