Written by longlivethebestos the 30 Oct 08 at 20:13.
Category: Usability.
Related project:
Nothing/Others.
Status: New
Rationale
Currently in 8.10 if I want to change my screen resolution I
have to go to System--->Preferences and if I want to change my background I have to go to the Desktop and Right-click it, Logically you would think that Resolution and screen saver would be in the same place as desktop background, themes and visual effects. So what I'm saying is that when you right click the Desktop there should be an option saying 'Customize Desktop' which have these options when opened ; Theme, Background, Font, Interface, Visual effects, Screen saver and Resolution.
Perhaps kcontrol should be returned. I liked the idea of all customization being done in one place, kcontrol allowed this but someone took kcontrol out of kde starting with kde4. This was, in my opinion, a move in the wrong direction.
"Currently in 8.10 if I want to change my screen resolution I
have to go to System--->Preferences and if I want to change my background I have to go to the Desktop and Right-click it, Logically you would think that Resolution and screen saver would be in the same place as desktop backgroun"
Heck no?
Since when is resolution a customization thing?
I think it is much better the current way, easier to find the "change resolution icon" than to guess it is in the same place as background.
I agree with the comment above. Resolution has nothing to do with customization. It is the hardware-related setting. And who cares if Windows has this implemented in this stupid way?
Screensaver should be included there, I agree with that. But big NO for resolution.
I don't like the idea. It'll confuse people. Let's see... "Oh, I want to change my screen resolution. Where do I go? Oh my goodness! It's not here! I'll just click on all the options till I find it!" *5 hours later* "Oh, here it is! It's inside the Customize Desktop option!"
I suggest we'd change it to a window or something where we can have the different options grouped, a bit like the "show in groups" function of Windows XP. That way, we can have the best of both worlds.