<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Ubuntu brainstorm]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Post your ideas and vote for the entries you like. Please read the posting <b><a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Brainstorm">guidelines</a></b> and <b><a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/advanced_search">check</a></b> if your idea has been posted already! <br /><b>Maintenance:</b> Ubuntu Brainstorm will be down for maintenance Friday morning GMT for a few hours. Thanks for your understanding.]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
 

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[401] Easily mount not cleanly unmounted NTFS disks]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/4994/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[When an external NTFS hard disk is not cleanly unmounted because you unplugged it wildly on Windows, or because of a Windows crash, there is an error when you try to plug it on ubuntu, explaining what to do on the command line.<br /><br />There should be an easy way to mount the volume anyway, by giving the choice to the user to mount it anyway, or not to mount it. A clear dialog box should do the trick.  <br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175503"> Bug #175503</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>



]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/4994/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[582] Add screensaver settings in gnome-screensaver]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/185/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Since I don't think many people would be scared of an extra button to configure their selected screensaver, it would be really nice if it could be included (like it is in xscreensaver-settings).<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007"> Bug #22007</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>



]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/185/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[71] Store dpkg and apt files in an SQLite database]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/9609/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Store the dpkg available and status files in an SQLite database to improve performance, reduce file size, increase integrity, have better flexibility when searching and simplify updates.<br /><br />The proof of concept has already started.<br /><br />http://people.debian.org/~seanius/dpkg-sqlite/<br /><br />sean finney wrote:<br /><br />I have checked it out, very nice, besides missing a -ldl flag, everything went<br />according to plan. The speed is simply amazing, here is a small benchmark I did<br />on my machine:<br /><br />omega3:/home/joe/build/dpkg-sqlite# echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches<br />omega3:/home/joe/build/dpkg-sqlite# time dpkg -S /usr/bin/gcc<br />gcc: /usr/bin/gcc<br /><br />real    0m4.778s<br />user    0m0.252s<br />sys     0m0.152s<br />omega3:/home/joe/build/dpkg-sqlite# echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches<br />omega3:/home/joe/build/dpkg-sqlite# time ./poc /usr/bin/gcc<br />querying as if listing package /usr/bin/gcc:<br />querying as if for owner of file /usr/bin/gcc:<br />gcc: /usr/bin/gcc<br /><br />real    0m1.306s<br />user    0m0.240s<br />sys     0m0.096s<br />omega3:/home/joe/build/dpkg-sqlite#<br /><br />The difference is drastic. One of the main concerns now is reliability. Does<br />anyone here know of any SQLite horror stories they might like to share ?<br /><br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/9609/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[15] Do filesystem check less often]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/6948/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I know that you can skip this test in hardy but I still think the test is done way to often.<br /><br />EXT3 is a good file system so I see no need to check the file system so often. <br /><br />Users (for example Windows users) may think that Ubuntu has a bad file system you can't trust.<br /><br />An option would be that the first time the file systems need checking tell the user WHY the system is checed and ask how important she think it is (like Never, Seldom, Often) <br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/6948/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[-62] make ubuntu secure!]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12250/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Ubuntu is secure online but its very insecure due to physical access.<br />people can always hack your system by using the Live CD, and they can access files and re-install ubuntu.<br />When Live CD is inserted and a user wants to upgrade/re-install ubuntu should ask for a password (simillar to the sudo box that appears when you want to install software)<br />so what you think? <br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12250/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[9] Make a version of Ubuntu geared towards libraries:]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12591/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I know a lot of libraries in my area hate windows, but it's the only operating system that they can afford (discounts).<br /><br />If a version of Ubuntu was made for libraries, maybe a modified Edubuntu with book cataloging software, I bet a lot of libraries would be willing to make the switch.  If there was a program to catalogue books, it might be more widely adopted in schools and libraries, since they need those capabilities.<br /><br />Bookbuntu maybe?<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12591/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[34] Make the computer give me answers]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5793/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Make a new application or improve Beagle, Tracker or Deskbar.<br /><br />It do acronym lookups, math calculation, fact lookup, data generation, unit conversion, etc.<br /><br />So that when I ask it something, it answers me.<br />RAM? = Random access memory<br />91*74-26 = 6708<br />Capital of Sweden? = Stockholm<br />22 inch in centimeter = 55.88 centimeter<br />chemical formula for water? = H2O<br />#0000ff = shows the color blue<br />01101000 01100101 01101100 01101100 01101111  = hello<br />68 65 6C 6C 6F = hello<br />Hello in Italian? = ciao<br />Time in Tokyo? = 19:46<br />Weather in Paris? = 7°C, sunny.<br />rot13 hello = uryyb<br /><br />So right from the Deskbar (or something) on the desktop, I can ask something, and it will answer me.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5793/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[36] Ubuntu experiment]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11874/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Create a website similar to the Mojave Experiment, except for Ubuntu.  This is a great marketing idea.  It would help show that Ubuntu is an easy to learn alternative to vista and xp.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11874/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[85] Many dmesg and syslog errors should appear as notification balloons as well]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/10477/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[For instance, if you plug in a USB device that is malfunctioning or not detected correctly, errors will be generated in the System Log, but nothing at all will happen in GNOME.  Things like this should generate friendly graphical error balloons so that people at least recognize that something's gone wrong, instead of just thinking the device was not even recognized.<br /><br />As braaivleis points out, it doesn't have to actually pop up the balloon; it can be like the updates icon that appears, but only shows a balloon when you click on it.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/10477/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[-4] Use better compression algorithms to pack software!]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12762/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I have noticed that as compared to other OS (Win + Mac) softwares for Ubuntu always have large size. Eg. Firefox 3 for Win-7.2 Mb; for Ubuntu- 9.5 Mb<br />Opera for Win- 5to6 Mb; for Ubuntu- 7.5 Mb<br />Plz use better compression algorithms so that Linux users don't have to download more than there Windows brethen<br /> <br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12762/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[41] Maintenance Tools]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/4376/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[A GUI tool to verify partitions, schedule verification task, clean temporal files (files-ended-with~) and trash, firewall configuration, search for duplicated files (suggest remove, rename), optimization options (recompile kernel, disable unused services. A suggestion: a learning algorithm can be used), backup tools (profile, home folder, harddisk snapshot) and recovery points. <br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/4376/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[58] Make "photomerge" option in the GIMP]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12313/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I am using the GIMP for a while now and although you have to get used to it, it is fine for pretty much everything. There is one thing in photoshop cs3 however, that I always need to boot to windows for; photomerge.<br />This function merges photo's together so you can get beautiful panorama's from several pictures. I love it! This should be an option in the GIMP as well.<br /><br />I know there is something called "hugin" for the GIMP which claims to do the same. It is however in no way comparable.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12313/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[30] Talk to VMware to include VMware Workstation in the repositories]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/6365/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[VMware Workstation is one of the best cross-platform virtualization software out there (without forgetting VirtualBox!), so why not at least talk to VMware to include it the Partner repositories, or multiverse, or something?<br />VMware is very "Linux friendly", they develop software for Linux, offer freeware versions of products with the basic functions, they support Linux as a "guest" operating system... they even have pre-configured settings for ubuntu!<br /><br />Also, at the moment I think it is the only software for linux capable of virtualizing a copy of Windows (XP) with easy <a href="http://img155.imageshack.us/my.php?image=vmwarepc6.png">3D support</a> (version 6.5, still in beta, but open to the public)<br /><br />I don't see the problem in having it in a different repository (if VMware agrees, of course), disabled by default... it would be good for everyone: the users, the developers, and even for the adoption of Linux itself...<br />Doing that would be giving more freedom of choice to users, freedom to use more programs, freedom to do more things, without taking the freedom of the ones that don't want it or don't need it, not even a bit...<br /><br />I think Linux shouldn't be like:<br /> "Proprietary Software: against it at all costs!"<br /><br />instead sould be more like:<br />"Free Software: the more, the better..."<br /><br />(just my opinion...)<br />Cheers<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/6365/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[-10] Ubuntu and Linux need to emulate retail OS package]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12478/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Linux big problem in getting more user's has been technical in the past. To some extent I suppose it still is. But now the more important problem is getting the average computer user (AKA not a geek) to embrace Linux. I think having a more defined Linux Operating system would go a long way to achieve that. Their is simply too many flavors of Linux out there. Sure we may have one kernel but as with Microsoft having too many Vista versions. The same confusion can happen to Linux.<br />I see questions like which version is right for me?, how do I get it?, how does it install?. In fact the real problem is getting a copy of Linux on a computer. Some just are used to having a disk and throwing it into the CD/DVD drive. <br />Sometimes, I do think the thing that holds Linux back is the same thing that pushes it forward and that's open source.<br />We have seen commercially available versions of Linux such as Red Hat and Susie make headway into corporate environments.But they have not pushed too far towards a consumer desktop OS. What needs to happen is things like Dell implementing a line of Linux desktops and laptops. That makes Linux a viable alternative to Windows when average user's see that a company like Dell supports it.<br />I would like to see Ubuntu continue on its road but with more of a emphasis on making a visual and marketable product with Ubuntu. Rather then a Windows replacement.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12478/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[134] Support "BadRam" patch]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5730/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[My computer has a single bad memory address in it. <br />I should be able to use my computer.  <br /><br />Currently I am forced to limit the amount of ram it is able access by a simple cut off.  There is a better way:<br />http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/<br /><br />I am not even requesting this be on by default.  Just the patch/source included in the repos.  <br /><br />Currently we let people test that they have badram, let's give them the best solution we have.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185804"> Bug #185804</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>



]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5730/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[-43] To Include the plugin "IE Tab" in Firefox 3]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12393/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Hi! I ask to include the plugin "IE Tab" in Firefox 3 in Ubuntu 8.10.<br /><br />https://addons.mozilla.org/es-ES/firefox/addon/1419<br /><br />Reason? IE is a bad web explorer, but our politicians do not know it. Why? because in my case, in Spain, the Public Administration ONLY work in Internet Explorer, when I want to watch my personal information in the University, I need IE, when I have to send information (form) by the website of the ministry of X (jod, culture, education, industry...), I need IE!!! oh my good!! WHY??? WTF!!! Firefox doesn't work well, o directly, doesn't work.<br /><br />If we want that everybody (at less in Spain) install Ubuntu in their PC, and they can work well, we need this (a lot of people don't know that this plugin exist!!).<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12393/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[89] Encourage Users to work with Free Sotfware Formats]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11875/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I've been thinking... there is a lot of trouble with mp3, avi, wma, and all those multimedia formats. (I know legal issues) So, why not making EASIER and a smoother transition to free formats like Ogg. Ogg is actually BETTER than mp3. <br /><br />Its about giving information, making easier things.<br />Example:<br /><br />- When user tries to reproduce mp3 file: <br />offer 2 options, 1) convert to Ogg format and talk about advantages of this format, 2) download proprietary codecs<br /><br />- Every media player should ask this to the user on first run and convert it too if needed. <br /><br />This could be a solution with all the trouble with proprietary media files.<br /><br />FEEL FREE TO SUGGEST ANY OTHER WAY TO GET TO THE SAME OBJECTIVE, USE FREE FORMATS.<br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11875/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[36] Keed whole /etc/ in some kind of versioning system.]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12357/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[[Sorry for misspell in the title - it should be keep not keed]<br /><br /><br />For quite long time I was fighting with ssh server. Finally I figured out the eth0 hadn't been set via /etc/network/interfaces (I wonder how my network was set if not in that file - for more see bug 241796 ;/). I'm not sure if was wrong from a very beginning or something happened after installation. <br /><br />Keeping the /etc/ files in some 'CVS' probably would not help me resolve the issue but for sure help me trace what cause such strange network setting. As a person working in Support I would be really glad to have tool saying that some screw up file that time. <br /><br />Many of support situation can be describe by following conversation:<br /><br />Support - Have you changed anything in your system?<br />Customer - No<br />Support - Are you sure?<br />Customer - Yes of course.<br />Support - by file X looks strange<br />Customer - Oh yes, I changed my network card. Is it important?<br /><br />Seeing log with etc changes will be great in such situation.<br /><br />Interesting links:<br />inotify - 'cron' like tool working based on changes in filesystem<br />http://inotify.aiken.cz/?section=incron&page=about&lang=en<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12357/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[23] HDD formated by GParted default to root ownership disabling writing permissions]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12308/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[After adding a new hard drive to the Ubuntu machine and formatting it to ext3 using GParted, I was surprised that I could not write anything to it.<br /><br />The permission tab in Nautilus was of no help and I was disappointed to find out that the only way to resolve this is by recursively changing the drive mode to 777 (enable user writing). Why isn't there any GUI that explains this or at least, prompt the user to format under their ownership? [Otherwise people will just use FAT32 and ignore permissions altogether?].<br /><br />This idea may be related to the Disk Manager suggestion.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12308/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[-20] Disable enter Password for Administration]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12287/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[It would be nice to have an option put somewhere in administration to disable the requirement of entering your password to do administrative work. It reminds me a lot of vista's notifications, constantly asking for confirmation, although it does not hassle as much. I'm not asking to do away with it, just have the option to have this feature on or off.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/12287/</guid>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>

