Ubuntu QA:
BlogBrainstormPackage status
Log in
Ubuntu QA
The Ubuntu community has contributed 13882 ideas, 66434 comments, 1286163 votes

Contributor mcglnx




up
4891
down
Clean up Preferences and Administration.  
Launchers under "System > Preferences"
and "System > Administration" have
similar names, leads to confusion. (#174277)


In : ubuntu
Status : Confirmed
Importance : Wishlist
Assignee : Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
20 comments, 8 subscribers and 0 duplicates
bug
Ubuntu

In :  
Priority : Undefined
Definition : New (Needs guidance)
Implementation : Unknown
Assignee :
spec
forum
Written by writser the 28 Feb 08 at 16:49. Category: System. Related to: Nothing/Others. New
First of all: What is the difference between Preferences and Administration? For example: why do I see 'Encryption and Keyrings' in Preferences and 'Keyring Manager' in Administration? What is the difference between 'Default Printer' and 'Printing'? Why do I have to disable the Tracker under Sessions and not under Search and Indexing? And why are these menu's so large? I have 24 items in Preferences (they don't even fit on my screen!) and 18 items in Administration. To put all this stuff in a popup menu is bad interface design imho. Besides, the number of option should be much smaller. A few suggestions:

- Merge 'Screensaver', 'Screen Resolution' and 'Screens and Graphics'.
- Merge 'Network', 'Network Proxy' and 'Network Tools'.
- Merge 'Update Manager, Synaptic Package Manager, Software Sources'.
- Merge 'Encryption and Keyrings', 'Authorizations', 'Keyring Manager'.


Below are all settings I can visit via the System menu. This is just way too much.


-- Preferences --
Universal Access
About Me
Appearance
Bluetooth
Default Printer
Encryption and Keyrings
Keyboard
Keyboard Shortcuts
Main Menu
Mouse
Network Proxy
PalmOS Devices (I don't have one)
Power Management

[....]

See the 99 comments (latest comment the 9 Oct 08 at 15:09) >>

up
710
down
Easy file sharing between local users  
Ubuntu

In :  
Priority : Undefined
Definition : Discussion (Needs guidance)
Implementation : Not started
Assignee :
spec
Written by kamil.paral the 8 Mar 08 at 21:20. Category: Accessibility. Related to: Nothing/Others. New
Currently there is no way to easily share files between multiple local users. I am talking about full read-write access to particular folder, eg. music folder.

Example: Alice and Bob uses the same computer. Alice has read access to Bob's home folder. Bob has read access to Alice's home folder. They want to fully share (read/write) their music. So they should ideally create /home/music folder, put all the music there and use it. Everything Bob puts into there, Alice should be able to read and remove, and vice versa. This is currently impossible in Ubuntu. Bob has to manually fix permissions every time Alice wants to delete something Bob's (Bob creates /home/music/Britney, but Alice can't delete /home/music/Britney/song1.mp3).

I have discussed this issue with several linux gurus and there is currently no easy nor difficult way to achieve this in Linux on the same (ext3) partition. With every proposed solution I can give you counterexample (group permissions, ACLs, local Samba, local NFS, etc - there is always problem when moving files). There would have to be created utility to set shared folders and some daemon would have to monitor changes and modify permissions.

Currently the easiest solution known for me is to share files on separate (ironically) NTFS partition, because when mounting NTFS you can force user/group/permissions on file access. What a shame, we use Microsoft technologies just to share files between Ubuntu users.

This problem is quite serious, give it a thought or two. Everyone who is not using Ubuntu computer alone and wants to share music/films/etc between multiple users knows what I am talking about.

//New info:
Atany has proposed in the comment that BindFS project can be used to achieve this functinality:
http://code.google.com/p/bindfs/
I have tried it and it works very well. Developers which would like to implement this idea should have a look on BindFS, it's very promising tool, it could provide all necessary background for this.

Developer comments
The proposed inotify/chmod hack in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LocalFileShare would probably work to some degree, but I think it is subject to race conditions, and also not very flexible.

A slightly better solution would IMHO be to provide the shared directory through FUSE; then we can impose dynamic size limitations (at most use 2/3 of the available space in /home, etc.), fine-grained dynamic permissions, and avoid a lot of inotifying and permission race conditions.

Once this is solved and provided by default, we should reconsider "#6106: Make so other people cant access your home directory", which we didn't do yet in order for people to be able to share files r/o.

See the 43 comments (latest comment the 2 Oct 08 at 21:25) >>

up
152
down
Talk with FSF.org to legitimate translated GPL/LGPL  
Written by Andrei Zhekov the 9 Mar 08 at 11:17. Category: Others. Related to: Nothing/Others. New
There is a problem with GPL/LGPL in my country (Russia) and may be in others. Our law dictate to approve only licenses written in the native language but FSF admits only the English variant. So, this problem is slowing down in some manner the convertation of the market to open source in my country. Please fix it!

See the 14 comments >>