<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Ubuntu brainstorm]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Post your ideas and vote for the entries you like. Please read the posting <b><a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Brainstorm">guidelines</a></b> and <b><a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/advanced_search">check</a></b> if your idea has been posted already! ]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
 

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[11] Ubuntu LiveCD enough for upgrading]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12861/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[This one is for offline computers with Ubuntu installed.<br /><br />The idea is making the LiveCD enough to update the Ubuntu on a computer with Ubuntu installed with an earlier version - like with a LiveCD (running from it) with Ubuntu 8.10, being able to update the Ubuntu 8.04 or earlier installed there, with an effort of without touching on any configuration or personal document we may have (like into 'system' home folders like '~/Desktop/' or '~/Documents/')<br /><br />Some people used to reformat the ext3 partitions to install the newer Ubuntu version from fresh instead of updating it from the repositories or offline DVDs, and this method would be useful, since the update would be running from the CD, not from the partition you're updating...<br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12861/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[7] Clean and total elimination of any program]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12877/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Sometimes a program does not work properly because we have made some changes to it, so the same goes wrong or does not work.<br /><br />Elimination and eliminate configuration files and reinstall it should solve the problem.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12877/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[17] Icons in the Gnome Panel without getting shuffled]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12864/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I used to have Gnome Panel plenty of icons, but when i change the display resolution, everything there persists on getting shuffled.<br /><br />The icons inside the Gnome Panel should follow a location sequence (and if it's edge aligned, or center aligned, or part of an icon group), whatever the screen resolution is...<br /><br />I think Gnome Panel will keep on being great when stopping, after a week, on leaving the clock in the left edge, and the Gnome menu in the right edge...<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12864/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[13] screen resolutions grouped into proportions]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12869/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[it's a bit annoying the available screen resolutions appearing as complete mess: 4x3, 5x4, 8x5, 5x3 and 16x9, all mixed, and providing us sickful experiences about weird aspect ratios...<br /><br />The screen resolutions could be grouped as:<br />. 5x4:<br />   640x512<br />   1280x1024<br />. 4x3:<br />   640x480<br />   1280x960<br />. 8x5:<br />   800x500<br />   1280x800<br />. 5x3:<br />   800x480<br />   1024x600<br />. 16x9:<br />   800x450<br />   1600x900<br /><br />or:<br />. 1280x<br />    800 (8x5)<br />    960 (4x3)<br />    1024 (5x4)<br /><br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12869/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[10] 32 bit support in 64 bit ubuntu]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12874/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Im not sure how hard this would be, but wouldn't it be nice if 64 bit ubuntu would also support 32 bit apps? then if there's only a 32 bit debian pakage available, you could still run it on the 64 bit ubuntu without having to compile the application from source I also noticed that even on the live cds the 64 bit ubuntu ran much faster<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12874/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[35] Selecting Location During Installation Is Not Ideal For Touchpads]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12856/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The new method of selecting a location, whereby the mini map auto-zooms inwards and tries to track the cursor is a nightmare to use with a laptop touchpad.  I spent about 5 mins trying to select the London marker.<br /><br />It was very frustrating.  The old method was much more intuitive - where you click to zoom into the general area and it remains locked while you then select the exact location you want.<br /><br />Can we return to the previous model or at least fix this horrible method.  It is (just about) OK with a mouse but useless for laptops.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12856/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[-6] Delphi Like IDE for Ubuntu / Linux]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12831/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Delphi was a de facto for windows, once in time..<br />I think Linux needs such an easy tool... or easier... <br />Eclipse, netbeans and so on exists for Linux, but i think they are difficult and newbie programmers or mid-programmer cannot develop programs..<br /><br />Have you ever developed a database application with eclipse from scratch ? it is so difficult.. <br /><br />The biggest point behind Windows's success i think, <br />1- easiness... according to dos and mac,<br />2- Easy program developing/writing...<br /><br />So, to have a good/simple ide for Linux/Ubuntu would be very nice... <br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12831/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[13] gnome - desktop files in different workspaces]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12814/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[what about this suggestion?<br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGXYLdZEf2c<br /><br />Explanation: everybody knows we can have multiple workspaces on Linux, but the icons at the desktop are the same on all workspaces.<br /><br />The idea would be providing as choice the possibility on having different desktop directories for each workspace.<br /><br />No surprising would be about so many skilled Linux users seems to enjoy and waiting for long time this important usability idea.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12814/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[5] add UBUDSL to repos]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12846/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[UBUDSL is a great utility to easy configure your ADSL internet conection.<br />http://www.ubudsl.com/en/start.php<br /><br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12846/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[12] /home on a SDHC card]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12829/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Linpus Linux on Aspire One comes with a kernel configured with<br /><br />CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME=y<br /><br />which makes it possible to place /home on the SDHC card. On Ubuntu I must replace the ubuntu kernel with my own kernel to avoid breakage with suspend/hibernate. Could it be possible to include this parameter in the 8.10 kernel?<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12829/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[7] Better control of user privileges]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12845/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[It would be nice to have more control over normal/lower level user.<br /><br />My Idea is to make the administrator able to remotely specify what programs a given user (or group) can use, which web-sites they may (not) access, whether or not they may read/edit certain files/directory's and whether or not they have internet access.<br /><br />I know some of these restrictions could make the desktop less esthetically pleasing (getting an error message every time you try to open a program.) But I think this can be worked on. Like making the user only see the programs he has access to, hiding files the user don't have access to, and not showing the internet browser when the internet access is not present.<br /><br />These restrictions could (should?) be accessible from the add user window.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12845/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[14] folder xx right click and add to xx.zip or xx.tgz]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12853/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[right click a folder xx,<br />on right click menu,<br />add archive xx.zip, xx.tgz, xx.rar ..directly, just as in winrar<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12853/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[23] make codecs for mid files]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12850/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[actually mid files cant be played in totem nor any other music players, i have to use timidity to do that, i know what you must be thinking: "you have timidity, what are you asking for", the problem is that timidity is console, and a graphical interface to do this is neede, so we need codecs for this, maybe gstreamer need to add this codec to its pack.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12850/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[27] Sync my contacts on my cell phone with my computer]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12849/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I don't have a fancy phone, but it does have a usb cord. All I would want is the ability to pull contacts off my phone or put contacts on the phone from my evolution contact list. <br /><br />Just a thought if I had a phone number on my phone and on my computer I could figure out how the data is stored on the phone. Then match up the right phone number with the right name. Once that is done the application could push all my contacts on to the cell phone in the language it recognizes. Maybe.<br /><br />It would be great if you could just plug the phone in and the computer automatically ask you if you would like to sync, push, or pull.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12849/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[53] htm/html files thumbnails in Nautilus]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12816/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I was wondering if there is any solution based upon the firefox engine (but not only, I'm not sure how this can be done), to show thumbnails of HTM, HTML, SHTML files,<br />most probably as the SVG files can be previewed in thumbnails.<br />I think this might be useful not only for web designers, developers, but also for simple users that may keep them electronic books in HTML format, or README, INSTALL files.<br />Let's face it a lot of documentation can be stored in HTML.<br /><br />Thanks guys!<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12816/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[26] Folder Encrypt with right click]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12852/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[On any folder/directory,<br />right click,<br />encrypt directly...<br /><br />and ability to decrypt it with pass...easily..<br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12852/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[76] Stop screensaver during screen is turned off by software]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12818/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Hi all,<br />Power settings can turn off the screen for saving energy and turn it on when mouse is moved or a mouse/keyboard button is pressed.<br />Why don't disable screen saver when power settings turn off the screen? it would make ubuntu more "green" because it won't use the CPu or the GPU for processing drawing for the screensaver.<br /><br />As always comments are accepted<br /><br />If you want take a look to my others idea<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33752"> Bug #33752</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>



]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12818/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[155] Protect Ubuntu-users privacy from curious governments]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12819/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In Sweden, as well as in the US, as far as I understood there are now new legislation coming up that seriously compromises the privacy of the users.<br /><br />In Sweden we have two very worrying laws coming up. <br /><br />1. The "FRA-law" that gives the Swedish security police the right to wiretapp and datamine ALL international data traveling through Sweden.<br />2. The "Logging-law". Telco operators will be obliged to collect all information about their users whereabouts and keep that information for a year.<br /><br />We have to work towards the aim: Security by default - and I'm not talking about the system, but to protect our datastreams from being wiretapped.<br /><br />Me personally think that PKI is the solution to use here whereever possible. IF a session to/from a Ubuntu-system could be read in clear text the user/administrator should be aware of it.<br /><br />Postfix is important here, Dovecot as well - all emails should be send over encrypted channels by default.<br /><br />Mark Shuttleworth with his huge knowledge in Digital Certificates (He sold Thawte remember) would be of great help here.<br /><br />I would like to see Mark Shuttleworth and Ubuntu leverage an infrastructure and create services to provide their community with a good, PKI-based solution.<br /><br />Privacy matters<br /><br />Sincerely<br />Niklas Andersson, Swedish TechWorld Open Source<br /><br />Edit: I've made a proposition of a real-world-implementation of a very viable way to solve the email issue at a user-level.<br /><br />See http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/12858/<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12819/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[62] easier tools for making .deb files]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12843/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Since start using Ubuntu, i started to got curious on how can i make my own .deb files.<br /><br />Well, i can imagine most of you when reading this seems to be about on sticking here some Debian or Ubuntu tutorial links about it, but mostly are too complicated or messy, specially when the process of making .deb files is not much more than packaging some non-executable documents.<br /><br />The easier ways i found on making .deb were:<br /><br />1. using alien over .tar.gz tarballs (but it lacks on very important 'control' information for the databases, like dependencies, description, etc.)<br /><br />2. using a .sh with plenty of 'echo' and 'ar' commands, but it can create corrupt .deb files, and so incompatible with gdebi, dpkg and so on...<br /><br />My idea would be being able to create a .deb file from a tool like FileRoller, but of course all suggestions and reccomendations of new tools i may not know are hugelly welcome! =)<br /><br />(in meanwhile, i'm getting stuck into creating tarballs, and expanding them with 'tar -zxvf tarball.tar.gz -C /')<br /><br /><br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12843/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[14] Tools for recovering deleted files (after emptying trashcan)]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12840/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Would be interesting existing tools for recovering deleted files (recovering after emptying them from trashcan), for all filesystem formats available, like ext2/3, hfsplus, fat16/32, ntfs, nfs, xfs, zfs, reiserfs, etc.   - these kind of tools are easily available on other operative systems...<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07-Sep-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12840/</guid>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>

