<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Ask to copy file instead if permissions doesn't allow for moving when d'n'd]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16108/</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Ask to copy files instead, if the user tries to drag and drop a file that is looked for some reason and couldn't be moved.<br />
<br />


<b>[105 votes] Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #16108</b>
<br />

<br />
<br />



]]></description>

    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:56:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/16108/</guid>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from tutonien</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I believe this one is the same<br /><br />http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/6790/]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Emacs23</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I believe this idea is very same with all bullshit proposed here for a couple of month, and should be declained in the same way.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from andruk</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Please try to stay constructive and family-friendly Emacs23.<br /><br />I think this is a different idea than 6790.  6790 is suggesting that we essentially launch gksudo if the user doesn't have rights to do something they tried to do (drag a picture into /usr/share/icons, for example).<br /><br />This idea seems to be to offer to copy something instead of moving something (for instance, *moving* an icons from /usr/share/icons isn't allowed, but *copying* /usr/share/icons is allowed).<br /><br />It seems to me the best way to do this all would to simply have a warning/error dialog with options like "Copy Files", "Authorize", and "Cancel".<br /><br />+!]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Eldmannen</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Sounds intuitive and friendly. :)<br />+1]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Quixotic</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I like andruk's point of view... authorize being like the "unlock" button with the key symbol from Network Settings when trying to manually config.<br /><br />just thinking we should continue using the same terms.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from soliac</title>
  <description><![CDATA[In this situation the drag-n-drop action should be copy ('plus' icon, +, beside cursor). The 'move' action in this context (read-only file) is not correct. It is not possible to move files you don't have permission to move. However, if the user had sudo rights, it would be good to allow them some way to move such files, as per: http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/6790/]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from pepperpupper</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Idea #6790 is about moving files into protected folders while mine was about asking to copy instead of moving if moving is not possible. ]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from pepperpupper</title>
  <description><![CDATA[due to a looked original]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
      </channel>
</rss>
