<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Ubuntu brainstorm]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Post your ideas and vote for the entries you like. Please read the posting <b><a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Brainstorm">guidelines</a></b> and <b><a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/advanced_search">check</a></b> if your idea has been posted already! <br /><b>Maintenance:</b> Ubuntu Brainstorm will be down for maintenance Friday morning GMT for a few hours. Thanks for your understanding.]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
 

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[106] Ctrl + Z should work in F-Spot too.]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/17012/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[When editing in f-spot ctrl + z (there is no Edit>Undo either) should undo changes on current version. Having to go back to original after after a bad change after having done a few things can be quite frustrating, especially since Ctrl Z is pretty standard throughout the system.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/17012/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[174] "Speed up" Ubuntu by reducing duration of Compiz animations]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/17009/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[After i saw my brother's mac applications start up in split seconds, i thought why can't my ubuntu do that?<br /><br />That's when i noticed that the compiz animation for opening windows actually increases the time for a program to start.<br /><br />I tried reducing the duration of that certain animation from 200 to only 50 and now it feels like my system is much faster and responsive just because i saved that half a second here and there.<br /><br />My point is the default animation durations for compiz should be shorter to give the impression of a more responsive operating system. But that doesn't mean it should be disabled, because compiz animations never fail to impress people.<br /><br />The animations for closing windows can be left longer to act as eyecandy because it affects the overall responsiveness less.<br /><br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/17009/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[484] Use packagekit to improve standardization]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/64/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Hi guys!<br />packagekit gets more and more attraction, i don't think that i have to explain it here, someone who knows this page knows also packagekit and its possibilities i.e. share package discribtions & news, openoffice.org can use it for the installation from additional packages/art; automatic printer driver download from lsb-site and so on...<br /><br />more here:<br />http://packagekit.org/<br />and a really hot presentation from fosdem08:<br />http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/public/introduction-to-packagekit.pdf<br /><br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/packagekit-intrepid"> Blueprint packagekit-intrepid:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/64/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[17] C++ 0x support for GCC]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16936/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x">C++ 0x</a> is the next generation C/C++ language (please note, C# is actually technically not considered to be part of the series).<br /><br />Whilst the language hasn't been finalised yet, it is now considered to be a late draft, and should be finalised next year. I propose that we already start adding support for C++ 0x to GCC, so that developers can begin learning it, and experimenting with it. This way full support would be available shortly after the language is finalised, and with a working C++ 0x compiler, bugs in the language will become apparent sooner before the language is finalised.<br /><br />If we wait (AGAIN), everyone except linux (again) will have full support. C++ 0x adds significant programming improvements including multi-threading natively (so that multi-threading is no longer OS specific, and dependant on foreign libraries), Regular expressions (these can offer MAJOR programming benefit, we need seperate libs to do that currently) and smart pointers (which will make a massive difference in security and reliability of code). In other words, it corrects MAJOR shortcomings in c++/C.<br /><br />As C++ 0x is an improvement on top of C++, the foundations are laid, some extra functionality simply needs to be laid on top.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16936/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[86] File-roller - Progress bar should indicate progress in multi-file-archives]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16928/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Lots of multi-file-archies (like RAR) contains only a couple of files, say an ISO-file and a readme.<br /><br />When unpacking these the progress bar will first go to 50% (unpacked the readme-file) and then stay at 50% until the other (big) file is unpacked.<br /><br />I think file-roller progress bar should move as the unpacking traverses all the different files. This way you get a much better indication of progress.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16928/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[120] Make use of multiple CPUs and cores]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16932/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[CPUs these days often have more than one core. Still, we are typically utilizing only one because the application using a lot of processing power is singlethreaded. I suggest Ubuntu encourages multithreading in applications (where the task at hand is parallelizable, of course).<br /><br />These are a few examples of where I think it would be particularly useful:<br />- firefox, especially with flash on several pages at once<br />- video decoding<br />- image processing (including eog as well as gimp)<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16932/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[45] Something like Frontrow!]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/257/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[A nice, (pretty) application for viewing media quickly and efficiently would be awesome.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/257/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Adding Giver into Ubuntu 9.04]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16843/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[There is little program that can be used to quickly share files within a local network called Giver that would be ideal for Ubuntu, as it is easy to use.<br /><br />http://code.google.com/p/giver/<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16843/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[49] File sharing via avahi]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/3841/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Maybe the Pidgin guys are working on this already, but Pidgin doesn't let you share files via the Bonjour connection.<br /><br />It would be nice to have a little app like Giver (although I despise the bloat and overhead of mono) for transferring files between machines on a local network.<br /><br />This is something I haven't found on Windows yet that would make Ubuntu a million times easier in small offices.  No headaches about thumb-drives, setting up shared folders, figuring out how to connect to shared folders, burning to CDs, etc...just drag and drop from one user to another.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/3841/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[13] Notifications, indicators and alerts]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16829/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[so I have read the mark shuttleworth post on his blog<br />(this is the link: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/253 )<br /><br />I think, why make this change?? It's nice for me, but a lot of people don't like this, so make a program like growl for osx, this is the link to the project:<br />http://growl.info/<br /><br />...and some screenshot:<br />http://growl.info/screenshots.php<br /><br />...OR... ask to user what kind of notification use.. it's the best way, for me :)<br /><br /><br />HAPPY XMAS AT ALL :)<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16829/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[78] project management as a new component for OpenOffice.org ]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16835/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[There is no free and PROFESSIONAL project management software on Linux (and on Windows too).<br /><br />I tried Ganttproject, Planner and OpenWork bench. They are not as easy to use (a waste of time) as MS project.<br /><br />I think the OpenOffice.org project is the best challenger. Imagine interactions with other components and the next PIM component.<br />http://marketing.openoffice.org/ooocon2007/programme/wednesday_186.pdf<br /><br /><br />Management project is a real part of office software (MS project is a part of MS Office...)<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16835/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[270] Offer to uninstall unused dependencies when uninstalling a package]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16831/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[If I install package A system will propose installing packages B,C,D that A depends upon. But if I uninstall A B,C,D will be left even if nothing else uses them. Of course this can be checked and done manually, but wouldn't it be better if Synaptic checked if anything else depends upon those packages and ask the user if he/she wants to uinstall them too?<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122064"> Bug #122064</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>



]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16831/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[213] Include a thumbnail of apps in Add/Remove ]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5961/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Include a thumbnail of how the application looks in the Add/Remove Program in the description pane. <br /><br />This visual reminder will help users to recognise the program desired quickly.<br /><br />I have found that the icons for the programs, that are available in Add/Remove, are sometimes not enough to identify the application<br /><br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5961/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[500] Usplash should use a time-based progressbar.]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/15741/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Currently, the progressbar in usplash is updated by the initialization scripts.<br /><br />Although this works ok, the progress effect is very ugly because the bar moves in huge increments and then stops for an undetermined time until it moves again. Besides not being beautiful, this provides no information to the user about the time remaining for the boot or shutdown process.<br /><br />I suggest that the usplash progressbar be time-based, pretty much like the progressbar in MacOSX.<br /><br />Since the booting and shutdown times do not change drastically from session to session, we could save the time the computer spent to boot and to shutdown, and use it to guide the progressbar the next time. This would provide a beautiful and smooth animation of the progressbar, and an accurate remaining time, increasing the usability.<br /><br />This can be already implemented using the current usplash code without modifications whatsoever, and a working solution is already available.<br /><br />Please check it here:<br />http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php?content=93386<br /><br />Ubuntu PPA:<br />https://launchpad.net/~usplash-smooth/+archive<br /><br />Ubuntu WIKI:<br />https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UsplashSmooth<br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299586"> Bug #299586</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/usplash-smooth"> Blueprint usplash-smooth:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>

<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=985390"> Ubuntuforums.org thread #985390</a>
<br/>

]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/15741/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[163] Increase the use of drag and drop in ubuntu utilities]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/15860/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I was modifing my startup application yesterday and i though wouldn't it be great if i could just drag a shortcut into the startup programs from my desktop.<br /><br />Same with editing the menus. While the menu editor is open the menu could be edited also by dragging icons around the menu and from the desktop.<br /><br />another instance would be to allow someone to drag different elements onto the theme manager. Dragging a tar.gz would install the theme. Dragging a wall paper sized photo would set it as the wallpaper for that theme.  Same with fonts, icons and other bits.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/15860/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[300] Usplash when going down for Hibernate or Standby]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/15861/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Would look more serious and professional!<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36668"> Bug #36668</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>



]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/15861/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[381] Ubuntu icon on the system partition]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/15867/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[For usability reasons I propose that we attach a Ubuntu logo icon to the disk icon for the system partition.<br /><br />Check my <a href="http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/1363/ubuntulogokj8.png">mockup</a> of before and after.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301035"> Bug #301035</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>



]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/15867/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[117] Badge private folders with user avatar]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/15826/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[If a folder or file is owned by a specific user, and private, badge it with that users avatar, if any<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/15826/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[57] Create a database for file extensions]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/15063/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Create an online database with information about file extensions, which the user could be asked to be redirected to in case there is no program available to open a specific file<br /><br />Microsoft has this, only in Ubuntu 's case, it would be based upon user submissions and thus much better updated<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/15063/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[90] opening in new tab using ctrl [nautilus]]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/15066/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Like in firefox, clicking while holding down ctrl should open a new tab in Nautilus. <br /><br />More specific:<br />ctrl + back, ctrl + next, ctrl + up should open a new tab.<br />ctrl + double clicking on a map should open a new tab<br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/15066/</guid>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>

