http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12662/
Since we talk about standards so much, we must realize that a standard way of handling common data would be a wonderful benefit for users. It would require disparate developers to all get on board to come up with and implement a standard for such a thing, but imagine the possibilities of it: A user can seamlessly go between using Thunderbird's address book and Evolution's address book, for instance. And another app, say, a CRM app for example, can add a new contact to the mix, making it available for all apps that can also connect to the service, including Thunderbird and Evolution.

The system would need to be extensible as well, such that in the case that you had a contact with data that the service didn't recognize, you can still store your data there and use it. Or, I suppose, if other apps implement the same extension handler they could use it as well. But the point is that all of the common, consistent data is in tact, and the extended data degrades gracefully.

Think about it, we have efforts today such as the Data Portability movement and Weave intending to make precious user data portable on the web, why can't we have the same kind of movement on the open desktop? Canonical could sponsor an idea like this to the Linux Standards Base. It would take time, but it could happen.

[46 votes] Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #12662


]]> en-us Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:56:36 +0000 Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:34:31 +0000 QAPoll module http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/12662/ Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:26:28 +0000 Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:33:37 +0000 http://mugshot.org/
http://live.gnome.org/OnlineDesktop
http://www.conduit-project.org/]]> Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:38:49 +0000 Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:34:30 +0000