Ubuntu QA:
BlogBrainstormPackage status
Log in
Ubuntu QA
Firefox
Idea sandbox Idea sandbox
Popular ideas Popular ideas
Ideas in development Ideas in development
Implemented ideas Implemented ideas

Popular ideas Here are the most popular ideas ever about Firefox.

Native Firefox on Ubuntu is even slower than on Wine  
Written by Dinth the 15 Feb 09 at 12:43. New
This new benchmark shows that native linux version of Firefox is very slow comparing to Windows version, even when run on Wine.
1087
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Compile Firefox with PGO by default
Written by Dinth the 15 Feb 09 at 12:43.
One of reasons why Firefox is so slow on Linux, is that Windows version is compiled with PGO - https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Building_with_Profile-Guided_Optimization . Ubuntu devs should compile firefox packages with PGO enabled to speed up Firefox on Ubuntu
123
votes
up equal down
Solution #2: Compile Firefox with ICC (Intel compiler)
Written by Dinth the 15 Feb 09 at 12:46.
Propably compiling Firefox with ICC would greatly speed up this application.
It is a trouble when user must do compiling with so unusual compiler on his own, but Ubuntu devs can easly do it and put binary packages in repository, or at least PPA.
568
votes
up equal down
Solution #3: Add native 64bit Java and Flash packages to PPA
Written by Dinth the 15 Feb 09 at 12:52.
There are avalible native 64bit Java and Flash versions on Suns and Adobe websites. ATM they are in beta state, but there are pretty much stable, so why dont package them to repo or at least PPA? This would greatly speed up Firefox on 64bit systems - now, sometimes nspluginwrappers takes 50% of cpu power when playing video from some sites.
410
votes
up equal down
Solution #4: Help with Systemtap so that Developers can work out WTF is going on
Written by AndrewLuecke the 16 Feb 09 at 13:19.
Its simple, profiling tools on Ubuntu are WAY behind.

Ubuntu should join in on the Systemtap project so that we have a better tool available to help identify the reasons why Firefox is so slow on Linux.

Doing so will also speed up every other program in the repos.
918
votes
up equal down
Solution #5: Work with Mozilla to Ensure Linux version is Perfomance Optimized
Written by lutimdale the 18 Feb 09 at 04:37.
There probably aren't as many developers testing the linux version as this isn't the biggest install base.
-265
votes
up equal down
Solution #6: Support the development of swiftweasel
Written by JanMalte the 19 Feb 09 at 06:56.
Support the development of the swiftweasel project.
This is an pgo compiled version of firefox.
http://swiftweasel.tuxfamily.org/
-420
votes
up equal down
Solution #7: Epiphany as default browser
Written by danielrmt the 26 Feb 09 at 20:11.
I have been using Epiphany for the last months, and I really enjoy it. I still miss some Firefox extensions, but it's ok. I think it is a good choice for Ubuntu. Maybe not now, but when it gets a stable webkit support.
-113
votes
up equal down
Solution #8: Support the development of Google's Chrome
Written by brownbat the 14 Mar 09 at 02:20.
The "support x browser instead" options are tanking, but I wanted to give everyone an option to vote down (or up?) Google's browser too.
-87
votes
up equal down
Solution #9: Port Firefox to Qt
Written by flammon the 14 Mar 09 at 22:18.
I love GNOME and use it every day, have been since pre 1.0 but I think that its weakest part is GTK/GDK. Qt is faster and GPL so perhaps it is time to start porting. Firefox is mostly written in C++ so using Qt shouldn't be a problem.

The project has already begun and I'm anxious to see the results.

http://browser.garage.maemo.org/news/10/
-33
votes
up equal down
Solution #11: Option to install firefox32 on 64-bit distributions
Written by sanketmedhi the 15 Apr 09 at 09:24.
Edit: I take this back. I upgraded to Janty 9.04 and Firefox works like a charm with the Flash 10 driver!

I have been using Ubuntu 64 bit versions for several years. And what I still don't like is that my system slows down pathetically when the browser tries to load a Flash or Java applet which are used on most pages on the Internet today, not to mention ads.

Although, its not exactly Ubuntu's problem that the sources providing these plugins do not entirely support x86_64 platforms, users should have the freedom to choose whether or not to use these packages and how to use them.

There should be a meta package that installs firefox32 and removes firefox64 on 64 bit versions of Ubuntu. Also, plugins for Firefox like Flash, Java, Adobe Reader, Shockwave, etc. should be replaced with 32 bit versions without any intervention.

See the 27 comments or propose a solution >>

Remove Ebay from default search engines list in firefox  
Written by Auzy the 22 Mar 08 at 01:06. New
Based on idea 5321, by Eldmannen (about removing yahoo).

We should remove ebay from the default installed searches, because:
- It reduces competition with other auction sites.
- Recently there was a uproar about changes in ebay which make in some case make it unfair. I agree!
- Ebay VERY heavily pushes Paypal, which is acknowledged by many to be very dodgy. A lot of people know someone who has been screwed by ebay. And here in aus, I had to upgrade my account because they had a bug which prevented me accessing my money (which is very unprofessional). The freenet Project owner was also screwed by ebay (and it demonstrated they don't research at all claims made against customers), and another friend of mine was charged 2x the amount he was supposed to be receiving because someone used a stolen credit card against him (so seems they profit from illegal credit cards).
- If ebay was a bank, they would have a 24/7 riot outside their building by customers who were screwed.
- Ebay doesn't exactly listen to feedback. If are a typical large company, where you have no way of providing feedback (if you scream at them over the phone, maybe they will let you speak to a manager). But they clearly dont care much (no forums).

Its to our advantage to promote competition within the auction sites. More competition means lower costs for us, and better payment methods. We should try to encourage the development of a world wide auction site that is more consumer/seller friendly, that actually promotes active feedback and improvement.

There is nothing stopping a patch being applied to the firefox code to prevent ebay being a default search engine (and it shouldn't be hard to do).
256
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #5361
Written by Auzy the 22 Mar 08 at 01:06.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #5361 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 29 comments or propose a solution >>

Horizontal scrolling when hovering horizontal scrollbar (Firefox/OpenOffice)  
Written by cousteau the 8 Dec 08 at 17:30. New
Most applications allow you to horizontally scroll when you use the scrollwheel over a horizontal scrollbar, but this doesn't happen neither on Firefox nor OpenOffice.org (Writer, Calc, etc). This can be a problem when you're watching a wide page.
131
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #16342
Written by cousteau the 8 Dec 08 at 17:30.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #16342 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 3 comments or propose a solution >>

Better Firefox integration in Ubuntu with dark themes  
Written by BlackLukes the 22 Apr 08 at 20:16. New
If someone is using a dark theme with Ubuntu, he will probably see all the input boxes and buttons filled with dark colours. This should be fixed, not everybody uses the default light theme.
126
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #7432
Written by BlackLukes the 22 Apr 08 at 20:16.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #7432 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 8 comments or propose a solution >>

Use firefox protocol handlers better  
Written by timnwells the 19 May 09 at 02:58. New
On my mobile device when browsing the web, I can click a tel: href and have my mobile device ask if I want to call, I can click sms: href's and have it start a new sms to the provided number. On windows I can click a skype: link and it is auto handled by skype etc.

It seems browsers on Windows and even mobile devices have more functionality in this regard than Firefox on Ubuntu.
107
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Make better use of the protocol handlers in firefox
Written by timnwells the 19 May 09 at 02:58.
If I have gnome-phone-manager configured, have tel: and sms: links call or sms via my mobile device. Allow skype: functionality for those using skype, do the same for pidgin. Have map: links pull up open street maps or google maps.

Why should I have less functionality on my pc than I do on my mobile device.

See the 2 comments or propose a solution >>

Firefox in Ubuntu should be able to save a file to a network share.  
Written by fedsotto the 14 Jan 09 at 15:17. New
In intrepid, when firefox opens the dialog to allow you to specify the name and path where you want to save a file; the dialog only shows your local places, i.e. it does not show your network places. So, you cannot save the file in a network share.

100
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Show network places in the save as dialog and allow users to save on the network
Written by fedsotto the 14 Jan 09 at 15:17.
I think that, in the same way that other applications do, firefox should support saving files on the network and that the dialog to save the file should also show your network places (previously bookmarked).

For example, you can compare the save as dialog of open office with the one shown by firefox. The former shows your network places, while the latter does not.
47
votes
up equal down
Solution #2: Unified solution for local file sharing
Written by jpka the 15 Jan 09 at 02:21.
This problem exist not only in Firefox.
I suggest an unified solution which is 1) simple; 2) nice; 3) not required to modify any existing and future user applications.
Remote folders can be mounted for example as /home/user/Network/server/share folder or so.
Please see http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/11613/
If it's be implemented, there never be strange smb:// or ftp:// or network:/// links or so, which confusing many software.
6
votes
up equal down
Solution #3: GIO support in XULRunner
Written by Tweenk the 21 Jan 09 at 01:28.
To make Firefox able to save to remote places, XULRunner needs to use GIO for file handling. It already uses GTK widgets which depend on GIO, so it should be doable.

See the 6 comments or propose a solution >>

Thumbnails of images in the filebrowser of the webrowsers.  
Written by Levo75 the 24 Apr 09 at 08:26. New
This is specifically for those moments when you browse through your imagefolder to find a specific picture to upload and all you see are 8x8 microthumbnails of the pictures and their filenames. The large thumbnail view like in vista and windows XP would be a very good source for reference. I don't know if Microsoft has any patents on this so I'll leave it to it if it's so.

For any ubuntu users that are also channers, this would be a great improvement.
95
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Solution to viewing larger thumbnails in the filebrowser in webrowsers.
Written by Levo75 the 24 Apr 09 at 08:26.
Whenever you click upload on any website, lets say flicker, or tinypic.com, you get a mini filebrowser to select your image. Going through a picturefolder of your vacation pictures for example usually don't have very clear names, like DSC001,DSC002 etc... Other than that you can see a miniscule thumbnail which is pretty much useless.

Give us a choice to see either large thumbnails or file lists.
3
votes
up equal down
Solution #2: Add a slider
Written by gforster the 19 May 09 at 23:54.
If there were a slider at the bottome of all filebrowser windows (inclduding those in the web brower), one could choose the size of the thumbnails quite easily. The slider would act like the one in OpenOfffice.org Writer. Either way, the one-thumbnail-at-a-time is almost useless.

See the 1 comments or propose a solution >>

There is an overwhelming choice of browser plugins for any given media type  
Written by Hawke the 22 Oct 09 at 02:21. New
When one attempts to play a video in Firefox (at, e.g. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/program.html ), there is a prompt to install a browser plugin.

Unfortunately, this prompt provides six options for Quicktime, and four options for RealVideo.

No hints are provided to the user as to which plugin is most likely to work. If they guess wrong, there’s no easy way to change their mind.
30
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Pick one plugin and go with it
Written by Hawke the 22 Oct 09 at 02:21.
Ideally, there should be no user choice here. Ubuntu should choose one plugin that works with the selected media type and prompt the user to install it. If no plugin always works, the best one should be enhanced so that it does.
72
votes
up equal down
Solution #2: Allow easy switching of plugins
Written by Hawke the 22 Oct 09 at 02:27.
There should be some way to easily choose which plugin to use after the fact. Figuring out which one is currently in use, which package it’s in, removing it, restarting the browser, and going through the plugin installation wizard again is too much of a hassle.

And when multiple plugins are installed, there’s no (easy?) way to choose which one will actually be used for a particular media type.
39
votes
up equal down
Solution #3: Show user ratings next to each plugin
Written by stoffel the 24 Oct 09 at 14:54.
There are plans to add support for user ratings to the Software Center ( https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareCenter ).

I think it would be a good idea to also add support for these ratings in the browser plugin choice dialog, for instance by showing a certain number of stars next to each plugin.

In this way it will be easy for users to make a better plugin choice.

See the 1 comments or propose a solution >>

Give file-size in firefox upload window  
Written by kramer65 the 11 Aug 08 at 10:50. New
When I upload photos I often have one small and one large version of the photo. To see which one was the small one I always need to go back in nautilus to see what the size of the files was.

If we have the file/image-size in the upload window I can see it immediately. This makes using it again a little bit more intuitive.
69
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #12100
Written by kramer65 the 11 Aug 08 at 10:50.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #12100 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 1 comments or propose a solution >>

Thumbnail view in firefox upload window.  
Written by kramer65 the 20 Jul 08 at 11:28. New
When you want to upload a foto on a webpage (webmail/fickr etc.) you get the upload selection window in which you need to select a photo. You cannot see thumbnails in this view, which is quite annoying. So you need to go back in the file manager and see what the exact file name is of the photo to select it.

If ubuntu wants to become more accepted by multimedia using people (http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/07/shuttleworths_u.html ), it needs to be extremely user friendly with simple things like this..
67
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #11321
Written by kramer65 the 20 Jul 08 at 11:28.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #11321 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 2 comments or propose a solution >>

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... Next >>