<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Must Change the name]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/1492/</link>
    <description><![CDATA[They might add GNU/Linux to the name, example:<br /><br />Ubuntu GNU/Linux.<br /><br />Sometimes Cononical refers to Ubuntu as Ubuntu Linux, and other people more...<br /><br />Linux is only the kernel of the OS, the complete OS is named GNU/Linux.<br /><br />Ubuntu as son of Debian GNU/Linux, must use GNU/Linux in its name.<br /><br />It's GNU/Linux, dammit....<br />
<br />


<b>[-304 votes] Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #1492</b>
<br />

<br />
<br />



]]></description>

    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:01:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/1492/</guid>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from frandavid100</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Ubuntu is neat and easy to remember.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Eldmannen</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Ubuntu is based on Debian, and Debian is called Debian GNU/Linux.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from johimself</title>
  <description><![CDATA["Ubuntu" is nice and simple, adding TLAs and "geeky" things like "Linux", "Unix" etc make it more intimidating for the it novices.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from skyhook19</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I agree, we don't need to add anything to the name Ubuntu to try to make it sound geekier. ]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from inselaffe</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Thinks like this are what makes a lot of people not give Linux in general a second glance. What next - change the startup sound to an demonstration of how to pronounce Linux as "Linnux"?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from superkoop</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Ubuntu GNU/Linux = too long.<br /><br />Ubuntu = perfect length.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from dan.fernandez</title>
  <description><![CDATA[First idea i'm modding down here...<br /><br />There are lots of other distros (both commertial and community mantained) that doesn't stick the "GNU/Linux" in the middle of the name. It's too long, it's counter-intuitive, and it's hard to pronounce. Ubuntu should keep it simple on that issue.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from ebrahim</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Not 'Ubuntu GNU/Linux' and **never** 'Ubuntu Linux'.<br />A simple 'Ubuntu' is the best name.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Remmy</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Actually, it's the GNU project that thinks it should be called GNU/Linux. Who made them the boss of what we want to call it?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from yaroman86</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I don't like it. I still think the idea of "GNU/Linux" as opposed to just "Linux" is merely RMS trying to steal credit from Torvalds. Lets just stick with "Ubuntu."]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from AndrewC</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Wow, I didn't know Richard Stallman had an account here!]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from racoon97</title>
  <description><![CDATA[kyubi, it's a very bad idea. Ubuntu is the best name. GNU/Linux ? Very funny. Seriously, his name is Ubuntu, not GNU/linux : simple and easy to pronounce for everyone.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 07:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from probono</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Ubuntu happens to use Linux and some GNU components. So what? It also happens to use GNOME, GIMP and whatnot. If you added all of those to the name, you would end up with a book instead of a name ;-)]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 17:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Bram S</title>
  <description><![CDATA[kyubi (or should i say Richard?), Ubuntu is popular due to its non-geekyness. Now do you really wanna take that away from it?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from deadowl</title>
  <description><![CDATA[If I accidentally said Linux instead of GNU/Linux in front of Richard Stallman, I would run for the hills.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 19:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Zugol</title>
  <description><![CDATA[When I introduce myself I use my own name. I don't tell people I'm homo-sapience-sapience. Did you ?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from tromboneman</title>
  <description><![CDATA[FYI: Richard Stallman did way more work on the GNU/Linux OS than Torvalds did.  Even according to Torvalds, "I'm basically a very lazy person who likes to get credit for things other people actually do."  Torvalds is the social engineer, and Stallman is the programming genius.  Torvalds knows how to get people to do what he wants and contribute to his software.  Stallman on the other hand, doesn't really understand that piece.  Stallman is the programmer and philosopher, and Torvalds is the figurehead. Period.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from EinKinder</title>
  <description><![CDATA[<br /><br />FYI: Richard Stallman did way more work on the GNU/Linux OS than Torvalds did. Even according to Torvalds, "I'm basically a very lazy person who likes to get credit for things other people actually do." Torvalds is the social engineer, and Stallman is the programming genius. Torvalds knows how to get people to do what he wants and contribute to his software. Stallman on the other hand, doesn't really understand that piece. Stallman is the programmer and philosopher, and Torvalds is the figurehead. Period. <br /><br /><br /><br />This is by no mean the place the place for that kind of debate. Brainstorm is meant to be used for productive and constructive purposes, neither of which are served by you comment.<br /><br />As for the idea, voted down for irrelevance. Sorry.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Remco</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Why not call it Ubuntu/Debian/Apt/Gnome/Gnu/Linux?]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from tromboneman</title>
  <description><![CDATA[@EinKinder - This is just awful!  By voting +1, you are saying you support Richard Stallman and the FSF, and that you use Ubuntu GNU/Linux for the freedom.  By voting -1, you are saying that you only use "Linux" because it fits your temporary practical needs.<br /><br />Saying GNU preserves the freedom!<br /><br />"When I [have people call it GNU/Linux], some people think that it's because I want my ego to be fed, right? Of course, I'm not asking you to call it 'Stallmanix'!"<br />     -Stallman]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from gcc</title>
  <description><![CDATA[I agree with this idea... I think the name of the distro should be Ubuntu (it's shorter, OK), but in the stickers that canonical sends it whould say Ubuntu GNU/Linux for human beings.<br /><br />GNU is the OS, linux it's just a kernel... I don't use Linux, I use GNU ;)]]></description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from tbrminsanity</title>
  <description><![CDATA[From a marketing point of view it is better to just call it Ubuntu and say it is a Linux or GNU/Linux OS.  <br /><br />Please don't confuse the non-users, they don't know better.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from mrkennie</title>
  <description><![CDATA[God forbid anyone calling it Ubuntu GNU and leaving out the Linux part eh? +1 for GNU/Linux, credit where credit's due IMO.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 11:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from mrkennie</title>
  <description><![CDATA[God forbid anyone calling it Ubuntu GNU and leaving out the Linux part eh? +1 for GNU/Linux, credit where credit's due IMO.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 11:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from mrkennie</title>
  <description><![CDATA[God forbid anyone calling it Ubuntu GNU and leaving out the Linux part eh? +1 for GNU/Linux, credit where credit's due IMO.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 11:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from probono</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Both Linux and the GNU components are just tiny fractions of the overall codebase of upstream projects that go into Ubuntu. Future versions of Ubunu might also run with other kernels and other compilers. So neither Linux nor GNU should be added to the Ubuntu brand.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 12:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
        <item>
  <title>Comment from Clorox</title>
  <description><![CDATA[Why does everyone keep saying "Ubuntu GNU/Linux" is too long? Debian is officially "Debian GNU/Linux", but everyone calls it Debian. I don't see a problem with that.]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
      </channel>
</rss>
