<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Ubuntu brainstorm]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Post your ideas and vote for the entries you like. Please read the posting <b><a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Brainstorm">guidelines</a></b> and <b><a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/advanced_search">check</a></b> if your idea has been posted already! ]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
 

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[85] shop.canonical.com should sell computers]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12723/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[When is still so hard to find on sale hardware with Ubuntu OEM (specially in Europe), would be awesome shop.canonical.com selling hardware (desktop, notebooks and netbooks) with Ubuntu OEM - this would help to increase the popularity of the Ubuntu OEM, and provide an interesting chain reaction on all hardware manufacturers, i hope.<br /><br />Everex also put on sale recently a desktop computer cheaper than a Windows Vista licence, which i considered a very interesting marketing idea (it seems to had a strong success on places like WalMart, for example).  The site shop.canonical.com could bet on this as well.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12723/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[59] make a plugin/extention to switch flash/gnash instantly]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12565/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[a plugin to allow a user to choose between flash players on the fly. this would<br />1) allow more widespread testing of gnash/gstreamer<br />2) allow gnash/gstreamer users to fall back on adobe flash if it fails<br /><br />blurb:<br />while gnash is a good video player it fails with certain content. Most new user, and even existing users dont want to suffer a diminished web experienced by using gnash or gstreamer so stick to adobe, this will allow them to get the benefits of gnash/gstreamer without having to put up with the weaknesses of any one player.<br /><br />valid flash players would include (others also avalible)<br />gstreamer - video only afaik<br />gnash - video and some games afaik <br />adobe flash 9 -buggy & high cpu usage<br />adobe flash 10-more temperamental w/ lower cpu usage <br /><br />I think this is best implemented as something like mozpluger as that would make it avalible to all the webbrowsers i can think of. but i can also imagine it<br />being usable as a simple extension (like flashblock but with options for others) for firefox as firefox is the main ubuntu browser.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12565/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[44] Mirror (to see yourself) in Compiz]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12595/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[If people have webcams, I think its a nice idea to have a face of the cube that is actually a mirror, that is to see yourself in full screen. So let's say you want to have a quick check on yourself, you do "ctrl + alt + up" and it changes to the mirror. Im saying compiz because it can actually make the whole cube more useful, but it can be a separate piece of software, that can be nicely integrated with a good shortcut.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12595/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[40] Work With ISPs To Provide Internet Connectivity For Linux Users.]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12291/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Ubuntu Netbook Remix has been doing the rounds in the press for a while now. But the fact of the matter is a netbook is useless if you can't get on-line.<br /><br />A common complaint of Linux users is they aren't supported by ISPs. Often getting things setup and working is a night mare process of manual configuration.<br /><br />In the Windows world it's normally a simpler case of running a little install program and it sets everything up for you. We need ISPs to start doing this for Linux users.<br /><br />Consumer Linux won't fly if you can't get on-line quickly and easily.<br /><br />http://www.ideastorm.com/article/show/10091616/Work_With_ISPs_To_Provide_Internet_Connectivity_For_Linux_Users<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12291/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[21] Add Emulators to the Repos.]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12310/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Console games are generally more fun, take less room, and work very well in Linux compared to commercial PC games.  There are several EXCELLENT emulators that run well in Linux but do not have a package in the repos, despite their fully FOSS nature.  I'd like to see updated builds of:<br /><br />Zsnes<br />Mupen64plus<br />Dolphin<br />PCSX2<br /><br />all in the repos.  The all run well, and the games for Zsnes alone easily trump hundreds of Windows based games.  It's frustrating to have to compile the source myself, or scrounge around for a .deb, particularly when all these emulators are fully open source.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12310/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[9] Put Examples in appropriate folder]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12257/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Images in images folder<br />video in video folder<br />etc...<br /><br />...and delete the examples folder<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12257/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[-7] Remove OpenOffice.org Splash Image]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12207/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Yes, I know OpenOffice.org takes forever to open so a giant block in the center of your screen with a tiny progress bar at the bottom is necessary.<br /><br />If you actually think of it, you'll realize I am right. Why does OpenOffice.org have a splash screen, when no other application does? It would integrate into the mass of other applications well if a "Starting OpenOffice.org" panel item was created for a few seconds, just like all other applications.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12207/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[131] Add save YouTube video feature in Totem]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12149/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[YouTube plugin for Totem is great but it would like to see a button or menu item for save the video on the local disk.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12149/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[8] Duplicate report contest]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12114/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Brainstorm has a problem: good ideas are lost among a huge amount of messy noise, including thousands of duplicates. I have just proposed duplicates for 5 of the 10 first "Most popular today", and I am pretty sure I missed some of them. One can check with "Random ideas" as well, it's not only a problem with recent ideas. Among the ~12000 official ideas in Brainstorm, how many are duplicates? <br /><br />Some people would say that it does not matter because bad or duplicated ideas are lost among tons of other uninteresting ideas, and that's a useless effort to track them and remove them from the server. They remind me people who sweep the dust under the carpet, where nobody can see it, because they are too lazy to remove it properly. I agree that the Brainstorm tool is not completely convenient to do that, but you don't need a powerful vacuum cleaner to remove the dust. The problem is that it is still possible to keep Brainstorm clean, but it will be much more difficult to do so with 100000 ideas. <br /><br />Only few of us seem to report duplicates, and that may be the problem. I have proposed duplicates for ideas with > 40 positive votes, which means that at least 40 people voted without checking if the idea has been already proposed. We are more than enough to tag all duplicates among the 12000 ideas, but we are not rewarded as "duplicate hunters". Why not adding a counter for the number of sucessfully reported duplicates in the dashboard, as well as a ranking, similar to the idea vote ranking? The point is just to add up a funny feature that can create a positive feedback --taking care of other's duplicates will automatically make people more aware of their own duplicates. <br /><br />(apart from that, some of my duplicate proposals have probably vanished while the duplicate was obvious to me. In the opposite, quite a few non-related ideas have been tagged as duplicates. I sometimes have the feeling that Brainstorm admins don't want to spend any extra time dealing with duplicate matters, and make many mistakes in sorting among duplicate proposals. In my opinion, even if they don't really care, we should, because ideas proposed here can be of benefit to the whole free software community, and not only to Ubuntu).<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12114/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[53] Enable user interface that recognises movement via a webcam]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12082/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Many computers have a webcam. Movement recognition technologies have progressed in the last years (as in the EyeToy series). However, no operating system has still implemented this interface with the user.<br /><br />Obviously, this kind of interface is not precise enough to provide a detailed control, but could be quite useful in some fields. For instance, it would be a great option to control document viewers, multimedia players, multimedia centers, and it also has many applications in gaming.<br /><br />As this technology is quite new, it could be a great way to provide an additional value that other operating systems do not offer. New users could be attracted by this technology, and experienced users could use it in the applications they develop.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12082/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[37] Download packages and dependencies without Internet access]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12081/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Hello. I am newbie on linux world and i find it is very difficult to manage the software if you don't have Internet access, which is my case. I would like to know if it could be possible to download the packages with all the dependencies needed at once. <br /><br />I'm sure i'm not the first one who ask about this but i would like to know if it would be feasible to do something like:<br /><br />1º User does "dpkg -l > list.txt" and take that file to the computer with Internet (for example: at work place)<br /><br />2º Then uses a browser at the package website to upload the file with the list of packages installed in its computer.<br /><br />3º It selects the software which want to download<br /><br />4º The site checks the dependencies needed with the packages list (list.txt) and download everything necessary.<br />It could also create a script to install all the downloaded packages in the user's computer.<br /><br />Thank you and sorry if i'm repeatting something which someboby already talked about<br /><br />PD. Sorry also about my english.<br /><br /><br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12081/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[157] Make sure Dell provides unbiased information about linux.]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12006/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[With dell's new netbook due to come out soon, it is extremely important for the growth of linux that they provide honest information about it. They shouldn't say something like:<br />"The linux option is cheaper than the xp option. However, it can not run most commercial programs" After reading that, why would anybody choose it? It should say something along the lines of:<br />"Linux is an open source alternative to Windows. This means it is completely free for anybody to use it in any way. It can do almost anything that you can do with windows. It cannot run windows software, but there are many free alternatives that do the same thing included with it. It comes with a word processor (That can handle .doc), a web browser, an email application, and many other utilities. It is also very easy to install new software, without the risk of viruses. In fact, there are virtually no viruses that can harm linux..."<br /><br />This explanation is fairly unbiased, and all true, and provides a much more pleasing alternative. However, dell will not do write such a description because of the pressure of microsoft. We need to push dell to write the truth if linux is ever going to be common among everyday users.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12006/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[20] Flag users with many similar comments/ideas as possible spammers]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11968/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Spammers generally post the same messages over and over again on dozens of ideas. Brainstorm should be capable of analysing users posts, determining how unique each of their posts are, and then flagging the user if their posts are all very similar (as it would strongly suggest they are spamming). <br /><br />This would provide a mechanism for spammers to be identified quickly, whilst forcing spammers to resort to posting real comments, and hiding the spam within them (inefficient in the spamming world), signing up to thousands of accounts, and post using different account names (but, account creation uses a captcha stopping that), or dumping random words within it (which will make the messages immediately obvious they contain spam).<br /><br />If we don't immediately get on top of the problem now, we will have no mechanism in place to protect against spam bots.  <br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11968/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[182] willwill100 look and feel (devianart)]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11930/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[This is not my idea, is from willwill100 on DevianArt:<br /><br />He/she make this mockup for Ubuntu and I think is one of the best ever created (my opinion).<br /><br />He/she doesn't know that I publish his/her ideas here... But I think that if Ubuntu has this Look and Feel, Ubuntu will be better (or best :P)<br /><br />http://willwill100.deviantart.com/art/Interpid-Ibex-Mockup-Part-1-93584571<br /><br />As always, excuse my poor english.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11930/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[52] Kde 4.1 for Intrepid Should Work Better, And Ubuntu Should make its own Icon Set]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11871/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I am using Kde 4.1 on my computer, while overall it looks better than 4.0, I have several complaints. First of all, can Kubuntu make its own KDE 4 Start menu icon? I mean how long would that take, two seconds? Second of all, can Kubuntu also make icons for the shut down , logout, restart, hibernate, etc.? Because right now all of the icons are the same when in 4.0 they were different. I used to have lock screen/logout widget, but since the icons are the same ugly kubuntu computer widget, I can't tell them apart. Furthermore, I wish it was more obvious how to move the plasma widgets in 4.1, but I suppose this is just a learning curve.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11871/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[43] Make Ubuntu Studio easier to install and use]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11864/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Ubuntu Studio is far behind Ubuntu in ease of use.  The installer is confusing to many users, and it requires too much configuration to get working.  The documentation is buried and instructions are lacking.  This is a niche market that I think Ubuntu can become extremely successful in.  I don't mean to sound condescending, but most Ubuntu Studio users aren't the most computer savvy people.  They tend to be creative types, who get discouraged when Ubuntu Studio doesn't work right out of the box.  Ubuntu Studio needs to be at least as easy to use as regular Ubuntu, if not easier.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />


<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=879408"> Ubuntuforums.org thread #879408</a>
<br/>

]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11864/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[38] Ubuntu experiment]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11874/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Create a website similar to the Mojave Experiment, except for Ubuntu.  This is a great marketing idea.  It would help show that Ubuntu is an easy to learn alternative to vista and xp.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11874/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[85] Encourage Users to work with Free Sotfware Formats]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11875/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I've been thinking... there is a lot of trouble with mp3, avi, wma, and all those multimedia formats. (I know legal issues) So, why not making EASIER and a smoother transition to free formats like Ogg. Ogg is actually BETTER than mp3. <br /><br />Its about giving information, making easier things.<br />Example:<br /><br />- When user tries to reproduce mp3 file: <br />offer 2 options, 1) convert to Ogg format and talk about advantages of this format, 2) download proprietary codecs<br /><br />- Every media player should ask this to the user on first run and convert it too if needed. <br /><br />This could be a solution with all the trouble with proprietary media files.<br /><br />FEEL FREE TO SUGGEST ANY OTHER WAY TO GET TO THE SAME OBJECTIVE, USE FREE FORMATS.<br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11875/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[143] Diagram of installed packages and dependencies]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11847/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I'd like Synaptic to be able to show me a diagram of all installed packages and their dependencies. This would give me a better idea of what branches of the synaptic package tree I can prune/uninstall, without problems to packages later in the chain.  <br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11847/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[105] Add Speex and Webcam to Pidgin.]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11738/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[This alone would move Ubuntu beyond Mac OS and Windows, particularly if it was easy to use, and you could then communicate directly p2p by hand shaking on any IM standard, either via jabber, AIM, yahoo, msn, skype, myspace, etc.<br /><br />Also, Hi-Speed Internet file transfers.  If you could easily move files at your maximum bandwidth easily with contacts from pidgin, many people would become more productive and faster.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11738/</guid>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>

