<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Ubuntu brainstorm]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Post your ideas and vote for the entries you like. Please read the posting <b><a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Brainstorm">guidelines</a></b> and <b><a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/advanced_search">check</a></b> if your idea has been posted already! ]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07-Oct-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07-Oct-2008 00:00:00 UTC</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
 

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[371] Kernel 2.6.25 for Hardy]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5583/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[1. There are deeply invasive performance/scalability/latency fixes for CFS regressions (vs. 2.6.24) in the 2.6.25 tree.  These fixes are too invasive to be ported to the 2.6.24 kernel without significant risk.<br /><br />2. Many of the driver updates/new drivers in the kernel-ubuntu package are merged into upstream as of 2.6.25. (This is always true, but the smaller the delta against upstream the better on release day).<br /><br />3. Fedora 9 is based on 2.6.25 which means that key RH kernel developers are aggressively working to get the feature and performance/scalability regressions vs. 2.6.18 & 22 fixed.<br /><br />4. The kgdb patch will probably be merged at the start of the 2.6.26 cycle which means the delta vs. 2.6.25 kernel should be pretty manageable.  This would be really valuable from an LTS ongoing perspective.<br /><br />5. The RT patch will be better maintained (and smaller) against 2.6.25. (see #3)<br /><br />6. Better virtualization and SELinux support (see #3).<br /><br />Given the life-cycle of an LTS release (especially this one which will finally have a meaningful chance to enter the data center) these considerations are especially important.  <br /><br />Obviously 2.6.25 would have to be in addition to 2.6.24 for the Hardy 8.04 LTS release time-frame, but it does allow the aforementioned benefits to be propagated forward.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07-Oct-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5583/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[341] Graphical Recovery Mode]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5799/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[When a user currently boots into the 'recovery mode' from GRUB, they are presented with a command-line interface with complete root privileges and no introduction. This is just not user-friendly by any definition.<br /><br />With the introduction of bullet-proof X in 8.04, it should be possible to launch some sort of gui no matter what, so how about creating a guided recovery app (in the style of 'ubiquity-only') that goes something like this:<br /><br />Welcome to the Ubuntu Recovery Helper.<br />-If you booted into this mode because booting Ubuntu normally doesn't work, press continue.<br />-If you have booted into this mode by accident, you can reboot your computer and choose the option to load Ubuntu normally.<br />-If you are an advanced user and would like to go straight to the command-line, press Advanced.<br />[REBOOT] [ADVANCED] [CONTINUE]<br /><br />If they press continue:<br />-If you know approximately what is wrong with your PC, select it below and press Continue.<br />-If you don't know what is wrong, press I Don't Know.<br />[]Graphics Card or Monitor<br />[]Hard Disk<br />[]Sound<br />[]etc.<br />[BACK] [I DON'T KNOW] [CONTINUE]<br /><br />Selecting Graphics Card or Monitor would launch the X.org configuration utility, with the additional option to 'Autodetect any display hardware changes' (runs "sudo dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xorg-server" or whatever the exact code is). Selecting I Don't Know would launch the same prompt that the hardware database thingie uses, and when an error is reported would go to the appropriate item from the list above.<br /><br />I'm not going to go through the entire thing, but I'm sure you get the idea. At the moment, Windows recovery mode is just an admin desktop, and Ubuntu is command-line. We're currently behind, but implementing something like this would put us years ahead. It would also make a great 'important feature' for 8.10 (like compiz-fusion was for 7.10).<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/friendly-recovery"> Blueprint friendly-recovery:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07-Oct-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5799/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[35] make python and ruby scripts icons like in KDE]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/4344/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[ubuntu needs icons for python and ruby scripts like there is in KDE.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07-Oct-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/4344/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[532] Don't limit deviantart competition to wallpapers only!]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/4104/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[There has been some confusion, but to clarify this brainstorm:<br /><br />There is an official deviantart "theme" competition which requests new wallpapers and allows new themes to be inside the submission.  However, there are two issues: <br />1) the contest requires the construction of a wallpaper<br />2) themes and mockups are ungraded and unacknowledged.<br /><br />This brainstorm argues two amendments:<br />1)Mockups-only submissions with previous ubuntu wallpapers should be allowed.  Wallpapers should not be required.  Mockups shouldn't have to be GTK themes.<br />2)Even if only wallpapers get prizes, there should be a best-mockup recognition award to the best non-wallpaper aspect of submissions. (arguably, themes are harder to judge than wallpapers.)<br /><br />This would allowed skilled UI designers who are unskilled artists to compete to win consideration by the ubuntu team.  I'd like to see mockups of theme ideas that are abstract and un-artistic, like https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/round_edge , be able to be in the running for this competition.  We want to improve the ubuntu look and feel, not just reskin it.<br /><br />Sorry for the confusion.  Here's the original brainstorm text:<br /><br />Recently, a brainstorm idea  was created for a DeviantArt theme mock-up competition for Ubuntu 8.10. It was accepted, but canonical changed the competition's scope from themes to just wallpapers only.<br /><br />There's a great deal of interest by the general ubuntu art community to create a new theme for ubuntu, as seen by the Hardy incoming "alternate looks" page, yet this competition was changed from its original scope to a far less interesting scope.<br /><br /><br />Citations:<br />Original idea: (Has been edited) http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/384/<br />Launchpad talking about how the scope is changed: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/deviantart-theme-competition<br />Interest in new themes existed for hardy: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07-Oct-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/4104/</guid>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>

