Contributor forteller on the Graphics category
Better monitor support and configuration tools
Written by No0ne the 29 Feb 08 at 00:37.
Global category: Graphics.
Implemented
Better way to set monitor resolution and refresh rate. Majority of the new monitors are LCD type. User should be able to specify the native resolution and refresh rate during install.
Then Ubuntu/X must do WHATEVER it takes to stick to that resolution and refresh rate.
In case of multi-monitor setups, must be able to specify the configuration at time of installation.
Also, the login GUI must use same resolution as X. Why different resolutions?
Rant:
I have nVidia NVS440 card with Viewsonic VP2290b monitor. Video card must be set to 1920x1200 @13Hz or @41Hz refresh rate for each of it's four outputs. Desktop must be arranged in 2x2 matrix. Then monitor displays 3840x2400 @13Hz or @41Hz.
This worked very well in Ubuntu 6.06. Installed Ubuntu 7.04 and ended up with something like 800x480, even with nVidia binary drivers. Tweaked xorg.conf for weeks to get this to work. BulletProofX kept messing with my hand crafted xorg.conf file; which did work with 6.06. Eventually gave up and started using Windaz again :-( Will try again when frustration level has come down.
2395
votes
2622
1
227
Compiz Effect Preview
Written by Sepidar the 12 Mar 08 at 06:58.
Global category: Graphics.
New
When you are activating a compiz effect, you actually don't know what will you get. So these effects (and perhaps tips for using them) can be previewed in a short flash movie so you will know what you are doing. Google Sketch Up already has something like this.
Eye of Gnome - Permanent rotate and delete button
Written by foe the 15 Apr 08 at 13:26.
Global category: Graphics.
Not an idea
Eye of gnome is the default image viewing application and is great for quickly check the pictures you just took with a digital camera. Unfortunately there are 2 major (and rather straightforward) improvements that need to be addressed:
[1] by default, when an image is rotated, the rotated version should overwrite the original
[2] there should be a button to quickly delete images
I think this 2 functions should be easy to implement and also what people coming from other OSs would expect.
PS. Sorry for typo in title! Can't change it... yet...
Can't preview .xcf files without GIMP
Written by timnwells the 5 Nov 09 at 09:16.
Related project: Image Viewer (EoG) .
Not an idea
In nautilus I can see a thumbnail preview of .xcf files but I cannot seem to preview them in Image Viewer. Sometimes it would be good to be able to preview a .xcf file that is still being worked on without having to open it it gimp or export it to another format.
Fix Import of Camera Pictures in Linux
Written by lutimdale the 18 Feb 09 at 04:24.
Global category: Graphics.
New
Importing pictures is done by 90% of the people. It is very important, yet no attention is given to it. It should be installed by default in every desktop install.
Importing/managing pictures taken with a camera is broken on Linux/Ubuntu. There is not one good solution to this problem.
Let's review the candidates:
f-Spot:
imports pictures into folders like this
2009/01/02
2009/01/03
2009/02/01
This doesn't work since it expects you to use fspot to go find pictures (as in doesn't work at the file system level). It is also broken because it currently has a bug where it imports one day's picutres into 2 folders... argh!
gThumb:
uses Catalogues... I have no idea what this is and don't want to find out.
Imports pictures by date that you imported them.... so if you import 1 years worth of pictures, it puts them in one folder... very helpful.
digiKam:
ok, this one was close. It allows you to specify to import by date (IMport > Camera > xxx > Auto Creation of Albums > Date Based sub-albums). As in:
2009-01-01
2009-01-02
2009-02-28
Fantastik.... However, it doesn't work with all cameras (I have 4) and some sd cards.... fail. Also, the user interface is attrocious. It could not be more complicated. To do this process, you first have to do
Import > Camera > Add CAmera
[....]
Solution #1:
Fix f-spot import
Ideally, we can achieve this by having a folder structure like this:
Date Tag
--------- -------------------------
2009-01-01 My birthday
2009-01-01 Some other event on the same day
2009-02-28 Yet antoher Event
On Import, a dialog should pop up and give thumbnail previews of the pictures. You can tag the pictures with a comment. If you have 2 or more events on the same day, it will create 2 folders. The first portion of the foldername should be based on exif date. The second portion should be the tag provided. If no date is provided, only the date would be used for the foldername.
Ideally, we can achieve this by having a folder structure like this:
Date Tag
--------- -------------------------
2009-01-01 My birthday
2009-01-01 Some other event on the same day
2009-02-28 Yet antoher Event
On Import, a dialog should pop up and give thumbnail previews of the pictures. You can tag the pictures with a comment. If you have 2 or more events on the same day, it will create 2 folders. The first portion of the foldername should be based on exif date. The second portion should be the tag provided. If no date is provided, only the date would be used for the foldername.
Solution #2:
Add a separate import Pictures application to Gnome
Similar to Solution #1, without relying on f-spot. This would simply be an app that is intalled by default that takes care of managing the import of pictures.
Similar to Solution #1, without relying on f-spot. This would simply be an app that is intalled by default that takes care of managing the import of pictures.
Solution #3:
Educate people about f-spot
Written by
viraptor the 19 Feb 09 at 13:29.
F-spot was made with a good design in mind. It does the pictures organisation, searching, tagging, etc. nicely. People complain a lot, because what they expect to see is a simple app that will just put pictures in some specific directories. gThumb does it already and using it, you can organise the directories yourself.
Create a tour of f-spot to show people how to deal with f-spot properly. Show some standard use cases - importing, exporting, browsing.
For example here, the "problem" is that "lutimdale" expects pictures to be labeled in the filesystem, because:
People want to be able to organize pictures by date and by events typically.
People want to be able to access their pictures at the file system level easily for backup, sharing, retrieval purposes.
F-spot pictures are already organised by date. You can organise them by events by tagging them.
You can backup your pictures by copying the whole Photos directory and the database - it's explained in the FAQ. You can share the pictures by selecting them in f-spot and exporting (to picasa, flickr, local directory, email, ...). If you want a filesystem path for one image, you can copy it easily without leaving f-spot.
Tour about f-spot should include the information, that it is an advantage that you don't have to switch between the "album" and "filesystem" ideas, because all needed functionality is already provided by f-spot. It might mention programs that DO work on the filesystem level (gThumb, picasa) if someone was looking for them instead.
F-spot was made with a good design in mind. It does the pictures organisation, searching, tagging, etc. nicely. People complain a lot, because what they expect to see is a simple app that will just put pictures in some specific directories. gThumb does it already and using it, you can organise the directories yourself.
Create a tour of f-spot to show people how to deal with f-spot properly. Show some standard use cases - importing, exporting, browsing.
For example here, the "problem" is that "lutimdale" expects pictures to be labeled in the filesystem, because:
People want to be able to organize pictures by date and by events typically.
People want to be able to access their pictures at the file system level easily for backup, sharing, retrieval purposes.
F-spot pictures are already organised by date. You can organise them by events by tagging them.
You can backup your pictures by copying the whole Photos directory and the database - it's explained in the FAQ. You can share the pictures by selecting them in f-spot and exporting (to picasa, flickr, local directory, email, ...). If you want a filesystem path for one image, you can copy it easily without leaving f-spot.
Tour about f-spot should include the information, that it is an advantage that you don't have to switch between the "album" and "filesystem" ideas, because all needed functionality is already provided by f-spot. It might mention programs that DO work on the filesystem level (gThumb, picasa) if someone was looking for them instead.
Solution #4:
general app that can import all media from (removeble)devices
create a general app that can import all sorts of media(eg. pictures, sounds, movies, text) and store them according to creation date, file-size, file-type or a combination of them. also grouping them to specific applications to open/view them.
create a general app that can import all sorts of media(eg. pictures, sounds, movies, text) and store them according to creation date, file-size, file-type or a combination of them. also grouping them to specific applications to open/view them.
Solution #5:
Use Rapid Photo Downloader
I am the developer of a program that meets these needs. Please see http://damonlynch.net/rapid
Color depth in "Screen and Graphics" applet
Written by nullmind the 19 Mar 08 at 09:07.
Global category: Graphics.
New
I think the "Screen and Graphics" applet should allow the user to set the color depth. I use an Intel 855GM graphics card (using either the i810 or intel module) which doens't perform well (or isn't accelerated well) in 24-bit color mode, so I run in 16-bit color mode for most operations. This requires a modification of /etc/X11/xorg.conf, which is unfortunate.
Cheers,
Kris
Changing font color in Gnome panel requires hacking
Written by wleoncio the 5 Aug 09 at 12:06.
Related project: Gnome .
New
This is a problem that affects practically anyone who enjoys tweaking his desktop. Sometimes, the background color (or texture) one chooses doesn't go with the window theme's font color. The problem is that it is not yet possible to change the panel font color by right-clicking a panel and choosing "Properties". Instead, one must create a file on his home folder and insert some code, on which he must inform the RGB code for the color he wants. Altogether, it is a very complicated procedure for anyone who's not a geek, which definitely detracts from the user experience (one of the main foci of the Ubuntu devs).
Monitor color profiling
Written by HDave the 29 Feb 08 at 04:47.
Global category: Graphics.
Implemented
Ubuntu needs a way to ensure the colors displayed on your monitor are correct. This is important for photo editing software such as Gimp as well as video editing or painting software.
Ubuntu should provide a way to do this for ordinary users that don't have a hardware colorimeter.
For those who do have a colorimeter (such as a Spyder 2) then Ubuntu should have a program than can easily create and load on-demand monitor (ICC) profiles.
Edit: This is also known as Color Management.
Redesign ubuntu for 2010
Written by vbman11 the 21 Jan 09 at 22:10.
Global category: Graphics.
Implemented
Im talking about a complete look and feel redesign. Right now ubuntu is (default) one of the uglyest os's out. And osx is probebly the best. Now i also want to propose a change in the version numbering. When ubuntu gets to 10 the next one should be 10.1, 10.2 and so on, because it confuses new and non users.
945
votes
978
32
33
Selected solution (#2):
Improve existing gnome interface
Improve the ability of the gnome panels to handle transparency and improve the way some of the applets scale if resized. Improve the menu so it doesn't take up so much space on the panel, to reduce the need for 2 panels. Allow for theme search and download from places like gnome-look.org, etc
Improve the ability of the gnome panels to handle transparency and improve the way some of the applets scale if resized. Improve the menu so it doesn't take up so much space on the panel, to reduce the need for 2 panels. Allow for theme search and download from places like gnome-look.org, etc
-251
votes
88
87
339
Selected solution (#3):
Let the users decide what they want by themselves
There are applets that do that already, but are not included by default.
There is Emerald that can chnage the windows decoration and make them "pretty".
There is Compiz-Fusion that provides advaced windows managment and is even more powerfull that the MAC OS effects, or at least as powerfull as it.
There is Gnome-Do, AWN, Cairo dock and others that can replace the bottom Gnome panel.
So everything that you wish is here just not by default, as some just don't want the same thing as you or I want.
There are applets that do that already, but are not included by default.
There is Emerald that can chnage the windows decoration and make them "pretty".
There is Compiz-Fusion that provides advaced windows managment and is even more powerfull that the MAC OS effects, or at least as powerfull as it.
There is Gnome-Do, AWN, Cairo dock and others that can replace the bottom Gnome panel.
So everything that you wish is here just not by default, as some just don't want the same thing as you or I want.
-199
votes
163
44
362
Selected solution (#5):
Take advantage of KDE4 visual bling
Written by
onestone the 27 Jan 09 at 17:18.
KDE 4.2 is already awesome, and by 2010 it will probably be the most attractive desktop available. Create a modern Ubuntu-style default theme for KDE4 (orange + brown + Oxygen/Breathe) and rename Kubuntu to "Ubuntu KDE Edition" or similar. Give the GNOME and KDE editions equal visibility and let the users choose which one they prefer.
KDE 4.2 is already awesome, and by 2010 it will probably be the most attractive desktop available. Create a modern Ubuntu-style default theme for KDE4 (orange + brown + Oxygen/Breathe) and rename Kubuntu to "Ubuntu KDE Edition" or similar. Give the GNOME and KDE editions equal visibility and let the users choose which one they prefer.
315
votes
407
70
92
Selected solution (#8):
Change colour scheme to a less eye-tiring one
Written by
yookoala the 2 Feb 09 at 18:32.
Red and orange are warm and sharp. They could look great, but it is tiring if we looking at them for long time. Red is especially bad since it is known as a warning colour.
Micro$oft and Apple use a lot of blue, green, black in their OS skin colour scheme, and that has reason. I often feel that Fedora's blue / purple colour scheme looks better than Human (Ubuntu default theme). And I often took time changing colour after installing Ubuntu.
I think being different does not mean we have to be exactly opposite. I think Ubuntu need a more eye friendly colour scheme design.
Red and orange are warm and sharp. They could look great, but it is tiring if we looking at them for long time. Red is especially bad since it is known as a warning colour.
Micro$oft and Apple use a lot of blue, green, black in their OS skin colour scheme, and that has reason. I often feel that Fedora's blue / purple colour scheme looks better than Human (Ubuntu default theme). And I often took time changing colour after installing Ubuntu.
I think being different does not mean we have to be exactly opposite. I think Ubuntu need a more eye friendly colour scheme design.
337
votes
408
64
71
Selected solution (#9):
Change Sound Scheme
Written by
dael99 the 3 Feb 09 at 20:49.
Top the 2010 we could choose a better intro sound, one that could look more professional or maybe less strange.
I'm not talking about add new sounds, cause they're just distracting, only replace the existing ones in order to make this release even more special.
Top the 2010 we could choose a better intro sound, one that could look more professional or maybe less strange.
I'm not talking about add new sounds, cause they're just distracting, only replace the existing ones in order to make this release even more special.
236
votes
296
74
60
Selected solution (#10):
Redesign user interface..
Written by
Daniele the 6 Feb 09 at 07:54.
I Think that gnome in general have to redesign user interface.. Why don't you make a Very simple guide on the creation themes for gnome?
So..we can do an ufficial Contest.. and this is also for the icons..
The other idea is to pay people for redesign user interface and icons..
But.. PLEASE CHANGE THIS GRAPHIC!!!..please :)
I Think that gnome in general have to redesign user interface.. Why don't you make a Very simple guide on the creation themes for gnome?
So..we can do an ufficial Contest.. and this is also for the icons..
The other idea is to pay people for redesign user interface and icons..
But.. PLEASE CHANGE THIS GRAPHIC!!!..please :)
-135
votes
111
72
246
Selected solution (#11):
add a dock
Written by
mitcoes the 8 Feb 09 at 15:57.
I'm using CAIRO, but any other good dock would give other asepct to the user interface.
I'm using CAIRO, but any other good dock would give other asepct to the user interface.
498
votes
513
10
15
Selected solution (#12):
One-click theme download and more modern theme choices.
The look problem is because the pre-installed themes are rather antiquated, and installing new themes is a pain.
Provide a few more modern theme options by default, and make searchable and one-click download of new themes available. That ease of CHOICE would go a long way towards cutting down on the current disgruntled cage-rattling about being trapped in a visual style that can't quite fit from one person to the next.
The look problem is because the pre-installed themes are rather antiquated, and installing new themes is a pain.
Provide a few more modern theme options by default, and make searchable and one-click download of new themes available. That ease of CHOICE would go a long way towards cutting down on the current disgruntled cage-rattling about being trapped in a visual style that can't quite fit from one person to the next.
210
votes
223
44
13
Selected solution (#13):
Support Cimi with RGBA
Cimi (
http://www.cimitan.com/blog/) is working hard on the new Clearlooks and Murrine Engines. And he's done an amzing job. But he also is a human beeing and has real life things to do. So all that nice new gtk features just take too long.
But with the RGBA thing he is working on we could finally have all that nice visual effects like little rounded corners in menus, or slight transparency where there is just this old gray at the moment. I am not speaking of eye candy many people hate, this is just about beautiful things macos and vista have. And of course we can do even better ;)
I just don't get it why so few people are paying attention to his relly great work... This new gtk technologies are what we need and also SABDFL speaks about!
Cimi (http://www.cimitan.com/blog/) is working hard on the new Clearlooks and Murrine Engines. And he's done an amzing job. But he also is a human beeing and has real life things to do. So all that nice new gtk features just take too long.
But with the RGBA thing he is working on we could finally have all that nice visual effects like little rounded corners in menus, or slight transparency where there is just this old gray at the moment. I am not speaking of eye candy many people hate, this is just about beautiful things macos and vista have. And of course we can do even better ;)
I just don't get it why so few people are paying attention to his relly great work... This new gtk technologies are what we need and also SABDFL speaks about!
-133
votes
39
32
172
Selected solution (#16):
Create a "Mark Suttleworth's 2010 A Space Odyssey Theme"
This can be a contest to make a theme for the year 2010. The top prize will have the winners theme as the default/included theme with this historic event.
This can be a contest to make a theme for the year 2010. The top prize will have the winners theme as the default/included theme with this historic event.
109
votes
117
28
8
Selected solution (#18):
Coherent Screen Saver Lock Dialog
Written by
dael99 the 17 Feb 09 at 14:52.
This dialogue can be themed just like GDM so, why don't have a theme for this by default? there IS a human theme for this, we should implement it, or get a better one.
This dialogue can be themed just like GDM so, why don't have a theme for this by default? there IS a human theme for this, we should implement it, or get a better one.
-120
votes
24
13
144
Selected solution (#19):
Ubuntu needs new air
Written by
Daniele the 18 Feb 09 at 10:34.
What about create a new DE? Gnome looks too old, kde is good but..also has something wrong..
A new modern, cool, clear DE.. We really wants a new and cool Interface..c'mon..please
What about create a new DE? Gnome looks too old, kde is good but..also has something wrong..
A new modern, cool, clear DE.. We really wants a new and cool Interface..c'mon..please
-51
votes
20
23
71
Selected solution (#20):
Use existing DEs to get the new look
I think if Enlightenment someday becomes "stable" (I think it's still in beta) it would be wonderful addition to Ubuntu.
If I understand the idea of E17 is that it can be used as an WM on Gnome and KDE. So maybe Ubuntu (I feel that Kubuntu and KDE don't need E17) could be made more beautiful and "futuristic" with help of E17.
Also LXDE is a another totally different way (bust still falls under this solution) as it gives fastness and responsiveness as any other DE. And it reminds me to KDE3, which could go a long way for all that think that KDE4 isn't the way KDE should go.
(I feel it's better than what's #19 is proposing to develop a new DE, if that's not a case then the OP (of #19) should be more clear)
I think if Enlightenment someday becomes "stable" (I think it's still in beta) it would be wonderful addition to Ubuntu.
If I understand the idea of E17 is that it can be used as an WM on Gnome and KDE. So maybe Ubuntu (I feel that Kubuntu and KDE don't need E17) could be made more beautiful and "futuristic" with help of E17.
Also LXDE is a another totally different way (bust still falls under this solution) as it gives fastness and responsiveness as any other DE. And it reminds me to KDE3, which could go a long way for all that think that KDE4 isn't the way KDE should go.
(I feel it's better than what's #19 is proposing to develop a new DE, if that's not a case then the OP (of #19) should be more clear)
-44
votes
29
14
73
Selected solution (#23):
Reduce Gnome-Pannels to ONE
Written by
dael99 the 20 Feb 09 at 21:10.
yes, one.
How?
Why should we need a systray? I Think that this piece of our desktop is the father of the notifications... I mean, without this, apps showing notifications won't tell the user from where it is (got the idea don't you?).
So, having the taskbar and the launchers togheter exists, and it's called Dock, but i really hate the concept of a dock, something that is floating on the botton of your desktop... it looks odd.
So, I think it should be integrated in the gnome-pannel with the Applet flavour.
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/ZG9HTGR83cLUue2yptqDGQ?feat=directlink
Ok, i will explain...
on the left is the gnome-menu applet with some of the menu redesign ideas... one button only.
the space left in there is for other idea... but that for later.
in the middle, we have the All-Mighty Taskbat Systrasy Launcher Applet aka uMighty
the concept is incredible easy. let's take Pidgin for this example.
Actually, you add the pidgin icon to the launcher area, open it and a new button appears on the taskbar, also an icon appears on the systray, where all trhe notifications are shown.
In my idea, you use THAT launcher for all. Notifications come from that app, so the user knows exactly the app related to the message.
http://picasaweb.google.com/dael99/Mockups#5298972082062305506
(it's a notification not an mouse-hover, for that we will kepp the app title)
then, the contextual action from the systray are replacer by quick-actions menu.
http://picasaweb.google.com/dael99/Mockups#5298972083016862258
The minimize, maximize options are discarded, because the icon itself handles that (just like a dock). take the options there as an example only... that depends on the app itself.
So, maybe you think i'm doing another dock, but it's just an applet, no effects, no glossy, no nothing, just simple and functional as it should have been from the start.
(
Other thing to take in consideration is the difference between win and mac with the three elements. Win uses the quick launch bar, the taskbar, and the systray in one panel, coll, isn't it?
Mac uses the systray on the top, and the taskbar/launcher toghether on the botton, coller no?
But, we make a BIG difference, because, we use the three elements int the same panel, like win, but togheter, betten than mac!
)
Now, what happens with the recicle bin? adn the desktop switcher...
the other trick: the nuclear icon on the right (take the icon as a concept not a a alert symbol) is used to destroy.
1) when you click it, you get the shutdown menu, like ever but, the traditional shutdown menu (the IM status are handled by the IM app, it's logic!).
2) when you drag a file on it, you delete it. (now, the problem is whre you found the files later..)
3) when you Drag the icon out of it's boundaries, it behaves just like the force-app-exit applet (you drop the icon on an inestable app and ot's forced to quit)
So, this doesn't present a weird thing only mixes the functionalities of some olds applets.
So, that's he main idea. One panel, a lot of functions.
For the backgound we coulkd use a gradient (bitmap-based please, that way we only copy the matrix to the ram, no CPU computing needed) or the actual fake transparency of the gnome-pannels
http://picasaweb.google.com/dael99/Mockups#5289103003311901602 (ignore the dock... )
yes, one.
How?
Why should we need a systray? I Think that this piece of our desktop is the father of the notifications... I mean, without this, apps showing notifications won't tell the user from where it is (got the idea don't you?).
So, having the taskbar and the launchers togheter exists, and it's called Dock, but i really hate the concept of a dock, something that is floating on the botton of your desktop... it looks odd.
So, I think it should be integrated in the gnome-pannel with the Applet flavour.
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/ZG9HTGR83cLUue2yptqDGQ?feat=directlink
Ok, i will explain...
on the left is the gnome-menu applet with some of the menu redesign ideas... one button only.
the space left in there is for other idea... but that for later.
in the middle, we have the All-Mighty Taskbat Systrasy Launcher Applet aka uMighty
the concept is incredible easy. let's take Pidgin for this example.
Actually, you add the pidgin icon to the launcher area, open it and a new button appears on the taskbar, also an icon appears on the systray, where all trhe notifications are shown.
In my idea, you use THAT launcher for all. Notifications come from that app, so the user knows exactly the app related to the message.
http://picasaweb.google.com/dael99/Mockups#5298972082062305506
(it's a notification not an mouse-hover, for that we will kepp the app title)
then, the contextual action from the systray are replacer by quick-actions menu.
http://picasaweb.google.com/dael99/Mockups#5298972083016862258
The minimize, maximize options are discarded, because the icon itself handles that (just like a dock). take the options there as an example only... that depends on the app itself.
So, maybe you think i'm doing another dock, but it's just an applet, no effects, no glossy, no nothing, just simple and functional as it should have been from the start.
(
Other thing to take in consideration is the difference between win and mac with the three elements. Win uses the quick launch bar, the taskbar, and the systray in one panel, coll, isn't it?
Mac uses the systray on the top, and the taskbar/launcher toghether on the botton, coller no?
But, we make a BIG difference, because, we use the three elements int the same panel, like win, but togheter, betten than mac!
)
Now, what happens with the recicle bin? adn the desktop switcher...
the other trick: the nuclear icon on the right (take the icon as a concept not a a alert symbol) is used to destroy.
1) when you click it, you get the shutdown menu, like ever but, the traditional shutdown menu (the IM status are handled by the IM app, it's logic!).
2) when you drag a file on it, you delete it. (now, the problem is whre you found the files later..)
3) when you Drag the icon out of it's boundaries, it behaves just like the force-app-exit applet (you drop the icon on an inestable app and ot's forced to quit)
So, this doesn't present a weird thing only mixes the functionalities of some olds applets.
So, that's he main idea. One panel, a lot of functions.
For the backgound we coulkd use a gradient (bitmap-based please, that way we only copy the matrix to the ram, no CPU computing needed) or the actual fake transparency of the gnome-pannels
http://picasaweb.google.com/dael99/Mockups#5289103003311901602 (ignore the dock... )
58
votes
64
3
6
Selected solution (#24):
GNOME-Shell Option in 10.04
The GNOME Project is working on completely revamping their interface for version 3.
From the website:
Overview
The GNOME Shell has rich visual effects enabled by new graphical technologies and redefines the following user interactions:
* Launching applicationseven better
* Opening files
* Switching between open windows
* Adding and deleting workspaces
* Moving windows between workspaces
* Dynamic system-related information display (including transient notifications)
* Providing a flat list of user-account related actions
* Logging out or switching the session, and stopping or restarting the machine
Design Principles
The guiding principles behind GNOME Shell are based on making the desktop an intuitive and convenient tool for accessing applications, documents, contacts, notifications and system preferences. GNOME Shell design goals are:
* To provide few clear starting targets and expose convenient features in order to create a good experience for novice, as well as experienced, users
o "Activities" and user-actions buttons, built-in search, exposing workspaces
* To define particular ways in which desktop components should work instead of making them infinitely configurable, thereby making a default desktop behaviour and its integration with the rest of the system create a consistent and well-organized user experience
* To reduce the time taken to find pertinent information
o Consistent and familiar placing of information-display widgets
* To reduce the time taken to execute frequent operations
o Flat lists of applications and files, mouse or keyboard-mediated activation
* To reduce in time taken to find less frequently used items
o Keyboard-mediated search
* To reduce in time taken to execute less frequently performed operations
o Keyboard-mediated search
Current Features
Panel
The top panel has two clear targets for the user:
* Activities button in the left corner that brings up the Overlay
* User name and icon in the right corner that bring up the user menu with system-related actions
Overlay
Overlay mode is a full-screen mode that allows the user to concentrate on switching to a new activity by opening new applications, documents, or both. It displays all the current user workspaces and open windows and facilitates organizing them. The current screenshot of the overlay mode can be seen here.
The overlay sidebar has the following attributes:
* It is a flat list of frequently used applications and recently opened files
* It provides a search widget for both applications and files
* The applications and files can be launched by clicking on them or by being dragged to a specific workspace
* It can be expanded to provide a full listing of applications or recent files
The overlay main area has the following attributes:
* It contains all the user workspaces with the windows that are opened on them
* It contains controls for adding new workspaces and removing empty workspaces
* It allows dragging open windows between workspaces
The user benefits of this approach are:
* Simpler and easier mouse or keyboard-based launching and opening of frequently performed activities
* A more efficient search-based launching and opening mechanism for less frequently performed activities
* Visually rich representation of all the activities and ability to organize them
######
Website:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell
Images:
http://owtaylor.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/gnome-shell-20090209.png
http://live.gnome.org/Boston2008/GUIHackfest/WindowManagementAndMore?action=Att achFile&do=get&target=fuser_actions_menu.png
http://live.gnome.org/Boston2008/GUIHackfest/WindowManagementAndMore?action=Att achFile&do=get&target=appmenu_creativeapps-flatlist.png
http://live.gnome.org/Boston2008/GUIHackfest/WindowManagementAndMore?action=Att achFile&do=get&target=appmenu_app-with-currently-open-windows.png
The GNOME Project is working on completely revamping their interface for version 3.
From the website:
Overview
The GNOME Shell has rich visual effects enabled by new graphical technologies and redefines the following user interactions:
* Launching applicationseven better
* Opening files
* Switching between open windows
* Adding and deleting workspaces
* Moving windows between workspaces
* Dynamic system-related information display (including transient notifications)
* Providing a flat list of user-account related actions
* Logging out or switching the session, and stopping or restarting the machine
Design Principles
The guiding principles behind GNOME Shell are based on making the desktop an intuitive and convenient tool for accessing applications, documents, contacts, notifications and system preferences. GNOME Shell design goals are:
* To provide few clear starting targets and expose convenient features in order to create a good experience for novice, as well as experienced, users
o "Activities" and user-actions buttons, built-in search, exposing workspaces
* To define particular ways in which desktop components should work instead of making them infinitely configurable, thereby making a default desktop behaviour and its integration with the rest of the system create a consistent and well-organized user experience
* To reduce the time taken to find pertinent information
o Consistent and familiar placing of information-display widgets
* To reduce the time taken to execute frequent operations
o Flat lists of applications and files, mouse or keyboard-mediated activation
* To reduce in time taken to find less frequently used items
o Keyboard-mediated search
* To reduce in time taken to execute less frequently performed operations
o Keyboard-mediated search
Current Features
Panel
The top panel has two clear targets for the user:
* Activities button in the left corner that brings up the Overlay
* User name and icon in the right corner that bring up the user menu with system-related actions
Overlay
Overlay mode is a full-screen mode that allows the user to concentrate on switching to a new activity by opening new applications, documents, or both. It displays all the current user workspaces and open windows and facilitates organizing them. The current screenshot of the overlay mode can be seen here.
The overlay sidebar has the following attributes:
* It is a flat list of frequently used applications and recently opened files
* It provides a search widget for both applications and files
* The applications and files can be launched by clicking on them or by being dragged to a specific workspace
* It can be expanded to provide a full listing of applications or recent files
The overlay main area has the following attributes:
* It contains all the user workspaces with the windows that are opened on them
* It contains controls for adding new workspaces and removing empty workspaces
* It allows dragging open windows between workspaces
The user benefits of this approach are:
* Simpler and easier mouse or keyboard-based launching and opening of frequently performed activities
* A more efficient search-based launching and opening mechanism for less frequently performed activities
* Visually rich representation of all the activities and ability to organize them
######
Website:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell
Images:
http://owtaylor.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/gnome-shell-20090209.png
http://live.gnome.org/Boston2008/GUIHackfest/WindowManagementAndMore?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=fuser_actions_menu.png
http://live.gnome.org/Boston2008/GUIHackfest/WindowManagementAndMore?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=appmenu_creativeapps-flatlist.png
http://live.gnome.org/Boston2008/GUIHackfest/WindowManagementAndMore?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=appmenu_app-with-currently-open-windows.png
18
votes
30
4
12
Selected solution (#25):
Look at the Copenhagen concept;
A user interface designer has made a conceptual redesign of windows. Microsoft has not hired him [yet] so maybe the community should try to get in touch with him. Judging by his concept he could make Ubuntu pretty amazing even if he only helped with minor changes to the UI. Ubuntu will always be better than windows, but users will usually choose what looks or feels nicer, regardless of the behind-the-scenes.
His concept and a little about it are here:
http://vimeo.com/4255076
A user interface designer has made a conceptual redesign of windows. Microsoft has not hired him [yet] so maybe the community should try to get in touch with him. Judging by his concept he could make Ubuntu pretty amazing even if he only helped with minor changes to the UI. Ubuntu will always be better than windows, but users will usually choose what looks or feels nicer, regardless of the behind-the-scenes.
His concept and a little about it are here:
http://vimeo.com/4255076
-14
votes
5
3
19
Selected solution (#26):
New window manager especially for Ubuntu
Ubuntu has shown to be the most used distro, and there are so many bugs with gnome/compiz fusion. It is time that a window manager should be hand-taylored to fit the needs of ubuntu!
Ubuntu has shown to be the most used distro, and there are so many bugs with gnome/compiz fusion. It is time that a window manager should be hand-taylored to fit the needs of ubuntu!
17
votes
26
0
9
Selected solution (#27):
New GNOME 3 concept
Written by
liveD the 27 May 09 at 18:52.
Hi,
I make a concept for Gnome 3 shell, in this you can see curved style and transparence, elegant style united at desktop experience.
I think we must create a new style without copy windows or mac, imho we must improve a new concept of interface, reducing windows, for less chaos in desktop.
linux with the relevant interfaces (moblin etc) and mobile telephones (android-nokia/qt) is become a reality for most users.
My idea is to recreate just a little, the interfaces concept that the user could find in a netbook or in a mobile phone, so as to find familiar the graphic interface for user in a free desktop.
link:
http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/New+GNOME+3+Shell+concept?content=10 5672
Hi,
I make a concept for Gnome 3 shell, in this you can see curved style and transparence, elegant style united at desktop experience.
I think we must create a new style without copy windows or mac, imho we must improve a new concept of interface, reducing windows, for less chaos in desktop.
linux with the relevant interfaces (moblin etc) and mobile telephones (android-nokia/qt) is become a reality for most users.
My idea is to recreate just a little, the interfaces concept that the user could find in a netbook or in a mobile phone, so as to find familiar the graphic interface for user in a free desktop.
link:
http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/New+GNOME+3+Shell+concept?content=105672
<a href="http://img401.imageshack.us/i/105672gnomeshell.jpg/" target="_blank"><img src="http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/9559/105672gnomeshell.th.jpg" border="0" alt="Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us" /></a><br /><br /><a href="http://img604.imageshack.us/content.php?page=blogpost&files=img401/9559/105672gnomeshell.jpg"
united to graphic effects of the opengl and usability, I believe that will be a goal for ubuntu, in fact i send a mail with my mockup to ''ubuntu desktop experience team'' and i'm attending for responses.
I believe that unfounded gnome3 for an entire revisitation of style and graphic art will be decisive for the future of the free desktop.
visit the link, thanks for waching.
11
votes
19
2
8
Selected solution (#28):
Use this Gnome-Shell Variant
Written by
yookoala the 13 Jul 09 at 13:21.
I didn't make it. I saw it here:
http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/A+Gnome-Shell+Variant?action=content&content=108332
<a href="http://www.gnome-look.org/CONTENT/content-pre1/108332-1.jpg"><img src="http://www.gnome-look.org/CONTENT/content-pre1/108332-1.jpg" width="600" /></a>
<a href="http://www.gnome-look.org/CONTENT/content-pre1/108332-2.jpg"><img src="http://www.gnome-look.org/CONTENT/content-pre2/108332-2.jpg" width="600" /></a>
8
votes
10
4
2
Selected solution (#29):
Not to mix "Visual Effect" with "Interface Design"
Written by
yookoala the 14 Jul 09 at 16:00.
I don't think solution #28 belongs to this idea.
Idea #20656 , Solution #28, and
this Gnome-Shell Variant are about "Interface Design", which concerns making Ubuntu a **easier system to use**.
While
idea #17540 is about "Look-and-feel Design", which concerns making Ubuntu a **better-looking system**.
Sometimes, making a system looks better does help usability, but still they are really different things. My main concern is completely different from "look-and-feel", so I created
Idea #20656 separately. And it is merged here.
I think this would blur the whole point of both the idea and the solution.
Please, if you can do something on this, do something. Thanks.
I don't think solution #28 belongs to this idea.
<a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/20656/">Idea #20656</a>, Solution #28, and <a href="http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/A+Gnome-Shell+Variant?action=content&content=108332">this Gnome-Shell Variant</a> are about "Interface Design", which concerns making Ubuntu a **easier system to use**.
While <a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/17540/">idea #17540</a> is about "Look-and-feel Design", which concerns making Ubuntu a **better-looking system**.
Sometimes, making a system looks better does help usability, but still they are really different things. My main concern is completely different from "look-and-feel", so I created <a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/20656/">Idea #20656</a> separately. And it is merged here.
I think this would blur the whole point of both the idea and the solution.
Please, if you can do something on this, do something. Thanks.
-5
votes
2
1
7
Selected solution (#31):
Add awn dock instead of old dusty panels
Written by
heiko81 the 13 Oct 09 at 10:37.
I think that adding a dock should be very attractive for new users of this os..I think that it should be a new idea that would serve as a wind of fresh air for Ubuntu..the first thing that a normal person sees about an OS, is its look and feel and about this regard he or she makes his judgement about the OS..then come the usability and the reliability..
the desktop is stuck with the two panels since its beginnings and I think that the panels are dusty enough..maybe a dock or even a new way of thinking the desktop should be necessary..now we are in the era of Iphone and touchscreens..
some steps have also been made in the renewing, but I hope there will be more for the sake of Ubuntu..
let's watch to the future..let's make Ubuntu the future..
I think that adding a dock should be very attractive for new users of this os..I think that it should be a new idea that would serve as a wind of fresh air for Ubuntu..the first thing that a normal person sees about an OS, is its look and feel and about this regard he or she makes his judgement about the OS..then come the usability and the reliability..
the desktop is stuck with the two panels since its beginnings and I think that the panels are dusty enough..maybe a dock or even a new way of thinking the desktop should be necessary..now we are in the era of Iphone and touchscreens..
some steps have also been made in the renewing, but I hope there will be more for the sake of Ubuntu..
let's watch to the future..let's make Ubuntu the future..